>a 300 inline six is almost
>like a 400.....
>300 divided by 6 = 50.....
>
>50 x 8 = 400.
>also.... 4.9 divded by 6 then
>x 8 comes very close
>to 6.6, the displacement of
>a 400.
>ofcourse the only differnce is there
>is only 6 cylinders and
>there inline instead of a
>v form.
>
>i dont know if the valvetrains
>are simular.






The 300 has a bore of 4", the 400 had a bore of 4". The 300 has a stroke of 3.98. The 400 had a stroke of 4"

The 4.9 has a acurate cid of 300.09. The 6.6 had a acurate cid of 402.12

The 300 was built from the 240.

Pastmaster's 1993 XLT 5.0 E40d 3.55LS Normal Cab/Long bed Loaded from the factory with aid of...MSd 6a ign/s.p. wires, blaster coil, Hypertech Chip, K&N filtercharger, Cat-back dual exhuast w/o mufflers, 3.5", echo tips, Accel distributor cap, Dark Mocha over light mocha. 5% Dark tint, Alpine Cd player/remote, Pioneer speakers.

 

i know the 300 six is made from a 240, i got my pushrod cover off of a 240, i didnt say it was made from a 400. just the cylinder size seems very simular to a 400.

 

I'm not flaming ya, motorcraftsman!! I am just replying.

The 240, 300, 289?, 255?, 302, 351, and 400 all had 4" bores.

Pastmaster's 1993 XLT 5.0 E40d 3.55LS Normal Cab/Long bed Loaded from the factory with aid of...MSd 6a ign/s.p. wires, blaster coil, Hypertech Chip, K&N filtercharger, Cat-back dual exhuast w/o mufflers, 3.5", echo tips, Accel distributor cap, Dark Mocha over light mocha. 5% Dark tint, Alpine Cd player/remote, Pioneer speakers.

 

sorry,its only i just noticed if a 300 six had 2 more cylinders its cid would be 400 or so.