1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Are your U-joints over torqued ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 03-08-2005, 01:32 PM
strokster's Avatar
strokster
strokster is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by xfordman
Thanks for the great input guys. Earl, I really liked that chart. Sitting here thinkin, the problem is that a socket won't fit on the nut so we can use torque wrench. What about one of those crowfoot thingies? If that would fit would that change the torque reading?
I think there is a torque factor that needs to be applied anytime you offset the torque wrench. But because this is such a low torque anyway I would not worry about it. Your main concern is overtorquing so go to the low or middle setting.
 
  #17  
Old 03-08-2005, 01:51 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl
Earl is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Waynesville, OH
Posts: 3,730
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by strokster
I think there is a torque factor that needs to be applied anytime you offset the torque wrench. But because this is such a low torque anyway I would not worry about it. Your main concern is overtorquing so go to the low or middle setting.
If you keep the crowfoot wrench at right-angles to the torque wrench handle, you don't need to use a correction factor - the torque at the crowfoot end is the same as at the end of the torque wrench. If you can't get at the nut with the crowfoot wrench at 90 degrees, most 3/8" drive torque wrenches are about 12" long so the maximum correction for a typical 3/4" long crowfoot would be about 6%. The torque wrenches are typicall only good to about +/- 5% of the setting and you have a range from 15-17 ft-lbs (or about 6%). As strokster said, the correction is small enough that you could shoot for 15 ft-lbs on the torque wrench and probably be close enough even with a crowfoot attachment.
 
  #18  
Old 03-08-2005, 07:40 PM
51ford fan's Avatar
51ford fan
51ford fan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle WA.
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Earl
The 1956 shop manual has the following chart for torque specs. All values are in ft-lbs. For the rear axle yoke on smaller trucks, it's a 5/16-24 UNF thread and the torque spec is 15-17 ft-lbs.

Earl you never cease to amaze me with the amount of information you supply. You and Barry both deserve a big pat on the back.

Thanks Rod
 
  #19  
Old 03-08-2005, 08:14 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl
Earl is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Waynesville, OH
Posts: 3,730
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Rod,

I'd like to claim some magic formula, but the stuff is right out of the shop manual. I guess the scanner must be the magic ingredient, eh? Either that or Barry and I are the only ones that read the manuals. I think that means we can't be guys anymore - my wife will be very disappointed!
 
  #20  
Old 03-08-2005, 08:33 PM
51ford fan's Avatar
51ford fan
51ford fan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seattle WA.
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Earl
Rod,

I'd like to claim some magic formula, but the stuff is right out of the shop manual. I guess the scanner must be the magic ingredient, eh? Either that or Barry and I are the only ones that read the manuals. I think that means we can't be guys anymore - my wife will be very disappointed!
A few weeks ago you put a bunch of Mc Master Carr part numbers in a post for a guy. I know you had to have spent a lot of time typing all that in. You always seem to take the extra time to add all the extra information.

Rod
 
  #21  
Old 03-08-2005, 08:36 PM
Earl's Avatar
Earl
Earl is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Waynesville, OH
Posts: 3,730
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
OK Rod, guilty as charged.

By the way, on the original subject of this thread, my wife just looked over my shoulder and comented "your u-joints have been over-torqued since you were a teenager." I guess having your u-joints over-torqued is a personal fault or something?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
c91x
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
07-14-2015 03:43 PM
Dalek Sec
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
1
11-17-2013 03:59 AM
68murc
Ontario Chapter
2
10-12-2013 09:07 AM
52 panel
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
02-15-2011 01:54 PM
mako171
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
5
10-09-2006 06:34 AM



Quick Reply: Are your U-joints over torqued ???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.