Chevy engines in Fords?
#31
I bet this topic has caused a few people to get excited! I mean you are going to have both good and bad points on both, with clearly the deciding factor being what suits you the best! Personal opinion though, you wanted a ford keep it a ford.......just my .02$
#32
I understand your point about the $$$ Oldjeep, however we are talking about trucks on magazines, shows, etc. These trucks are not low budget and they could easily afford a Ford engine in them, not to mention a very nice one. I don't want to bleed this post too much, but putting a Chevy engine in a Ford truck is like washing your hands with gloves on. It doesn't make sense. If it was about the $$$. I think I would have to save my pennies until I could afford a Ford engine, and then do it right. Wish I had a $ for everyone I heard say, "Why would he put a Chevy engine in a hot Ford truck like that?"
#33
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 2,119
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
For sheer torque from that 1970 era you couldnt beat the 472 & 500 Caddys. And they idled so smooth!
Another was the 70 455 Buick which even outtorqued the Olds at 510 AND the Buick is only a few pounds heavier than a SBC! If you bought the Stage ll package from the dealer it was all over but the shouting. And the good stuff was waiting but the EPA and insurance companies killed it. The stage lll was a 500+ hp 455 hemi !! A few prototypes still exist.
Another was the 70 455 Buick which even outtorqued the Olds at 510 AND the Buick is only a few pounds heavier than a SBC! If you bought the Stage ll package from the dealer it was all over but the shouting. And the good stuff was waiting but the EPA and insurance companies killed it. The stage lll was a 500+ hp 455 hemi !! A few prototypes still exist.
#34
I guess I will have pretty good company while spending eternity in damnation for mixing breeds:
http://www.boydcoddington.com
Check out the Ford cars. Ten bucks to a day old Krispy Kream he'd do the same with my 48 F1.
We'll have plenty of time to thorougly discuss the subject.
http://www.boydcoddington.com
Check out the Ford cars. Ten bucks to a day old Krispy Kream he'd do the same with my 48 F1.
We'll have plenty of time to thorougly discuss the subject.
#35
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,672
Received 1,353 Likes
on
1,112 Posts
Originally Posted by f1fordguy
I guess I will have pretty good company while spending eternity in damnation for mixing breeds:
http://www.boydcoddington.com
Check out the Ford cars. Ten bucks to a day old Krispy Kream he'd do the same with my 48 F1.
We'll have plenty of time to thorougly discuss the subject.
http://www.boydcoddington.com
Check out the Ford cars. Ten bucks to a day old Krispy Kream he'd do the same with my 48 F1.
We'll have plenty of time to thorougly discuss the subject.
#36
Years ago I was working on a 1936 Plymouth Business Coupe. I aquired a 289 for in it, and it wouldn't fit without firewall/radiator modification. The stagered head design and extended water pump made it a lot more involved to install. I sold it and purchased a 327 and was able to put it in with no problem. In my years of rodding the only thing the builders were intrested in was performance. What ever engine/trans combo they could come up with at a reasonable cost. The current crop of Ford engines didn't come out till 1964, and were out of the reach of most guys with families. The GM drivelines were within there reach, the Olds and Buicks were probably most popular. Most of the guys that grew up with this mentality are the ones still building hotrods. As for me, I'm leaning toward the 350 chevy myself, when I get around to replacing the Flathead 6 in my 51. I just know from past experience, for me, the 350 will be less hassle and less cost to install. And I will keep my hood closed at any shows I may attend so I won't offend anyone. Seems like some people in this forum have taken the place of the diehard restorer. They used to cry foul at any attempt to upgrade or change and orginal. I sure would like to know if Boyd Connington gets any hate mail for taking that perfectly good old model T, and cutting it up on last weeks American Hotrod show.
#37
I have to come on line and say that it is truly a personal prefferance as to which power plant to use. I myself come from the school of thought that if it is Ford you stay Ford. I have seen many threads about the differences between the small block verses Big block or the 302 compared to the 351. All you need to do is go to your local engine builder and discuss with him or her what you want to do and how you plan to use the truck. There is so much interchangability with the engines and the horsepower or torque you can create is limited to your creativity. My son and I have constructed some mustangs that could do some amazing things. Case in point is the 78 fastback he had. He had a 302 with large valve and an RV cam and only a duece carb. When he bought it it was orange and most of the kids in town hated it. Told them if they could beat it they could pick the color. It was orange when he sold it. I don't think the color was the problem. Good Luck.
Gear Up
Gear Up
#38
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,672
Received 1,353 Likes
on
1,112 Posts
Originally Posted by 51ford fan
Years ago I was working on a 1936 Plymouth Business Coupe. I aquired a 289 for in it, and it wouldn't fit without firewall/radiator modification. The stagered head design and extended water pump made it a lot more involved to install. I sold it and purchased a 327 and was able to put it in with no problem. In my years of rodding the only thing the builders were intrested in was performance. What ever engine/trans combo they could come up with at a reasonable cost. The current crop of Ford engines didn't come out till 1964, and were out of the reach of most guys with families. The GM drivelines were within there reach, the Olds and Buicks were probably most popular. Most of the guys that grew up with this mentality are the ones still building hotrods. As for me, I'm leaning toward the 350 chevy myself, when I get around to replacing the Flathead 6 in my 51. I just know from past experience, for me, the 350 will be less hassle and less cost to install. And I will keep my hood closed at any shows I may attend so I won't offend anyone. Seems like some people in this forum have taken the place of the diehard restorer. They used to cry foul at any attempt to upgrade or change and orginal. I sure would like to know if Boyd Connington gets any hate mail for taking that perfectly good old model T, and cutting it up on last weeks American Hotrod show.
#39
Interesting thread...some for, some against, some to each their own.
I'm basically a Ford guy. My grandfather worked at the Rouge foundry from the mid 20's until he retired in the mid 60's. My Dad was a Ford engineer at triple E for over 40 yrs. Fords are in my bloodline...no doubt about it. EVERY vehicle I've ever owned or bought new has been a Ford . But when it comes to a pre 50 or 60 hotrod, streetrod or whatever, I'll never hold it against a guy as to what's under the hood. Indeed, I admire the engineering involved in an engine swap.
Now as far as engines go, I have my favorites...and it's not just 'because'. For 15 years (circa 1970-1985) I made my living as a wrench and as such, rebuilt just about every engine around at the time. And you know what? They were all damn good...well, except for the Chevy Vega . And naturally, I had my favorites when it came to performance: the 429 CobraJet, the pre-454 big block Chevys and the Mopar 440 & Hemi...yup, all big blocks; I've never been happy with any small block when it comes to performance. I've driven all 3 of those engines in a friend's or customer's car and would give them all a 10...and I guarantee any one brand person will like them all if he/she ever got the chance to drive one, too.
Would I put any one of those in my Effie? Absolutely!! Do I have one of those in my Effie? Yer damn right...one of these days I'll tell you which one .
Norb
I'm basically a Ford guy. My grandfather worked at the Rouge foundry from the mid 20's until he retired in the mid 60's. My Dad was a Ford engineer at triple E for over 40 yrs. Fords are in my bloodline...no doubt about it. EVERY vehicle I've ever owned or bought new has been a Ford . But when it comes to a pre 50 or 60 hotrod, streetrod or whatever, I'll never hold it against a guy as to what's under the hood. Indeed, I admire the engineering involved in an engine swap.
Now as far as engines go, I have my favorites...and it's not just 'because'. For 15 years (circa 1970-1985) I made my living as a wrench and as such, rebuilt just about every engine around at the time. And you know what? They were all damn good...well, except for the Chevy Vega . And naturally, I had my favorites when it came to performance: the 429 CobraJet, the pre-454 big block Chevys and the Mopar 440 & Hemi...yup, all big blocks; I've never been happy with any small block when it comes to performance. I've driven all 3 of those engines in a friend's or customer's car and would give them all a 10...and I guarantee any one brand person will like them all if he/she ever got the chance to drive one, too.
Would I put any one of those in my Effie? Absolutely!! Do I have one of those in my Effie? Yer damn right...one of these days I'll tell you which one .
Norb
#41
Originally Posted by fomoko1
No hate mail, that is going too far. Any none Ford power plants in a Ford do annoy me but that is someone else`s mistake not mine, easy enough to ignore that vehicle and go on to a good one.
56 Effie Aurora - OK, buddy. I've been wondering long enough what's under that hood of your 56. I think you blew it. If my calculations are correct. Let's see, your whole family has been involved in Fords (just like mine). You were a wrench on Fords (big blocks). Therefore, I would have to guess you have a Cobra Jet 429 under the hood. I might add that engine happens to be one of my favorites next to the 427 SOHC. I do have to agree with you on the big blocks, however I've always enjoyed the 289/302/351W series. I've always been able to tweek them to run hard and they're easy to work on. Just a personal preference.
#42
"Would I put any one of those in my Effie? Absolutely!! Do I have one of those in my Effie? Yer damn right...one of these days I'll tell you which one .
Norb"
................. as he runs back into the closet and slams the door. Come on out Norb. It's time we tended to the business of your new forum nickname.
Norb"
................. as he runs back into the closet and slams the door. Come on out Norb. It's time we tended to the business of your new forum nickname.
Last edited by fatfenders; 11-28-2004 at 09:08 PM.
#43
56 Effie Aurora.... how come there's no engine pics? I could of sworn you mentioned a corvette motor in a post about a gentlemen who was also into corvettes...... I won't hold it against you -4speed
#44
I could understand if it was a restoration, but how boring - using all Ford parts or all chevy, or whatever. I can go to Back to the 50's and see 15-20 F-100's all with a swapped in 9" rear, some god awfull car suspension in the front, and a 460 or a 351 backed with a C4 in them - any color you like. The point of building vehicles to me is to do something different, so that it's not like every other car or truck out there.
Chuck P
www.oldjeep.com
Chuck P
www.oldjeep.com
#45
Ch**y engines are cheap and easy. Ford engines can sometimes be a pain to locate new pulleys and brackets for. Ford engine pulleys and brackets changed numerous times over the years, while chevys parts were much more universal. Stay Ford engine in a Ford!! Fenders has a point about the other non-Ford items in our trucks: chevy or mopar columns, volare front ends, etc. But, the engine is the heart of the truck. Especially the mighty 289!!