View Poll Results: Who do you prefer??
Caterpillar
55
62.50%
Cummins
21
23.86%
Detroit Diesel
12
13.64%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll
Caterpillar vs. Cummins vs. Detroit Diesel
#1
Caterpillar vs. Cummins vs. Detroit Diesel
I know this isn't exactly a Ford vs. a competitor type thread, but I was just curious as to how most truck guys feel about the big diesel makers, Caterpillar vs. Cummins vs Detroit Diesel.
This is not for discussion about the PSD vs. Cummins vs. Duramax.
This is not for discussion about the PSD vs. Cummins vs. Duramax.
#2
#5
#6
Coming from an 18 yr veteran of trucking and an additional 10 years riding with my dad, I have quite a bit of experience with class 8 trucks.
For me there is no choice...a 3406 CAT. My truck is a 1998 Kenworth T-600B, with a 475 hp CAT, 10 speed od and 3.90 gears. 0-60 is measured, but it will run out at 115 mph (if ya got the nerve) at 2200 rpm and will pull a 7% grade at 79,500 lbs at 40 mph. (that 1790 ft lb of torque!!). The engine has 896,000 miles and will be needing a major overhaul pretty soon.
My company has some of the 60 series Detroits, and they are good engines. They don't have the low speed torque of the CAT, but seem to go 1,000,000 miles before rebuild.
The Cummings is almost a disposable engine. The older "Big Cam IV" engine needed rod and main bearings at 250,000 and an "in frame" at 500,000.
All good engines, just a matter of preference.
For me there is no choice...a 3406 CAT. My truck is a 1998 Kenworth T-600B, with a 475 hp CAT, 10 speed od and 3.90 gears. 0-60 is measured, but it will run out at 115 mph (if ya got the nerve) at 2200 rpm and will pull a 7% grade at 79,500 lbs at 40 mph. (that 1790 ft lb of torque!!). The engine has 896,000 miles and will be needing a major overhaul pretty soon.
My company has some of the 60 series Detroits, and they are good engines. They don't have the low speed torque of the CAT, but seem to go 1,000,000 miles before rebuild.
The Cummings is almost a disposable engine. The older "Big Cam IV" engine needed rod and main bearings at 250,000 and an "in frame" at 500,000.
All good engines, just a matter of preference.
Last edited by BadHabitinVA; 08-09-2004 at 09:26 PM. Reason: spelling
#7
Originally Posted by BadHabitinVA
Coming from an 18 yr veteran of trucking and an additional 10 years riding with my dad, I have quite a bit of experience with class 8 trucks.
For me there is no choice...a 3406 CAT. My truck is a 1998 Kenworth T-600B, with a 475 hp CAT, 10 speed od and 3.90 gears. 0-60 is measured, but it will run out at 115 mph (if ya got the nerve) at 2200 rpm and will pull a 7% grade at 79,500 lbs at 40 mph. (that 1790 ft lb of torque!!). The engine has 896,000 miles and will be needing a major overhaul pretty soon.
My company has some of the 60 series Detroits, and they are good engines. They don't have the low speed torque of the CAT, but seem to go 1,000,000 miles before rebuild.
The Cummings is almost a disposable engine. The older "Big Cam IV" engine needed rod and main bearings at 250,000 and an "in frame" at 500,000.
All good engines, just a matter of preference.
For me there is no choice...a 3406 CAT. My truck is a 1998 Kenworth T-600B, with a 475 hp CAT, 10 speed od and 3.90 gears. 0-60 is measured, but it will run out at 115 mph (if ya got the nerve) at 2200 rpm and will pull a 7% grade at 79,500 lbs at 40 mph. (that 1790 ft lb of torque!!). The engine has 896,000 miles and will be needing a major overhaul pretty soon.
My company has some of the 60 series Detroits, and they are good engines. They don't have the low speed torque of the CAT, but seem to go 1,000,000 miles before rebuild.
The Cummings is almost a disposable engine. The older "Big Cam IV" engine needed rod and main bearings at 250,000 and an "in frame" at 500,000.
All good engines, just a matter of preference.
I know a man run one for 1 million before an inframe. No major repairs along the way. An in frame set him back 15 grand though. Aint cheap.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Logical Heritic
I have heard great things about that cat. A guy I know said he would outrun signature 600s with the 475 3406.
I know a man run one for 1 million before an inframe. No major repairs along the way. An in frame set him back 15 grand though. Aint cheap.
I know a man run one for 1 million before an inframe. No major repairs along the way. An in frame set him back 15 grand though. Aint cheap.
#9
edited out off topic comments
anyhoo, i have no experience with any of them, and likely nor do many of our members, but i will be watching to see posts from some of the guys that do..... and ill wonder why john deer was not included in the comparison, but again, not from experience, but because it is a big name, that i hear lots of good things about
anyhoo, i have no experience with any of them, and likely nor do many of our members, but i will be watching to see posts from some of the guys that do..... and ill wonder why john deer was not included in the comparison, but again, not from experience, but because it is a big name, that i hear lots of good things about
Last edited by Carlene; 08-10-2004 at 06:37 AM. Reason: Off Topic - political comment - Carlene
#11
We have Volvo diesels in our trucks... they don't make as much power, but the speed limit is 65, and the contract doesn't pay more if you are early.
The Volvos average 8.43 MPG, up to 9.2, depending on the truck (we have some lighter duty 60,000Lb trucks, and mostly 80,000Lb)
I prefer Caterpillar, they have an awesome reputation, make more power, and theres nothing cooler than saying you have CAT power.
We keep running Volvos because we have had the 60 series Detroits, and Cummins N14 engines, both of which cost us more in maintenance, and ironically they both caused several (very $$$$) transmissions to fail prematurely.
The Volvos average 8.43 MPG, up to 9.2, depending on the truck (we have some lighter duty 60,000Lb trucks, and mostly 80,000Lb)
I prefer Caterpillar, they have an awesome reputation, make more power, and theres nothing cooler than saying you have CAT power.
We keep running Volvos because we have had the 60 series Detroits, and Cummins N14 engines, both of which cost us more in maintenance, and ironically they both caused several (very $$$$) transmissions to fail prematurely.
#12
I've driven all the big truck motors. cat, cumalongs and Detroit's. cats are so smooth and quiet compared to the others. nothing sounds (feels) nicer then a 500 kitty cat working hard pulling a grade like Vail or Eisenhower through a set of 6" straights. if cat came out in a pickup thats the only reason i would ever consider buying a diesel pickup.
#14
No offense meant on the CA comment
I live in VA...I would tow my truck home to have the engine rebuilt if that is what was reasonable. I like having it done with someone I can hold resposible if they don't get it right.
I live in VA...I would tow my truck home to have the engine rebuilt if that is what was reasonable. I like having it done with someone I can hold resposible if they don't get it right.
Last edited by Carlene; 08-10-2004 at 06:39 AM. Reason: Edited out Quote of Off Topic political comment - Carlene
#15
Originally Posted by mattsf250
edited out off topic comments
anyhoo, i have no experience with any of them, and likely nor do many of our members, but i will be watching to see posts from some of the guys that do..... and ill wonder why john deer was not included in the comparison, but again, not from experience, but because it is a big name, that i hear lots of good things about
anyhoo, i have no experience with any of them, and likely nor do many of our members, but i will be watching to see posts from some of the guys that do..... and ill wonder why john deer was not included in the comparison, but again, not from experience, but because it is a big name, that i hear lots of good things about