Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.
View Poll Results: Who do you prefer??
Caterpillar
55
62.50%
Cummins
21
23.86%
Detroit Diesel
12
13.64%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll

Caterpillar vs. Cummins vs. Detroit Diesel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-09-2004, 05:46 PM
MW95F250's Avatar
MW95F250
MW95F250 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Caterpillar vs. Cummins vs. Detroit Diesel

I know this isn't exactly a Ford vs. a competitor type thread, but I was just curious as to how most truck guys feel about the big diesel makers, Caterpillar vs. Cummins vs Detroit Diesel.

This is not for discussion about the PSD vs. Cummins vs. Duramax.
 
  #2  
Old 08-09-2004, 05:49 PM
04F250CC60's Avatar
04F250CC60
04F250CC60 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a mechanics standpoint I'd definately go with CAT Diesel Power! CAT is just a three letter way to spell power & reliability. I have dreams of seeing a bright yellow Twin Turbocharged CAT V8 under the hood of my 550.
 
  #3  
Old 08-09-2004, 05:51 PM
04F250CC60's Avatar
04F250CC60
04F250CC60 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One more thing....Saying "I've got CAT power" sounds so much more manly than cummins or detriot.
 
  #4  
Old 08-09-2004, 05:55 PM
MW95F250's Avatar
MW95F250
MW95F250 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yes, I prefer Cat as well, but in order to keep this thread open, I think some technical info needs to be incorporated. Thanks.
 
  #5  
Old 08-09-2004, 07:28 PM
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cats are great. They are more expensive to buy. Also much more expensive to repair. For cheap reliability. Id take an international. If your talking big otr engines. Then cummins, detroit, and cat all have their shining stars.
 
  #6  
Old 08-09-2004, 09:24 PM
BadHabitinVA's Avatar
BadHabitinVA
BadHabitinVA is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coming from an 18 yr veteran of trucking and an additional 10 years riding with my dad, I have quite a bit of experience with class 8 trucks.


For me there is no choice...a 3406 CAT. My truck is a 1998 Kenworth T-600B, with a 475 hp CAT, 10 speed od and 3.90 gears. 0-60 is measured, but it will run out at 115 mph (if ya got the nerve) at 2200 rpm and will pull a 7% grade at 79,500 lbs at 40 mph. (that 1790 ft lb of torque!!). The engine has 896,000 miles and will be needing a major overhaul pretty soon.

My company has some of the 60 series Detroits, and they are good engines. They don't have the low speed torque of the CAT, but seem to go 1,000,000 miles before rebuild.

The Cummings is almost a disposable engine. The older "Big Cam IV" engine needed rod and main bearings at 250,000 and an "in frame" at 500,000.

All good engines, just a matter of preference.
 

Last edited by BadHabitinVA; 08-09-2004 at 09:26 PM. Reason: spelling
  #7  
Old 08-09-2004, 09:28 PM
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BadHabitinVA
Coming from an 18 yr veteran of trucking and an additional 10 years riding with my dad, I have quite a bit of experience with class 8 trucks.


For me there is no choice...a 3406 CAT. My truck is a 1998 Kenworth T-600B, with a 475 hp CAT, 10 speed od and 3.90 gears. 0-60 is measured, but it will run out at 115 mph (if ya got the nerve) at 2200 rpm and will pull a 7% grade at 79,500 lbs at 40 mph. (that 1790 ft lb of torque!!). The engine has 896,000 miles and will be needing a major overhaul pretty soon.

My company has some of the 60 series Detroits, and they are good engines. They don't have the low speed torque of the CAT, but seem to go 1,000,000 miles before rebuild.

The Cummings is almost a disposable engine. The older "Big Cam IV" engine needed rod and main bearings at 250,000 and an "in frame" at 500,000.

All good engines, just a matter of preference.
I have heard great things about that cat. A guy I know said he would outrun signature 600s with the 475 3406.
I know a man run one for 1 million before an inframe. No major repairs along the way. An in frame set him back 15 grand though. Aint cheap.
 
  #8  
Old 08-09-2004, 09:38 PM
BadHabitinVA's Avatar
BadHabitinVA
BadHabitinVA is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Logical Heritic
I have heard great things about that cat. A guy I know said he would outrun signature 600s with the 475 3406.
I know a man run one for 1 million before an inframe. No major repairs along the way. An in frame set him back 15 grand though. Aint cheap.
I have a quote from my local CAT guy that says $11,500 +/- $200.-$300. I have that in my truck account, and I am determined to run this baby to the end. My luck, I'll be in CA when she goes.
 
  #9  
Old 08-09-2004, 10:08 PM
mattsf250's Avatar
mattsf250
mattsf250 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bass Lake, CA
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
edited out off topic comments


anyhoo, i have no experience with any of them, and likely nor do many of our members, but i will be watching to see posts from some of the guys that do..... and ill wonder why john deer was not included in the comparison, but again, not from experience, but because it is a big name, that i hear lots of good things about
 

Last edited by Carlene; 08-10-2004 at 06:37 AM. Reason: Off Topic - political comment - Carlene
  #10  
Old 08-09-2004, 10:19 PM
Frost13's Avatar
Frost13
Frost13 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nowhere, SE OK
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cat, hands down.

BTW, where's the International option?
 
  #11  
Old 08-09-2004, 10:20 PM
Matts72's Avatar
Matts72
Matts72 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Montana Territory
Posts: 10,323
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
We have Volvo diesels in our trucks... they don't make as much power, but the speed limit is 65, and the contract doesn't pay more if you are early.

The Volvos average 8.43 MPG, up to 9.2, depending on the truck (we have some lighter duty 60,000Lb trucks, and mostly 80,000Lb)

I prefer Caterpillar, they have an awesome reputation, make more power, and theres nothing cooler than saying you have CAT power.

We keep running Volvos because we have had the 60 series Detroits, and Cummins N14 engines, both of which cost us more in maintenance, and ironically they both caused several (very $$$$) transmissions to fail prematurely.
 
  #12  
Old 08-09-2004, 10:27 PM
bassdude's Avatar
bassdude
bassdude is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: colorado
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've driven all the big truck motors. cat, cumalongs and Detroit's. cats are so smooth and quiet compared to the others. nothing sounds (feels) nicer then a 500 kitty cat working hard pulling a grade like Vail or Eisenhower through a set of 6" straights. if cat came out in a pickup thats the only reason i would ever consider buying a diesel pickup.
 
  #13  
Old 08-10-2004, 01:07 AM
optikal illushun's Avatar
optikal illushun
optikal illushun is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Coal Region
Posts: 3,545
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
anyone have some specs of the different lines of cats, cummins, internationals, volvos, etc...?
 
  #14  
Old 08-10-2004, 06:21 AM
BadHabitinVA's Avatar
BadHabitinVA
BadHabitinVA is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No offense meant on the CA comment

I live in VA...I would tow my truck home to have the engine rebuilt if that is what was reasonable. I like having it done with someone I can hold resposible if they don't get it right.
 

Last edited by Carlene; 08-10-2004 at 06:39 AM. Reason: Edited out Quote of Off Topic political comment - Carlene
  #15  
Old 08-10-2004, 07:19 AM
MW95F250's Avatar
MW95F250
MW95F250 is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mattsf250
edited out off topic comments


anyhoo, i have no experience with any of them, and likely nor do many of our members, but i will be watching to see posts from some of the guys that do..... and ill wonder why john deer was not included in the comparison, but again, not from experience, but because it is a big name, that i hear lots of good things about
I would have included John Deere (I own a couple of them myself), but John Deere does not make a engine for OTR trucks, that was my main purpose, to get comparisons of road engines. JD does make a natural gas engine used in public buses though.
 


Quick Reply: Caterpillar vs. Cummins vs. Detroit Diesel



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.