5.4 how far can i go with it ??
#1
5.4 how far can i go with it ??
ok as the title says how far can i go with these things / how far has these things been pushed?
ok i don't go in for that newbie bolt on or nothing crap
ok granted if a set up is made to "bolt on" it ok but common (yuck) bad enough all these thing look the same
ok has any one put the pressure to these?
i personally was thinking of setting up a miller cycle type of motor and stuff it in a p-71 crown vic (sleeper style) quite refined and fast sin a simple black with a 15-30% tint(cordin to what i can get away with)
btw incase ya not fimilar with miller cycle BIG boos(important) and full duration cam open til BDC intake but the big boost keeps the cly gasses from exiting the cylinder.. the motor is not trying to pull against a closed intake valve
as for computer control???
anyone gotz feedback on the theroy???
ok i don't go in for that newbie bolt on or nothing crap
ok granted if a set up is made to "bolt on" it ok but common (yuck) bad enough all these thing look the same
ok has any one put the pressure to these?
i personally was thinking of setting up a miller cycle type of motor and stuff it in a p-71 crown vic (sleeper style) quite refined and fast sin a simple black with a 15-30% tint(cordin to what i can get away with)
btw incase ya not fimilar with miller cycle BIG boos(important) and full duration cam open til BDC intake but the big boost keeps the cly gasses from exiting the cylinder.. the motor is not trying to pull against a closed intake valve
as for computer control???
anyone gotz feedback on the theroy???
#2
#4
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Stock N/A 5.4's can handle around 450hp safely...any more is pushing it. L-truck 5.4's can generally go about 100 hp more. Sure, your hear of people with Lightings pushing 500+ rwhp but that is with good tuning and very risky. 5.4's used in the Cobra R and new GT are a different consideration. Forged internals in these cars are good for 800+ hp. The new GT mill is only related to the truck 5.4 by interal measurements (bore, stroke, bore center distances) everything else is completely custom for that car including the heads (modified Corbra R based 32V's). I don't think Ford is even going to offer these aluminum blocks as FRPP parts anytime soon if at all.
#9
#12
Originally Posted by Camille Marquis
bat_bro miller not in a can way ov thr heds betch it belt out 470 wid 5lbsneed good pump who guna grind thos stiks stok comp wont due
#13
a miller engine uses a super charger to keep presure in the manifold, the theory is that creating vacuum uses horse power, also the cams are ground so that the intake over laps for 15% of the up stroke to feed pressure back into the manifold allowing the use of 2 points higher compresion even though it is a super charged engine, and the exaust timing is so that the valve opens half way down allowing the exaust gases more time to escape since very little power is generated past that point on the down stroke. this mille type engine is able to achive about 20% more power from 20% less fuel . A little expencive since the super charger with stock cams would give you more like 30 to 60% but would of course use more fuel. Do a search on the miller engine very interesting stuff. The mazda millunium has a miller engine but just try to get a salesman to answer that question.
#14
camille you seem to know something ..ok i have a question ..back in 30's or 40's the miller was made and the rights instantly bought up ..skipping ahead to the mid to late 90's mazda starts production
who snatched it up? in other words who should we thank?(please tell me it wasn't ford)
come on the thing has the same output as a ~3 1/2 liter v6 out of a 2 liter so would the curve stay intack..5.4 should put out the power of a 9~9.5 liters engine oh my
ya see what i was talking about?
..sure its not a 2.0 coswoth but given the advantages
so how would it work i wonder custom cams a charger and big intercooler of course a computer
well the way i understand it a miller eliminates the short periods of parisitic drain of the intake(/exaust) valve being closed while the piston is still moving down(against it)
and
when the piston starts the compression stroke the intake is still open initially but the huge charge in the intake makes sure the gases in the clinder have nowhere to go until the valve closes
who snatched it up? in other words who should we thank?(please tell me it wasn't ford)
come on the thing has the same output as a ~3 1/2 liter v6 out of a 2 liter so would the curve stay intack..5.4 should put out the power of a 9~9.5 liters engine oh my
ya see what i was talking about?
..sure its not a 2.0 coswoth but given the advantages
so how would it work i wonder custom cams a charger and big intercooler of course a computer
well the way i understand it a miller eliminates the short periods of parisitic drain of the intake(/exaust) valve being closed while the piston is still moving down(against it)
and
when the piston starts the compression stroke the intake is still open initially but the huge charge in the intake makes sure the gases in the clinder have nowhere to go until the valve closes
#15
The Miller does not give the most horsepower but it does it efficently. Why the automakers don't use this old and proven set up is beyond me. The cost is mostly in development. Once that is done then total added cost would be only the addition of the supercharger, every motor still needs cams and computer. If only I had the resources I belive I have all the theory down. I could also get into thermal dynamics metalurgy, ring seal , controls and fuel systems research has been a hobie for 25 years read engineering hand books and lots of mags,(hot rod.mm\ff car craft4wheelerand so on. look at the ford GT it has alot of the theory right but look at the cost