Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150 SVT Ford F150 Lightning, Roush, Saleen and other performance F150's

2005/2006 lightning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-06-2004, 08:45 PM
1984 f-250's Avatar
1984 f-250
1984 f-250 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005/2006 lightning

does anyone know how the new lightning compares to the dodge srt10? The new lightning is suppose to be around 500 horsepower and torque like the dodge.
 
  #2  
Old 03-06-2004, 11:03 PM
460bigblock4d's Avatar
460bigblock4d
460bigblock4d is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard that they might put the supercooler shot for the intercooler which would boost power by 50... But the motor is suppose to have 500 horsepower and 500 lb-ft torque just like the Ford GT.
 
  #3  
Old 03-13-2004, 01:56 AM
bassaway's Avatar
bassaway
bassaway is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
right, there is soposed to be a supercooled boost shot for the next lightning. sounds neat if you ask me...torque numbers are 550 foot lbs.! supercooled burst is said to add 50 hp to already 500 but i read in some article somewhere that the 50 hp increase is more like 70 hp...yikes! http://www.svt.ford.com/conceptLabLightning.asp go to link and read under engineering.
 

Last edited by bassaway; 03-13-2004 at 02:03 AM.
  #4  
Old 03-13-2004, 04:13 PM
BVFD1983's Avatar
BVFD1983
BVFD1983 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Six speed!!!!!!!
 
  #5  
Old 03-25-2004, 05:18 PM
run351's Avatar
run351
run351 is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: East coast
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sad new is the Gen3s will probably not be produced until 2006.
I have read that they are redoing the Lightning plant.
So like me, you have to wait.
John O
 
  #6  
Old 06-02-2004, 11:06 PM
CJack's Avatar
CJack
CJack is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I heard the Tremec 6 speed will not make it into production.
 
  #7  
Old 06-02-2004, 11:43 PM
tkondro's Avatar
tkondro
tkondro is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Saskatoon
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Lightning and SRT-10 will be very close in a foot race. I know that they raced the new GT (same motor as the lightning, without the intercooler hp boost) against the Viper and the viper won by something like 0.01 seconds in the 1/4 mile.

I think it depends on how heavy they plan on making the new lightning. (hopefully not as heavy as the new F-150's.

I just wish that Ford would make an engine that could compete with the SRT-10 without supercharging it all the time. Don't get me wrong, I do not like dodge at all, but it looks whimpy to slap a supercharge on and think it is the best. I know if dodge supercharged the viper engine it would waste the lightning.
 
  #8  
Old 06-20-2004, 12:38 AM
gosvtgo's Avatar
gosvtgo
gosvtgo is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that SVT's goal is to produce a more fuel friendly (12mpg compared to 9mpg dodge) and lighter front end with more performance than the dodge. The SRT10 has not shown any performance other than straight line speed and tire burn outs. The Lightning has always been a more all around performance truck. Dodge knows how to make performance cars (Viper), but I don't think they can compete in the performance truck market yet when they base it off of top speed numbers.
 
  #9  
Old 06-20-2004, 10:18 AM
strick4.2's Avatar
strick4.2
strick4.2 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they dont need a supercharger they have a gas hoggin v10.....I think factory supercharging is one of the best things ford has developed in a while....just look at the cobra, they own the streets for around 35k......with the supercharger I think u get better gas mileage and smaller cubic inchs, less weight better handeling.....just my .02
 
  #10  
Old 06-20-2004, 02:51 PM
Saurian's Avatar
Saurian
Saurian is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Centerville, Iowa
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Cubic Inches Vs. Forced Induction? I'd personally prefer the cubic inches. Less to go wrong, less to fix, less to worry about.

What about Turbocharing a 5.4? How would that do as far as numbers? Or is the 5.4 not capable of being T-charged? Those 3 valve heads ought to be GREAT for it...
 
  #11  
Old 06-20-2004, 05:43 PM
chaseface84's Avatar
chaseface84
chaseface84 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 2005 GT's numbers were increased from 500 hp to 550. i dont know if thats what its been all along and they were waiting till it got closer to leave dodge scramblering to try to keep up or what but ill bet the do the same thing with the lightning. Its nice that FORD finally has some compitition in the sport truck market
 
  #12  
Old 06-22-2004, 02:50 PM
GarySS's Avatar
GarySS
GarySS is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats the correct answer, all comes down to Corperate average fuel economy

Originally Posted by gosvtgo
I think that SVT's goal is to produce a more fuel friendly (12mpg compared to 9mpg dodge) and lighter front end with more performance than the dodge. The SRT10 has not shown any performance other than straight line speed and tire burn outs. The Lightning has always been a more all around performance truck. Dodge knows how to make performance cars (Viper), but I don't think they can compete in the performance truck market yet when they base it off of top speed numbers.
 
  #13  
Old 06-22-2004, 09:22 PM
Saurian's Avatar
Saurian
Saurian is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Centerville, Iowa
Posts: 2,155
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Hopefully the Lightning will still be a "mash and hook" truck like it is now. Sure the SRT Ram has more power and everything, but it has a HELL of a time putting that down at the strip. The Lightning on the other hand is a lead-foot, tire-hooking machine. With that power increase...I really hope it doesn't suffer from the traction problems the Ram has. Throw some fat meat on her...=)

I think they need to offer the manual. I mean...just for those who love it. How can it have "sport" on it if it doesn't have a manual option. That said...with that much power I'd much rather have an automatic, if it can stand up to that power for 75,000 miles. The first sign of rain you'd have to run the lightning home or else you're just gonna spin out across intersections.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
edtahaney
Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150
36
02-27-2017 06:32 PM
rigo sosa
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
01-30-2017 12:28 AM
not enoughsmoke
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
39
06-13-2015 11:58 PM
jowilker
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
11-25-2014 09:53 PM
johnmcarguy
WTB - Parts & other
0
05-12-2013 04:48 PM



Quick Reply: 2005/2006 lightning



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 AM.