considering buying 6.0 Powerstroke Van
#1
considering buying 6.0 Powerstroke Van
I'm considering a PSD van but want to hear from other owners about power, economy, etc.
I understand that the PSD in the vans are seriously detuned to only 235Hp and 440 ft lb of torque?? Why is that?
Is the V10 gas engine a better option given the detuned PSD?
I understand that the PSD in the vans are seriously detuned to only 235Hp and 440 ft lb of torque?? Why is that?
Is the V10 gas engine a better option given the detuned PSD?
#2
#5
Seems like a lame reason since they use the van front ends on class C motorhomes where the full version of the 6.0 PSD would shine! Ford needs to redesign their vans. Unfortunately US auto makers just dont do anything until they are forced to by competition.... GM doesn't even have the duramax in their vans and I hear theirs will be detuned when it comes out in 2005 due to tranny limitations (4L80E)
Where are the Japanese automakers when you need them (to kick ford and GM in the rear to force innovation??)
Where are the Japanese automakers when you need them (to kick ford and GM in the rear to force innovation??)
#6
Dieselfan, they've discussed this over at the dieselstop. According to the experts over there, you can boost the diesel to full HP by replacing the exhaust with 4" pipes and changing the chip.
However, without the intercooler, you run the risk of raising the egt too high, so you have to put in an egt gauge. There is a gentleman who is currently trying to work up an intercooler mod.
However, I haven't worried about the reduced horsepower since I saw a post from a gentlman who tows a 10,000 lb trailer. He stated that with the 4.10 axel he can tow in OD and it only shifts down on steep hills. Sounds good enough to me.
However, without the intercooler, you run the risk of raising the egt too high, so you have to put in an egt gauge. There is a gentleman who is currently trying to work up an intercooler mod.
However, I haven't worried about the reduced horsepower since I saw a post from a gentlman who tows a 10,000 lb trailer. He stated that with the 4.10 axel he can tow in OD and it only shifts down on steep hills. Sounds good enough to me.
Last edited by scientia; 02-26-2004 at 09:08 AM.
#7
Scientia,
I figured you can increase the HP and torque with a chip (I have a Egde attitude chip on my Duramax Diesel), but as you say without the intercooler, you're asking for trouble.
The other question is whether or not the tranny can handle the additional torque. Do you know if the vans have a different tranny from the f350's and 250's
I figured you can increase the HP and torque with a chip (I have a Egde attitude chip on my Duramax Diesel), but as you say without the intercooler, you're asking for trouble.
The other question is whether or not the tranny can handle the additional torque. Do you know if the vans have a different tranny from the f350's and 250's
Trending Topics
#10
Originally posted by scientia
Dieselfan, they've discussed this over at the dieselstop. According to the experts over there, you can boost the diesel to full HP by replacing the exhaust with 4" pipes and changing the chip.
However, without the intercooler, you run the risk of raising the egt too high, so you have to put in an egt gauge. There is a gentleman who is currently trying to work up an intercooler mod.
However, I haven't worried about the reduced horsepower since I saw a post from a gentlman who tows a 10,000 lb trailer. He stated that with the 4.10 axel he can tow in OD and it only shifts down on steep hills. Sounds good enough to me.
Dieselfan, they've discussed this over at the dieselstop. According to the experts over there, you can boost the diesel to full HP by replacing the exhaust with 4" pipes and changing the chip.
However, without the intercooler, you run the risk of raising the egt too high, so you have to put in an egt gauge. There is a gentleman who is currently trying to work up an intercooler mod.
However, I haven't worried about the reduced horsepower since I saw a post from a gentlman who tows a 10,000 lb trailer. He stated that with the 4.10 axel he can tow in OD and it only shifts down on steep hills. Sounds good enough to me.
#11
Originally posted by Dieselfan
Seems like a lame reason since they use the van front ends on class C motorhomes where the full version of the 6.0 PSD would shine!
Seems like a lame reason since they use the van front ends on class C motorhomes where the full version of the 6.0 PSD would shine!
#12
Maybe you can answer a question, Ken. Is the doghouse (engine cover) larger with the V10 than with the V8? I've been wondering if the V10 intrudes further into the interior.
Well, my only problem with getting the V10 is that Ford only offers it with a 4 speed OD auto and I wasn't thrilled with the 4 speed OD auto on my Dodge van.
Basically, a 4.10 axel won't let the V10 rev high enough to develop its normal power. One of the things that I have thought about is the possibility of getting the V10 and having an underdrive unit installed.
However, I am a bit concerned about miles. I was putting 20,000 miles a year on my Dodge van. Any idea how long the V10 should last?
Well, my only problem with getting the V10 is that Ford only offers it with a 4 speed OD auto and I wasn't thrilled with the 4 speed OD auto on my Dodge van.
Basically, a 4.10 axel won't let the V10 rev high enough to develop its normal power. One of the things that I have thought about is the possibility of getting the V10 and having an underdrive unit installed.
However, I am a bit concerned about miles. I was putting 20,000 miles a year on my Dodge van. Any idea how long the V10 should last?
#13
I don't think cost is the main reason for the lack of diesels on Class C motorhomes.
The Ford class C motorhome is built on a 350 or 450 van chassis.
The Ford class A motorhome is built on a 550 truck chassis. Ford only offers the class A motorhome chassis with 6.8L V10, 5.38 axel, and 4 speed auto.
Surely cost wouldn't be a factor on a Class A motorhome that sells for a minimum of $65,000. Even the larger Class C's will go this high.
I'm guessing that two other factors are to blame. First, van sales in general are very low volume; motorhome chassis sales are even smaller. There is probably little incentive for Ford to work at changing the design. Secondly, a lot of buyers objected to the noisier diesels up front (I guess they don't matter so much in back). Quieter diesels are fairly recent.
The Ford class C motorhome is built on a 350 or 450 van chassis.
The Ford class A motorhome is built on a 550 truck chassis. Ford only offers the class A motorhome chassis with 6.8L V10, 5.38 axel, and 4 speed auto.
Surely cost wouldn't be a factor on a Class A motorhome that sells for a minimum of $65,000. Even the larger Class C's will go this high.
I'm guessing that two other factors are to blame. First, van sales in general are very low volume; motorhome chassis sales are even smaller. There is probably little incentive for Ford to work at changing the design. Secondly, a lot of buyers objected to the noisier diesels up front (I guess they don't matter so much in back). Quieter diesels are fairly recent.
#14
#15
Originally posted by scientia
Maybe you can answer a question, Ken. Is the doghouse (engine cover) larger with the V10 than with the V8? I've been wondering if the V10 intrudes further into the interior.
Maybe you can answer a question, Ken. Is the doghouse (engine cover) larger with the V10 than with the V8? I've been wondering if the V10 intrudes further into the interior.
Originally posted by scientia
Well, my only problem with getting the V10 is that Ford only offers it with a 4 speed OD auto and I wasn't thrilled with the 4 speed OD auto on my Dodge van.
Well, my only problem with getting the V10 is that Ford only offers it with a 4 speed OD auto and I wasn't thrilled with the 4 speed OD auto on my Dodge van.
Originally posted by scientia
Basically, a 4.10 axel won't let the V10 rev high enough to develop its normal power. One of the things that I have thought about is the possibility of getting the V10 and having an underdrive unit installed.
Basically, a 4.10 axel won't let the V10 rev high enough to develop its normal power. One of the things that I have thought about is the possibility of getting the V10 and having an underdrive unit installed.
The torque peak is fairly low on the V-10 and even though it revs to 5250, to me the motor starts running out of wind around 4500. That might be due to the restrictive air intake, but I think it's actually the heads not flowing so well at that high an rpm. The newer models had better airflow through a new manifold and head design. The 3 valve V-10 should be a rev monster, but I'm happy with the torque curve as it is, it works well for me.
Originally posted by scientia
However, I am a bit concerned about miles. I was putting 20,000 miles a year on my Dodge van. Any idea how long the V10 should last?
However, I am a bit concerned about miles. I was putting 20,000 miles a year on my Dodge van. Any idea how long the V10 should last?