Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Toyota Takes Ford to #3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-23-2004, 09:48 PM
455 Jet's Avatar
455 Jet
455 Jet is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toyota Takes Ford to #3

Ford has some decision making to do. Don't get me wrong, I love my truck and the Ford reputation, but in national news today, Toyota has claimed the #2 spot in worldwide truck sales moving Ford to #3. Chevy is #1. Is standard performance the biggest issue Ford has to tackle?
 
  #2  
Old 01-23-2004, 11:27 PM
ck1404's Avatar
ck1404
ck1404 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
No - quality is a huge issue here. GM undercuts the price - Toyota wins on quality and people will still pay more for quality products. Better quality, better profits - at least something like it used to be - would be a major step in the right direction for Ford. I for one think the cost-cutting to keep the company alive has hit all the way down to the consumer.

Bringing back a Taurus that is industry setting again would also help a lot. Seems like Ford has given up the U.S. car market. Maybe the latest new car intros will help - sounds like the new engines to resurrect this new car era will be after the introduction. I don't think Ford can get away with that any more.

A new Ranger would help a bunch too - the old frame would even be OK, but please fix the drivetrain. Even bring back the old 302cid V-8? It would probably get better gas mileage than this not so good V-6 offering of late assuming the transmission was done right.

Guess I could go on and on. Hope the new F-150 resurrects the Big Blue emblem. Hard to figure how it will considering that it's a power struggle of technology - a nice new engine defeated by all that extra weight.

Hope I'm wrong, but I think Ford is not in a very good position in terms of competition here. I haven't even mentioned the Nissan Titan or what is rumored to be a major new Toyota truck player to be introducted soon with a new, powerful engine. Ford might should have saved a little of all that money spent on foreign acquisitions that still can't be profitable (Volvo excluded) and reinvested that money in it's core U.S. market products. I think all of us Ford owners are paying for Ford's failed attempt to be number one and as a result of this financial management failure, Ford is number three.

Just my two cents. I'm a big Ford fan and have owned Ford trucks for literally forever. Sure glad I don't need to make an immediate decision on a new truck because I simply cannot find anything in the Ford offerings that I like, especially considering the prices and what continues to look like shakey initial quality. (I'm having a hard time getting past how the new diesel was ever released and why it has taken so long to fix it.) Not a good fuzzy feeling, Ford.
 
  #3  
Old 01-24-2004, 06:43 AM
J. E. Ray's Avatar
J. E. Ray
J. E. Ray is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toyota will be making a larger 1/2 and 3/4 ton trucks. They are building a plant in TX. now. They have an inline six diesel they are going to use also.
Honda is also playing around with the idea of a 1/2 ton also.
 
  #4  
Old 01-24-2004, 01:52 PM
1956MarkII's Avatar
1956MarkII
1956MarkII is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Safety Harbor, FL USA
Posts: 7,745
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The numbers are based on world-wide sales, with Toyota including the Hino line of heavy-duty trucks in these figures. My question is this: if Toyota's including Hino because they happen to own them, is Ford including Jaguar, Volvo, Land Rover, etc... in their numbers, or is it just Ford-badged products? Does anyone know?
 
  #5  
Old 01-24-2004, 05:19 PM
superdutyspv's Avatar
superdutyspv
superdutyspv is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toyota wouldn't know a full size truck if it bet 'em in their ****!
 
  #6  
Old 01-24-2004, 05:59 PM
trucksforever's Avatar
trucksforever
trucksforever is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats good.
 
  #7  
Old 01-24-2004, 07:03 PM
92f150I6's Avatar
92f150I6
92f150I6 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by 1956MarkII
The numbers are based on world-wide sales, with Toyota including the Hino line of heavy-duty trucks in these figures. My question is this: if Toyota's including Hino because they happen to own them, is Ford including Jaguar, Volvo, Land Rover, etc... in their numbers, or is it just Ford-badged products? Does anyone know?
Exactly. Do they count the big rig trucks?
 
  #8  
Old 01-24-2004, 08:31 PM
ck1404's Avatar
ck1404
ck1404 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I don't think it matters. Yes, the Toyota Corporation, includes the entire family. I also think that the Ford numbers include the entire family, including the "Premier" auto group - in other words Jaguar, Volvo, Rover, etc. These perceptions are based on researching the stock of these companies along with the rest of the industry leaders. Does Ford count their big rig trucks? Yes, I do think so.
 
  #9  
Old 01-24-2004, 09:09 PM
MW95F250's Avatar
MW95F250
MW95F250 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is Sterling truck a part of Ford? I see a bunch of them all over the place, I mean they should be a part of Ford, using Ford Louisville Cabs and chassis'.
 
  #10  
Old 01-24-2004, 09:49 PM
ck1404's Avatar
ck1404
ck1404 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I don't think Sterling is a part of Ford anymore although Ford may still own an interest in the company. In terms of the total Sterling vehicle being included in Ford total sales - I doubt it.
 
  #11  
Old 01-24-2004, 11:36 PM
ultramax21's Avatar
ultramax21
ultramax21 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about ford tractors, are they included? I know it's now New Holland, but there are tons of Ford farm tractors scattered around the U.S.
 
  #12  
Old 01-25-2004, 01:41 AM
Smokem''s Avatar
Smokem'
Smokem' is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Missouri
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well i don't mean to rip of fords here, but underpowered is in my opinion the biggest problem for the biggest yet, f-150. Heck a prototype chevy colorado is going to come with 350hp in that lil truck. I think it's time my next f-150 come with at least 400hp.?????? can i get an amen? Also the low numbers are a result of a declining car market as well as car promotion.
 
  #13  
Old 01-25-2004, 11:32 AM
MW95F250's Avatar
MW95F250
MW95F250 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hopefully the new line of cars and other vehicles will help Ford to regain #2. I don't know if anybody will ever overtake Generic Motors though, they seem to just keep buying up the little guys to inflate their sales numbers.
 
  #14  
Old 01-25-2004, 03:24 PM
Hi Ho's Avatar
Hi Ho
Hi Ho is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Horsepower is not everytyhing. I am sick of hearing people who think horsepower is all that matters. More power, more power, more power. Who needs 400 horsepower? Unless your towing a very large travel trailer. You do not need that much. My Honda Civic hasn't gone 360,000 miles with me driving it hard and stomping on the gas. It is a wste of gas and money to have such huge engines. Yes I do have a 460 in my 77 F-250 but I do tow a large trailer and heavy loads. I don't need it to go super fast.
 
  #15  
Old 01-25-2004, 07:17 PM
78fordman's Avatar
78fordman
78fordman is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jefferson, Iowa
Posts: 2,833
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
well, people look at numbers, the charts could look like mountains, thats where the 6.0, and other ford motors have an advantage, the chart looks like my states landscape, flat. 6.0 Compared to the duramax, on the charts, there should be no comparison in a towing contest. Sure the 6.0 is a high winder, but the torque band starts at pretty low rpms, and stay steady up still something like 3800 RPM. Sure it is not a good idea to wind the **** out of a diesel, but it would win in a pulling contest, if if you were in a bind with a trailor. My point is the duramax and the powerstroke 6.0 has about the same low end torque, i have not seen any new charts for the 590 ftlb's motor, but i bet it looks like the first version. Sure some chevy motors might have higher peak numbers, but look where they make it. The 300 would be a nice comeback for the F-150, put some higher flowing heads on it, a decent size cam, and six in a row will make it go.
 

Last edited by 78fordman; 01-25-2004 at 07:24 PM.


Quick Reply: Toyota Takes Ford to #3



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:55 AM.