When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Sorry if this is a dumb technical question - I've never seen it discussed.
The GM heavy duty trucks added an automatic 4wd option. I had something similar on my F-150 Lariat (4A) and it was awesome for bad roads. I always assumed it would only be a half-ton feature, but apparently not. I would love to have it on my next Superduty.
Does anyone know why Ford doesn't have such an option yet?
Where are you getting your information? I just went over to the Chevy website and built a 2022 Silverado 2500HD and a 3500HD. The only drive options were 2WD and 4WD. There was no All Wheel Drive or Automatic 4 wheel drive option.
Page 242: "AUTO (Automatic Four-Wheel Drive): Use when road surface conditions are variable. When driving in AUTO, the front axle is engaged, and the vehicle's power is sent to the front and rear wheels automatically based on driving conditions. This setting provides slightly lower fuel economy than 2."
It's a game changer because it's nearly as good as 4-high, but without the downsides, especially when switching between dry pavement and snow/ice.
I've never seen it in a GM HD, but the 1/2 tons had it. Chevy even has an auto and 4 hi only T-case available. In 2019, when I was ordering a GM 1/2 ton, had to get GMC, as adding the tow package on the Chevy kicked out the 2sp t-case.
Game changer for people who do not know how to properly use 4wd? It is no mare than a reactionary engagement of a traditional part time t-case. Knowing when you need 4wd and selecting it is the same thing but better because you can see the road conditions. The electronic system can not and can only react after slip has occurred. People that switch in and out of 4wd a lot probably do so unnecessarily. Relying on blind electronics and adding another layer of complexity to the vehicles systems isn't something I would be at all interested in personally.
It is no mare than a reactionary engagement of a traditional part time t-case. Knowing when you need 4wd and selecting it is the same thing but better because you can see the road conditions. The electronic system can not and can only react after slip has occurred. Relying on blind electronics and adding another layer of complexity to the vehicles systems isn't something I would be at all interested in personally.
I have 4a in my 21 F150.
As I understand it its actually the OPPOSITE of what you state.
Its basically in 4hi and if it senses binding it disengages the front hubs(not the transfer case). The F150, as I understand it, has the same front vacuum hub system as the superduty, but they arent manually selectable.
Game changer for people who do not know how to properly use 4wd? It is no mare than a reactionary engagement of a traditional part time t-case. Knowing when you need 4wd and selecting it is the same thing but better because you can see the road conditions. The electronic system can not and can only react after slip has occurred. People that switch in and out of 4wd a lot probably do so unnecessarily. Relying on blind electronics and adding another layer of complexity to the vehicles systems isn't something I would be at all interested in personally.
I understand where you're coming from, but I when I had it, it was great. No more binding at the boat ramp, and if road conditions are questionable, there was little downside to engaging it. Especially since these new trucks are so light in the rear end.
TFL truck tested a 4-auto system on a snowy hill, and it was as effective as 4H. Sure, 4H was technically and immeasurably better in the test case, but in the real world, it's handy to have.
For sure not a deal-breaker, just wondering why Ford implemented it in the F-150 Lariat but not the SuperDuty's. Cost? Technical complexity? Other?
As I understand it its actually the OPPOSITE of what you state.
Its basically in 4hi and if it senses binding it disengages the front hubs(not the transfer case). The F150, as I understand it, has the same front vacuum hub system as the superduty, but they arent manually selectable.
"Autotrac active two-speed transfer case on 4x4 models electronically controls “4 Auto” mode, allowing the truck to seamlessly shift between two-wheel drive and four-wheel drive based on road conditions."
TFL truck tested a 4-auto system on a snowy hill, and it was as effective as 4H. Sure, 4H was technically and immeasurably better in the test case, but in the real world, it's handy to have.
Because the transfer case is in 4hi... so its 4hi...
it doesnt auto engage, it auto disengages the front hubs. Again, how I understand it works on the F150.
"Autotrac active two-speed transfer case on 4x4 models electronically controls “4 Auto” mode, allowing the truck to seamlessly shift between two-wheel drive and four-wheel drive based on road conditions."
im not talking about the GM system... im talking about the FORD system...
I have no clue how the GM system works, never looked into it, never cared to.
ETA: GM system says it uses clutches to transfer power up front in auto mode.
I understand where you're coming from, but I when I had it, it was great. No more binding at the boat ramp, and if road conditions are questionable, there was little downside to engaging it. Especially since these new trucks are so light in the rear end.
TFL truck tested a 4-auto system on a snowy hill, and it was as effective as 4H. Sure, 4H was technically and immeasurably better in the test case, but in the real world, it's handy to have.
For sure not a deal-breaker, just wondering why Ford implemented it in the F-150 Lariat but not the SuperDuty's. Cost? Technical complexity? Other?
Probably durability. The system relies on clutches to engage the t-case, may be that sending 1050 lb ft through one isn't a great idea. That and likely a lack of demand but the demographic for trucks has changed and more and more car drivers are wanting carlike features on their trucks. It will probably happen sooner than later.
I had the system in an Expedition, tried it, didn't like it. As I mentioned it is reactionary and I can be proactive. I mean how hard is it to turn the **** for 4x4 on or off? Handy, or a lazy persons default for when they do not really want to actively participate in the art of driving a vehicle? The more things like this we add to vehicles the worse drivers get. Heck I would have killed to get manual hubs and a manual shift lever in my truck. Going 4 auto is completely the wrong direction for my needs and wants on a truck.
Personally I would love to have this. Where I live the roads are often wet and the temp near, at or just below freezing so there's potential for black ice. You just never know. I don't want to put it in 4WD the whole commute due to binding but a 4WD auto option would solve that.
Now if the roads were pure ice or snow, sure i'd shift in to 4WD and leave it there as I wouldn't have to deal with binding and the road conditions warrant it. But most often there are spots of black ice and you just don't know.
Modern 4WD auto or AWD systems work very well and extremely fast.
Personally I would love to have this. Where I live the roads are often wet and the temp near, at or just below freezing so there's potential for black ice. You just never know. I don't want to put it in 4WD the whole commute due to binding but a 4WD auto would solve that.
Now if the roads were pure ice or snow, sure i'd shift in to 4WD and leave it there as I wouldn't have to deal with binding and the road conditions warrant it. But most often there are spots of black ice and you just don't know.
Modern 4WD auto or AWD systems work very well and extremely fast.
How does 4wd HELP on black ice? You would be MUCH better off in 2wd and reliant on the traction control system. Part time 4wd on black ice is an invitation to lose control. Binding 4wd? Are the corners that tight? The other day I dove 90 miles home from sledding in 4wd by accident. The road was snow covered when I started. I drove 80 miles of pavement before realizing it was still in 4wd. Never once did I notice any "binding": of the system taking place. I have driven on winter roads for over 30 years. This system is just another dumbing down of driver skills.
How does 4wd HELP on black ice? You would be MUCH better off in 2wd and reliant on the traction control system. Part time 4wd on black ice is an invitation to lose control. Binding 4wd? Are the corners that tight? The other day I dove 90 miles home from sledding in 4wd by accident. The road was snow covered when I started. I drove 80 miles of pavement before realizing it was still in 4wd. Never once did I notice any "binding": of the system taking place. I have driven on winter roads for over 30 years. This system is just another dumbing down of driver skills.
It helps a lot. It's not like it's a sheet of ice. It's spots of varying sizes. When it comes to black ice you simply don't know. So if you start slipping chances are another tire can grip on a non icy spot. I have also driven on winter roads for 30 years but i'm not opposed to new technology and tools to make my job easier and safer. And yes, i've had binding.
This system most definitely, without a doubt, helps. It does not hinder me and I can still apply my knowledge and experience.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.