Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2-speed on the driveshaft, or E40D?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-20-2019, 10:10 PM
RenoHuskerDu's Avatar
RenoHuskerDu
RenoHuskerDu is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,370
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
2-speed on the driveshaft, or E40D?

This might be a crazy idea. Our 89 F250 2wd is a peach, only 103k miles on her, no cracks in the interior, strong running 7.3 in front of a C6. It runs out of gears fast. Being a truck driver, I'm familiar with Brownie gearboxes etc.

Has anybody here added a second gearbox on the driveshaft behind the tranny? It would have to vacuum shift or similar, because there's no declutching to shift given the C6 up front.
 
  #2  
Old 05-21-2019, 02:22 AM
Mudsport96's Avatar
Mudsport96
Mudsport96 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chillicothe
Posts: 3,282
Received 372 Likes on 285 Posts
I'm sure gear vendors has a unit for a c6

https://www.gearvendors.com/f2wd3s.html
 
  #3  
Old 05-21-2019, 08:43 AM
RenoHuskerDu's Avatar
RenoHuskerDu
RenoHuskerDu is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,370
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Thanks for the thought, but if I had $10 for every time somebody's warned me about GV's bad attitude, I could do an oil change on my truck. Seems they have generated serious resentment. I'll pass.
 
  #4  
Old 05-21-2019, 09:28 AM
Bruce W.'s Avatar
Bruce W.
Bruce W. is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 238
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by RenoHuskerDu
Thanks for the thought, but if I had $10 for every time somebody's warned me about GV's bad attitude, I could do an oil change on my truck. Seems they have generated serious resentment. I'll pass.
I've had a GV unit in my '97 F350 4X4, 460, ZF5 for 98K miles or so. Zero mechanical problems...a few minor elec connection glitches...but trouble-free. I've talked with the techs at GV a few times about service intervals and which synthetic lubes are acceptable...they were courteous, knowledgeable and helpful. I'm absolutely satisfied with everything about GV. Please explain "GV's bad attitude"...this is not a rhetorical question...I seek info. Thanks.
 
  #5  
Old 05-21-2019, 11:05 AM
RenoHuskerDu's Avatar
RenoHuskerDu
RenoHuskerDu is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,370
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
I asked FTE about them a couple years back when I was deciding what to do with our 4 spd Bullnose (now has a ZF5). I got the comments back about their bad attitude, specifically with regards to outlandish parts prices. It would be searchable under my username. Have you needed service on yours yet?
 
  #6  
Old 05-21-2019, 11:08 AM
RenoHuskerDu's Avatar
RenoHuskerDu
RenoHuskerDu is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,370
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
From oilburners:

I am not real fond of the GV for a truck application, though I'll admit that I've never owned one nor worked with one much, and many have had good luck with them.

GV design was originally a Laycock overdrive built for mid 60's British sports cars and subsequently used on other cars as well. It's designed to give a top end high gear for high speed, ie what you'd want in a sports car and also to be easy and smooth the shift. High load, low speed shifting, etc were not factors in the original design. GV beefed up the design some, but it still shares that genesis.

The GV shifts with a hydraulically/spring shifted cone clutch - hydraulic for OD, spring for direct. The hydraulic pressure is generated by a pump off the input side of the gearbox. Line pressure and volume are thus effected by road speed, which is why it's not recommended to shift into od below a certain speed - something like 35 mph IIRC. Below this it may shift, but could be slower (ie more clutch slippage due to being in between gears) and not have enough pressure (not a strong of a clutch force, slippage under load) Thus, using it as a gear splitter is limited, and you have to be careful lugging down in od. Engine braking too could be an issue in OD, since any slippage will reduce the speed of the input side, reducing pressure, causing more slippage..... Low order probability, but worth considering.

At the end of the day, the GV is good when used as designed - as a selectable extra top end gear under light to moderate load. It's not the best option if you're towing heavy, or wanting a gear splitter.
 
  #7  
Old 05-21-2019, 11:10 AM
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
ford390gashog is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brentwood,CA
Posts: 26,006
Received 519 Likes on 398 Posts
Originally Posted by RenoHuskerDu
This might be a crazy idea. Our 89 F250 2wd is a peach, only 103k miles on her, no cracks in the interior, strong running 7.3 in front of a C6. It runs out of gears fast. Being a truck driver, I'm familiar with Brownie gearboxes etc.

Has anybody here added a second gearbox on the driveshaft behind the tranny? It would have to vacuum shift or similar, because there's no declutching to shift given the C6 up front.
Easier to just dump the C6 and install a built E4OD with 4R100 updates. Can't shift a brownie without the ability to float the gears which isn't happening with a C6, even worse the C6 will start to generate a ton of heat as it has no lock up torque converter. I have been the GV route twice and both times the units ended up being pulled for repairs and they ultimately swapped completely.
 
  #8  
Old 05-21-2019, 12:03 PM
JakeHan's Avatar
JakeHan
JakeHan is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You could do an aux. with an auto, there were lots of 2 ton Chevys in the 70s with Allison’s and 2 speed rears,and I’ve worked on and around some older Paystar class 8s that had HT750s 2-speed air-shift tandems. BUT, you didn’t really split shift em, just ran them through the gears to direct, let off the power and shifted to high, then rolled back into the throttle, using them as 1 more gear. I’d say an E4OD with a stand alone controller would be simpler and easier.... since it’s a 2wd, you’d have room for a MD Allison, if you chose, too.....
 
  #9  
Old 05-21-2019, 12:05 PM
RenoHuskerDu's Avatar
RenoHuskerDu
RenoHuskerDu is offline
Cargo Master
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2,370
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by ford390gashog
Easier to just dump the C6 and install a built E4OD with 4R100 updates.
SNIP
.
Then how to control the E40D? My 89 IDI has no engine computer. The E in E40D is for electronic, right?
I found these guys but no info on replacing a C6. http://www.transmissiontuner.com
 
  #10  
Old 05-21-2019, 01:34 PM
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
ford390gashog is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brentwood,CA
Posts: 26,006
Received 519 Likes on 398 Posts
Originally Posted by RenoHuskerDu
Then how to control the E40D? My 89 IDI has no engine computer. The E in E40D is for electronic, right?
I found these guys but no info on replacing a C6. http://www.transmissiontuner.com

Very simple, for the last 15 or so years you have been able to buy stand alone controllers. They have gotten better and the shifting exceeds anything ford did factory. I used US Shift when I did my E4OD swap in my 68.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
teamtestbot
1968-Present E-Series Van/Cutaway/Chassis
25
03-06-2018 01:40 PM
Danger_Dave
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
08-20-2008 05:18 AM
73cuda
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
24
10-22-2007 07:13 PM
fling
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
08-08-2005 09:38 AM



Quick Reply: 2-speed on the driveshaft, or E40D?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 AM.