New Bronco: Everything We Know So Far
By Geoffrey Piehl

There could be a 2-door AND a 4-door version of the Bronco.

 

Yes, that about sums it up. There could be a 2-door and a 4-door. And it might be powered by unicorn fairies that emit rainbows for exhaust.

This "article" doesn't even reach the low bar of "lazy", and the inclusion of it here is embarassing.

 

I am positive when real new info is out on the Bronco. This forum will light up like a Christmas tree. For now not so much.

 

Wow they've managed to sum up the last 5 threads in this section.... about a month later.... lol want a cookie?

 

...and do nothing but reprint the uninformed, wild *** guesses from other sites. Not to mention some random pics of stuff that has no known relationship to the Bronco. The article should be titled, "What everyone else is guessing about the Bronco".

Exhibit 1, a picture of a rugged landscape with the Bronco logo, the word "Bronco", and "Coming in 2020".
Exhibit 2, a picture of a Bronco of five generations past. Nothing to do with the "new" Bronco.
Exhibit 3, a picture of a concept vehicle from over 15 years ago. Nothing to do with the "new" Bronco.
Exhibit 4, a rendering - that is, somebody else's wild *** guess - of what a Bronco might look like. Maybe.
Exhibit 5, a picture of a current-generation Ford Ranger, which has nothing to do with the new Bronco.
Exhibit 6, another rendering of... well, you get the picture.
Exhibit 7, a patent application that nobody outside of Ford knows if it will be offered on a Bronco .
Exhibit 8, a diagram of an engine that could maybe, possibly, be an offering in the Bronco.
Exhibit 9, wait.. what? Another renderguess cut-and-paste from another forum?

There are absolutely no "things we know" here. It's lazy, uninformative, speculative fluff.

 

OK sir, you've made your point twice.

There is no new info and there's not much we can about that. The author is simply trying to start a CIVIL discussion. Participate in a CIVIL manner or keep scrolling.

 

The author is an IB member and if he had read the last 5 topics here he would've known this has already been stated multiple times and has been discussed to no end. We don't need to keep beating a dead horse with a new topic made by the owners of the website.

 

Yes sir I'm well aware of all of that. The info isn't new because there isn't any new info. But, he's trying to get a civil conversation started.

 

Which has already been started multiple times with multiple previous threads lol and since like you said there's no new info; this thread was worthless.

 

I didn't think I was less than civil, but anyone posting on the Internet should expect a certain level of criticism - deserved or not.

Everybody has the power to keep scrolling.

 

My best guess is we all are getting over excited to see what the heck is taking so long. Going over old material is were we keep beating a dead horse. Lol lol

 

Agreed. I have to say I'm frustrated every time I see something published by a once-trusted source, and find it's only old rehashed conjecture.

I have to keep reminding myself that it's all just somebody else's interpretation until I'm standing in front of one.