F350 rear tire pressure
#31
As near as I can tell, the inflation tables are generic, set by TRA (Tire and Rim Association). I've used the inflation tables published on the Toyo website in the past. The doc specifically says the numbers came from TRA. The doc can be found attached to this post or using this URL: https://www.toyotires.com/media/2125...s_20170203.pdf
Looking at size 275/65R20:
The cheapest tire at TireRack for the Super Duty is the Sumitomo Encounter Highway Tire...$189...max load is 3,750
The most expensive is the Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac in on/off road commercial traction...$334...max load is 3,750
2 completely different tires...same load rating.
Common sense would suggest that one of those tires has an actual (unpublished) higher load rating that the other at 80 lbs. But which one?
Tire manufacturers engineer and construct tires to meet their own personal standard as long as they meet a specified minimum.
#32
#33
This is exactly what I do in the winter, and 80 in the summer when I'm hauling the camper. I know I'm close to that thresh hold for the TPMS.
#35
#36
For example, the 80 psi load rating for the LT275/65R18E tires on our F350 is 3415 lbs.
HTH,
Jim / crewzer
#38
#39
First - I have looked, with no success, for an inflation chart that I can use. All the charts I can find are intended for commercial trucks with commercial tires. __I would really appreciate a link to a non-commercial chart for my stock Michelin tires.
I run my tires at the specified 70 front and 65 rear. Just replaced all six at 85,000 miles. Remaining tread depth was 3mm which is above the legal limit, but too shallow for winter driving in my opinion.
I run my tires at the specified 70 front and 65 rear. Just replaced all six at 85,000 miles. Remaining tread depth was 3mm which is above the legal limit, but too shallow for winter driving in my opinion.
#40
#41
#42
I'd run 60 front and no more than 55 rear (even with the sand) -
or there abouts - I'd be in that range (60-65 front) and (55-60 rear) and you will be fine. 700 is decent amount of weight in rear which has its pros and cons as has been discussed on here. My personal opinion only--- barring an application like plowing where you are putting weight in the back to counteract the weight on the front - you have to be careful, weight can help and hurt, especially too much. 700 - 1000 hanging in the back is snow plow weight territory. I'd be no more than 500, and play with the pressures. Let the tires and studs do the work they were designed too - the more weight you add the more you have to stop and on a turn if the rear starts to slide, you have that much more momentum helping to swing you around even more; and you are pulling weight off the front.
or there abouts - I'd be in that range (60-65 front) and (55-60 rear) and you will be fine. 700 is decent amount of weight in rear which has its pros and cons as has been discussed on here. My personal opinion only--- barring an application like plowing where you are putting weight in the back to counteract the weight on the front - you have to be careful, weight can help and hurt, especially too much. 700 - 1000 hanging in the back is snow plow weight territory. I'd be no more than 500, and play with the pressures. Let the tires and studs do the work they were designed too - the more weight you add the more you have to stop and on a turn if the rear starts to slide, you have that much more momentum helping to swing you around even more; and you are pulling weight off the front.
#44
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
54LFL
2017+ Super Duty
14
03-02-2020 11:55 AM
whododat
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
11-22-2005 04:37 PM