B&W companion with 1/2' mat: Anyone installed one?
#1
B&W companion with 1/2' mat: Anyone installed one?
I am outfitting a new 2019 f450 with a Companion base for factory installed pucks. I also want to protect the entire bed with a rubber mat of 1/2". Can't find a mat with precut puck and gooseneck holes. Has anyone done this install? If so, cut out of just the holes or cut a larger rectangle the size of the entire base, or, ???
#4
#5
#7
[QUOTE=lariatbob;18398101]Here is mine with a Bedrug. Only cut out the puck holes as I will probably never use the Gooseneck and can cut it out if I ever do.
Of course the Bedrug foam will be much easier to cut than rubber mat, but you get the idea.[/QUOTe
thanks @lariatbob and others foryour insight, I wasn't sure if the companion rails would bottom out on the rubber and interfere with a solid metal to metal torque downat the four attachment puck posts.
Of course the Bedrug foam will be much easier to cut than rubber mat, but you get the idea.[/QUOTe
thanks @lariatbob and others foryour insight, I wasn't sure if the companion rails would bottom out on the rubber and interfere with a solid metal to metal torque downat the four attachment puck posts.
Trending Topics
#9
OK, I see what you did on the doughnut cuts, looks nice. But, when I put my companion into the pucks without any mat, the clearance between the metal bed and the Companion was less than 1/4" at all places other than where the puck holes are. My concern was that while the pucks may be fully engaged, the Companion base is resting on the rubber mat and prohibiting metal to metal torque due to the metal resting on the rubber. Maybe that is an OK thing though. Any concerns that this could give an unstable connection when torqued to 80#?
#11
OK, I see what you did on the doughnut cuts, looks nice. But, when I put my companion into the pucks without any mat, the clearance between the metal bed and the Companion was less than 1/4" at all places other than where the puck holes are. My concern was that while the pucks may be fully engaged, the Companion base is resting on the rubber mat and prohibiting metal to metal torque due to the metal resting on the rubber. Maybe that is an OK thing though. Any concerns that this could give an unstable connection when torqued to 80#?
#12
see the documents here https://www.bwtrailerhitches.com/pro...ion-ford-pucks
#13
OK, I see what you did on the doughnut cuts, looks nice. But, when I put my companion into the pucks without any mat, the clearance between the metal bed and the Companion was less than 1/4" at all places other than where the puck holes are. My concern was that while the pucks may be fully engaged, the Companion base is resting on the rubber mat and prohibiting metal to metal torque due to the metal resting on the rubber. Maybe that is an OK thing though. Any concerns that this could give an unstable connection when torqued to 80#?
only the arms are torqued to 80 ft/lbs that isn't affected by anything else.. this base is REALLY strong
#14
the 4 bolts on each side that hold the arms for the head to the base.
see the documents here https://www.bwtrailerhitches.com/pro...ion-ford-pucks
see the documents here https://www.bwtrailerhitches.com/pro...ion-ford-pucks
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ibuzzard
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
21
05-30-2019 11:38 AM