7.3L / 6.8L V8 Gasoline Engines Discuss the new 7.3 and 6.8L Gasoline V8s

How real are the rumors of the 7.3L gas V8?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-07-2018, 10:09 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD's Avatar
640 CI Aluminum FORD
640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,311
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
How real are the rumors of the 7.3L gas V8?

I've heard rumors for awhile now that Ford is going to produce a 7.0L (recently heard 7.3L) gas V8 to either replace or bridge the gap between the 6.2L and 6.7L diesel. Anyone have any additional information about this?
 
  #2  
Old 12-07-2018, 11:33 PM
BillyE's Avatar
BillyE
BillyE is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,592
Received 202 Likes on 111 Posts
It may only be a replacement for the 6.8 V10, based on what I’ve seen. Too soon to tell. Maybe some else has better info.
 
  #3  
Old 12-08-2018, 07:28 AM
harmanrk's Avatar
harmanrk
harmanrk is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Lansing MI
Posts: 782
Received 71 Likes on 37 Posts
I have been in the Windsor engine plant where it is being built. Most of the machines are in, but still being debugged. The initial objective for Godzilla (the code name for the engine) will be to replace the 20+ year old V10. Where is goes from there is only guesswork. It may someday find its way into some special Mustang, or Raptor type application, but for now, it is a low volume line, meaning they are not building the capacity at this time to completely replace the 6.2L
 
  #4  
Old 12-08-2018, 08:26 AM
F350 1990's Avatar
F350 1990
F350 1990 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 1,630
Received 63 Likes on 51 Posts
The Romeo/Windsor operations need to move from evolutionary ( 4.6L, 5.4L to 6.8L evolution) and move up the curve.......................my guess is the 7.X will continue in that incremental evolution ---- others (Mazda, GM) are moving out with new gas designs --- making their designs closer to diesels.........Ford is lagging.....
 
  #5  
Old 12-08-2018, 08:37 AM
HST's Avatar
HST
HST is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: COLORADO, USA
Posts: 448
Received 36 Likes on 25 Posts
I hope it's a beast of a gasoline engine!
 
  #6  
Old 12-08-2018, 08:54 AM
Section179's Avatar
Section179
Section179 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 1,503
Received 160 Likes on 88 Posts
If they do chassis cab only that seems like a perfect excuse to me to do an f550 super single.

Now somebody convince my wife. For some reason my charm stopped working 10 years ago.
 
  #7  
Old 12-08-2018, 11:26 AM
Dentside's Avatar
Dentside
Dentside is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 62 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by BillyE
It may only be a replacement for the 6.8 V10, based on what I’ve seen. Too soon to tell. Maybe some else has better info.
Ford can't be that deaf to the marketplace. If so GM and Fiat will eat their lunch with their upcoming 6.6/7.0 gas offerings.
Too many fleet and gov't sales to lose if they don't upgrade on the 6.2.
 
  #8  
Old 12-08-2018, 02:38 PM
harmanrk's Avatar
harmanrk
harmanrk is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Lansing MI
Posts: 782
Received 71 Likes on 37 Posts
Originally Posted by Dentside
Too many fleet and gov't sales to lose if they don't upgrade on the 6.2.
Fleet and Gov sales only care about operating and maintenance costs. The 6.2 does a good job on both. They only concerns they have about power, is does it have enough to do the job. If it moves the load, but takes 30 seconds to reach 55MPH, they could care less, that is an issue for the person behind them.
 
  #9  
Old 12-08-2018, 04:21 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD's Avatar
640 CI Aluminum FORD
640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,311
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by harmanrk
I have been in the Windsor engine plant where it is being built. Most of the machines are in, but still being debugged. The initial objective for Godzilla (the code name for the engine) will be to replace the 20+ year old V10. Where is goes from there is only guesswork. It may someday find its way into some special Mustang, or Raptor type application, but for now, it is a low volume line, meaning they are not building the capacity at this time to completely replace the 6.2L
Do we have a confirmation on displacement yet? Is it actually going to be 7.3L? If so, It would be nice if Ford would up that by 0.2 and just revive the legendary 460 V8 lol.
 
  #10  
Old 12-08-2018, 05:05 PM
MNwade's Avatar
MNwade
MNwade is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about a 6.2L ecoboost? The little 3.5 kicks out some respectable HP and torque. Would a larger version be possible?
 
  #11  
Old 12-08-2018, 05:20 PM
acadianbob's Avatar
acadianbob
acadianbob is online now
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,216
Received 530 Likes on 299 Posts
Originally Posted by MNwade
What about a 6.2L ecoboost? The little 3.5 kicks out some respectable HP and torque. Would a larger version be possible?
I think the duty cycle in the commercial market is something Ford doesn't want to do in the SD (Ecoboost)

But I sure wish they would. Awesome torque curve and altitude immune. I honestly feel that the 3.5 I had in my F150 was a stronger unit than the 6.2 in my SD.
 
  #12  
Old 12-08-2018, 07:25 PM
BillyE's Avatar
BillyE
BillyE is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,592
Received 202 Likes on 111 Posts
Originally Posted by Dentside
Ford can't be that deaf to the marketplace. If so GM and Fiat will eat their lunch with their upcoming 6.6/7.0 gas offerings.
Too many fleet and gov't sales to lose if they don't upgrade on the 6.2.
Not saying what I’d like to see, just what I have seen. Only comparisons I’ve seen are to the 6.8 (better fuel mileage; more power) and nothing to the 6.2. That makes me think it’s a replacement for the 6.8 but maybe not for the 6.2. The earlier post about the production volume backs this up as well.
 
  #13  
Old 12-09-2018, 09:34 AM
Busa 1 Dave's Avatar
Busa 1 Dave
Busa 1 Dave is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: DFW
Posts: 939
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
As pointed out above Ford is and has always been behind the power curve on gas engines. They need to move to direct injection like GM did. Ford went with the turbo ringy dingy six bangers as the "preferred gas motor" years ago and has not gotten away from it. If there is going to be a new large displacement gasoline engine it only makes sense to have direct injection.
 
  #14  
Old 12-09-2018, 09:44 AM
RandyinTN's Avatar
RandyinTN
RandyinTN is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 1,175
Received 314 Likes on 151 Posts
Originally Posted by Busa 1 Dave
As pointed out above Ford is and has always been behind the power curve on gas engines.
Seriously? What about the 2.7 and 3.5 eco boost motors? What other truck builder is doing better?
 
  #15  
Old 12-09-2018, 10:11 AM
Busa 1 Dave's Avatar
Busa 1 Dave
Busa 1 Dave is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: DFW
Posts: 939
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by RandyinTN
Seriously? What about the 2.7 and 3.5 eco boost motors? What other truck builder is doing better?
Much rather have the 5.3 or 6.2 DI motors. Have had 3 of the 6.2 DI engines (5.3 is also DI) including the highly modified LT4 on my Vette. Have several of my friends that have the 6 cyl Fords and 2 have had some problems with engines. Ford went turbo six and GM went to DI vs the 6 cyl turbo. I had a 6.2 on my Raptor and was pretty happy (modified a little) and now you get behind a new Raptor with the 6 and the exhaust sounds like someone breaking wind and with a aftermarket exhaust sounds like someone who got some bad Mexican food ..
 


Quick Reply: How real are the rumors of the 7.3L gas V8?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.