1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

Been seeing some 7.3s with newer style bodies

  #1  
Old 12-07-2018, 07:02 AM
SchaefferUSMC's Avatar
SchaefferUSMC
SchaefferUSMC is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Tennessee
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Been seeing some 7.3s with newer style bodies

I keep seeing, I think on Craigslists, some SDs with the 7.3 with what looks like a 2015 model body. I saw one with just the newer style bed with the rounded dually hips, then I saw one or two with the newer style cab. It might have been just the hood, grille, doors, and fender, or a whole cab, Im not sure.

Anyone else been seeing these? https://houston.craigslist.org/cto/d/have-1999-f350-super-duty/6755599072.html
This one doesnt seem to have the newer bed. Im Guessing there's body damage or some other issue to warrant the swap

SchaefferUSMC
 
  #2  
Old 12-07-2018, 09:42 AM
Sous's Avatar
Sous
Sous is online now
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lake Hartwell, GA
Posts: 26,008
Received 4,436 Likes on 2,839 Posts
I believe the beds are almost a direct replacement/fit.

The front is not. There are kits out there to make it work, but from what have seen they don't fit well at all. If you have the time, skill and resources they can look pretty close to OEM to the untrained eye, but not quite.

 
  #3  
Old 12-07-2018, 04:55 PM
aawlberninf350's Avatar
aawlberninf350
aawlberninf350 is online now
It's a Van Gogh
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 6,799
Received 781 Likes on 571 Posts
I've never seen a CL ad with more red flags. Pic of the door jamb tag is for a Nissan.
 
  #4  
Old 12-07-2018, 05:59 PM
Y2KW57's Avatar
Y2KW57
Y2KW57 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,664
Received 3,319 Likes on 1,741 Posts
There are several long running threads on FTE that detail, week by week, bit by bit, blow by blow, various members "conversions" from the 99-03 style to the 11-16 style. These threads I believe are upstairs, in the 1999-2016 Super Duty forum (non diesel specific).

Personally, I think it is like trying to put a 1958 Bel Air front grille, bumper, fenders, hood, and headlights... onto a 1957 Bel Air. Sure, the quad beam '58 headlights may look fancier than the '57 single beam per side, but you just don't cobble a 58 front end onto a 57 body. That's sacrilegious in the realm of automotive art, and offers no real utility, since single beams can still have dual filaments and throw just as much useful light. Why ruin the original design language that defines the vintage?

The 11-16 front clip will forever be associated with cracked radiators, contaminated C4 pumps taking out the entire injection system to the tune of 5 figures, reduced power and forced to the side of the road regens, dropped exhaust valves, electrical gremlins that would keep NASA engineers up at night trying to solve, funky Ford Sync systems, warranty denials due to water in the fuel... the same fuel, from the same stations, that fed 2 million 7.3L engines for the last 25 years with nary a drop of water causing 4 or 5 figure expenses. Why would anyone want that signature look retrofitted to a truck that didn't come factory fitted with those problems?

Besides, that front end looks cobbled onto the rest of the body, even for the 11-16's where it was original equipment. Something about the body break seam angle suddenly turning into a hood lift line doesn't quite work for me. The erasure of the original cohesive design language is evident in the substitution. At least with the evolution of the '73-79 front clips, each successive iteration actually worked, as did the '80 through '97 evolutions. Not so much with the 99-16 evolvements, imho.
 
  #5  
Old 12-07-2018, 06:01 PM
00t444e's Avatar
00t444e
00t444e is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 3,446
Received 422 Likes on 287 Posts
^^^ I agree ^^^ I want my 7.3 truck to look like a 7.3 truck, not a 6.0, 6.4 or 6.7
 
  #6  
Old 12-07-2018, 08:30 PM
97-psd's Avatar
97-psd
97-psd is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: knoxville, tn
Posts: 3,643
Received 374 Likes on 268 Posts
^^^^^. I concur. I liked my truck when I bought it. I still like it. I have no desire to change it
 
  #7  
Old 12-07-2018, 10:24 PM
7.3 Powerstroke Guy's Avatar
7.3 Powerstroke Guy
7.3 Powerstroke Guy is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 219
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Y2KW57
There are several long running threads on FTE that detail, week by week, bit by bit, blow by blow, various members "conversions" from the 99-03 style to the 11-16 style. These threads I believe are upstairs, in the 1999-2016 Super Duty forum (non diesel specific).

Personally, I think it is like trying to put a 1958 Bel Air front grille, bumper, fenders, hood, and headlights... onto a 1957 Bel Air. Sure, the quad beam '58 headlights may look fancier than the '57 single beam per side, but you just don't cobble a 58 front end onto a 57 body. That's sacrilegious in the realm of automotive art, and offers no real utility, since single beams can still have dual filaments and throw just as much useful light. Why ruin the original design language that defines the vintage?

The 11-16 front clip will forever be associated with cracked radiators, contaminated C4 pumps taking out the entire injection system to the tune of 5 figures, reduced power and forced to the side of the road regens, dropped exhaust valves, electrical gremlins that would keep NASA engineers up at night trying to solve, funky Ford Sync systems, warranty denials due to water in the fuel... the same fuel, from the same stations, that fed 2 million 7.3L engines for the last 25 years with nary a drop of water causing 4 or 5 figure expenses. Why would anyone want that signature look retrofitted to a truck that didn't come factory fitted with those problems?

Besides, that front end looks cobbled onto the rest of the body, even for the 11-16's where it was original equipment. Something about the body break seam angle suddenly turning into a hood lift line doesn't quite work for me. The erasure of the original cohesive design language is evident in the substitution. At least with the evolution of the '73-79 front clips, each successive iteration actually worked, as did the '80 through '97 evolutions. Not so much with the 99-16 evolvements, imho.
I completely agree. And yes, I see it in similar light in that the stigma associated with 11-16s should not disguise the reputation of a tried and true engine and truck.

I purchased my 2002 with a 2014 bed on it and I never liked how the fender body lines didn't completely match. Even though the front end was never swapped to an 11-16 front end, I just was never fond on how the bed looked on this truck.

 
  #8  
Old 12-07-2018, 11:18 PM
00t444e's Avatar
00t444e
00t444e is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Southern OH
Posts: 3,446
Received 422 Likes on 287 Posts
I have a 2012 bed on my 2000 but I have the bottom below the body line and around the wheel wells bedlined so you can't really tell.
 
  #9  
Old 12-08-2018, 07:25 AM
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Tugly is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Columbia River
Posts: 18,797
Received 111 Likes on 66 Posts
I have a newer bumper on my 2000, but it's still a 2000 everywhere else. I like the look... and I don't want to make a FrankenStink.
 
  #10  
Old 12-08-2018, 08:30 AM
SchaefferUSMC's Avatar
SchaefferUSMC
SchaefferUSMC is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Tennessee
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didnt even notice the nissian tag. Wow. And I do agree with yall, if I have a 7.3 SD, Id want it to look like one.
 
  #11  
Old 12-08-2018, 08:40 AM
SRBF150's Avatar
SRBF150
SRBF150 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,159
Received 33 Likes on 21 Posts
I'm in the camp of leaving my 99 mostly 99. I do have a stout front bumper an 04 head light housings, but both of these I consider safety improvements. It's like lipstick on a pig. I just happen to like my pig even if the lefties cut their eyes at me when it's loudly idling and stinking up the street.
 
  #12  
Old 12-08-2018, 08:48 AM
Dan V's Avatar
Dan V
Dan V is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: north of Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 5,230
Received 575 Likes on 372 Posts
Well, the options are few for a replacement bed, and what is out there is of the newer body style (11-16). My plan is to hunt down some narrow fender flares that will help disguise the wheel well body lines. It looks to be a 11-16 set for the rear and a 99-08? for the front.
 
  #13  
Old 12-08-2018, 09:37 AM
bigb56's Avatar
bigb56
bigb56 is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,379
Received 217 Likes on 147 Posts
Originally Posted by SRBF150
I'm in the camp of leaving my 99 mostly 99. I do have a stout front bumper an 04 head light housings, but both of these I consider safety improvements. It's like lipstick on a pig. I just happen to like my pig even if the lefties cut their eyes at me when it's loudly idling and stinking up the street.
I agree, I don't have the desire to make my truck look like something it isn't however I do have 08 tow mirrors which is a big safety improvement IMHO and the 18" Lariat wheels which were actually an option in 2004 and look totally natural on the truck.
 
  #14  
Old 12-08-2018, 05:38 PM
dn29626's Avatar
dn29626
dn29626 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,500
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
My 2001 is 2001, bumper to bumper.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WaxdNuggz
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
11-20-2016 09:37 PM
Cat906
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
21
01-15-2014 10:03 PM
blucollar4xford
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
8
08-18-2006 12:21 AM
equium
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
4
04-14-2004 06:44 PM
Mario
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
03-18-2000 09:39 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Been seeing some 7.3s with newer style bodies



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 PM.