What header for a 1995 351W...not too many choices anymore.
#16
#19
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes
on
763 Posts
Spark plug access isn't an issue with longtubes in general.
I have a side vies of the Flowtechs on my F150 somewhere, the big problem is that the collector ends up pointed right at the trans cross member and not very far away so getting the pipes attached is difficult at best.
Ok here are 2 pics, the first are the original Flowtechs from the '90s when they were a separate company. These fit beautifully in this AOD truck.
The next pic is with Flowtechs after Accel bought them out, this is what you get now. Look at how much further back and lower they are and the bend I had to use to get the pipe up over the crossmember.
I have a side vies of the Flowtechs on my F150 somewhere, the big problem is that the collector ends up pointed right at the trans cross member and not very far away so getting the pipes attached is difficult at best.
Ok here are 2 pics, the first are the original Flowtechs from the '90s when they were a separate company. These fit beautifully in this AOD truck.
The next pic is with Flowtechs after Accel bought them out, this is what you get now. Look at how much further back and lower they are and the bend I had to use to get the pipe up over the crossmember.
#21
I don't believe there is much difference in peak power between long tube and shorty headers. The difference seems to be the long tubes make a bit more torque at low RPM's. No matter which way you go, fit them in the vehicle first, before you send them out for ceramic coating. It is much easier to cut, weld and dimple them before they are coated.
#22
That's what mine are like currently, although the trans makes a huge difference in space for routing. Mine started life around an m5od, and there was more than ample space to bring the drivers side under the trans before the crossmember. When I put a zf5 in, had to cut and lower the crossover a few inches. An e4od is probably worse than the zf5, so those are things to consider for sure. My y pipe is very easy to remove with this configuration, and I would think bringing the drivers side past the crossmember would make it much worse or require some breaks on the system to allow it to be dropped more easily.
#25
Of course, there is a lot we could discuss that also impact power production...things like primary diameter, collector diameter and length. For instance, a header designed for a 408 race car with 2" primaries would not work well in a low rpm application. Something important to note: getting any scavenge out of those bassani headers would be a win....if they offered even 50% of what a comparable long tube design would offer considering shorties offer virtually none.
#26
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes
on
763 Posts
#27
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,926
Likes: 0
Received 964 Likes
on
763 Posts
#28
#29
One of my big concerns is cost. I am estimating about an extra $1000 to go with long tube headers...Headers about $300, Bung weld about $100, Jet-hot coating about $300, then having someone make a custom Y-pipe...I'm guessing another $300 (I can't weld/fab any pipes myself.) I'm not sure the cost is going to be worth it over a stock manifold.
One more question I have, hopefully someone will have some guidance: Since I am using a Catalytic converter, then muffler...will the long tube header still provide any benefit, or will the restriction from the Cat eliminate any gains from the long tube header?
#30