1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

6.0l transmission cooler and Derale Thermostat REDO of the REDO DONE! ;)

  #16  
Old 08-15-2018, 11:44 PM
Colorado350's Avatar
Colorado350
Colorado350 is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,807
Received 119 Likes on 84 Posts
Ok, so this whole temperature rating issue has been well a kick in the nuts. I wonder what the temperature rating of the average transmission hose we typically grab when doing the 6.0 cooler? I highly doubt it’s rated at 350* because finding a tranny hose with that kind of rating seems to be a specialty item. I tried to find the temperature rating of the NAPA H1706 I just removed to redo this project …nobody has that information. I’ve run that hose for 25K since doing this project the first time and that was before the transmission rebuild…so stock transmission and torque converter. Are the temperatures suggested above ONLY for a stock transmission and torque converter? My transmission was rebuilt with a triple disc torque converter and Tugger hd2 shift kit am I still going to see the temperatures suggested above? I’m NOT suggesting that Y2K or Mark are providing bad information or anything of the sort! I’m asking to learn and hopefully help anyone else that may have used subpar hoses.





Here’s some specifics on these hoses and fittings. It looks like the fittings CAN be reused if you’re very careful.
 
  #17  
Old 08-16-2018, 12:32 AM
timmyboy76's Avatar
timmyboy76
timmyboy76 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,793
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Been using push loks for years. Started with the veggie system in 2012. Anyway, i would slice the ends, peel it back and remove hose..install new piece since old hose would be hard/dry/cracking. As for installing new hose, id hit the nipple of the pushlok with a tab of grease then push hose on over..bingo bango...
*****as for temps from 6.0 xooler, were only installing a foot or 2 from the exit side of raditor. ...but..its apples to carrots though, as for temps comparison, my coolants sensor is plumbed into the block. Operating temp, shes at 230*ish, towingbup hill will peak 250*ish. Reading at WP, 200*ish
 
  #18  
Old 08-16-2018, 08:13 AM
Y2KW57's Avatar
Y2KW57
Y2KW57 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,664
Received 3,320 Likes on 1,741 Posts
Originally Posted by Colorado350
Ok, so this whole temperature rating issue has been well a kick in the nuts.
I don't think anyone is trying to bust your b a l l s. Your write up style is awesome. Your topic title and concept is brilliantly appropriate for the audience of readers here: that being a "REDO", because by this age all of us have made modifications and repairs that we have thought about redoing. In another recent thread, more than one person quoted the adage: You can do it right. Or you can do it again.

The irony inherent in your thread is that by sharing your redo on FTE, the collective experience and peer review here may inspire you to redo your redo, but that is exactly your point. Better to redo your redo in the comfort of your own driveway surrounded by all of your own tools... rather than on the side of the road in another state subject to whatever parts, tools, or overpriced help you can scrounge in a pinch.

Originally Posted by Colorado350
I wonder what the temperature rating of the average transmission hose we typically grab when doing the 6.0 cooler?
The average person doing the 6.0 cooler does not "remove 90% of the metal transmission lines". In fact, most folks report not even touching the factory transmission line that outputs the hottest fluid from the torque converter to the oil to water (OTW) cooler in the bottom of the radiator. All the 2001-2003 Super Duties had this OTW cooler installed at the factory. Most 2000 Super Duties made after March of 2000 also had this OTW cooler. And many of the 99-early 2000 Super Duty owners had the TSB performed which was issued at the time to retrofit a radiator with the OTW cooler, along with new transmission cooling lines that plumbed this cooler first in line.

Once the transmission fluid passes through the OTW cooler, the high temperatures we are worried about from the torque converter have been substantially knocked down. Water is a more efficient heat transfer medium than air, so the efficacy of an OTW transmission cooler to ameliorate the peak temps imposed by the tortuous turns inside a torque converter should not be under estimated. That was Ford's mistake back in 1996 or 97, whenever the decision was made to eliminate the OTW transmission cooler for the then upcoming Super Duty. It didn't take long for the consequences of that mistake to reveal themselves once these trucks were in the hands of consumers.

Something else to consider: If 200F degree radiator water can actually COOL transmission fluid, that speaks volumes for how hot transmission fluid can get.

Anyone with an early 99 through early 2000 who still doesn't have an OTW cooler might want to consider one. But for the majority of folks who do already have one, by the time the fluid leaves the OTW cooler and is headed toward the original oil to air (OTA) cooler, or the 6.0L style replacement OTA cooler, that fluid is already substantially cooler than the 300 degrees it may have once been prior to being cooled by the OTW cooler. So essentially, the typical 6.0L cooler installation isn't the issue with these hoses. The concern here in this case revolves around your report that you removed "90%" of your metal lines. That sounds like you removed a substantial part of the line between your transmission and your first cooler, the OTW one. And that is where you might want to consider a "redo".

Originally Posted by Colorado350
I highly doubt it’s rated at 350* because finding a tranny hose with that kind of rating seems to be a specialty item.
Ford has transmission lines available as service parts, and it is highly probable that Ford's lines are rated to reliably withstand the temperature extremes Ford found in testing. Mark did done some of that testing, towing trailers with Super Duties. You read what he reported.

Originally Posted by Colorado350
Are the temperatures suggested above ONLY for a stock transmission and torque converter? My transmission was rebuilt with a triple disc torque converter and Tugger hd2 shift kit am I still going to see the temperatures suggested above?
Your upgraded torque converter suggests that your torque converter should last longer before failure. Does it also mean that the fluid temperature rise will be any less as the fluid performs the "work" of fluid drive? Or does it mean that the equipment will not fail and fatigue as quickly from the heat. If the latter, then despite having a better built, longer lasting transmission that is less vulnerable to the discs getting burnt and the cover ballooning from heat, the fluid is still getting worked, and therefore is still getting hot. The only way to know exactly how hot is to plumb a sending unit on the output line of the transmission, before the first cooler. Since you already have Parker PushLOK lines installed, it is much easier for you to cut and splice in a sending unit block so that you can see how high your TC output temps get for your particular transmission and loads.

Originally Posted by Colorado350
I’m NOT suggesting that Y2K or Mark are providing bad information or anything of the sort! I’m asking to learn and hopefully help anyone else that may have used subpar hoses.
I initially typed reaching up to "300F+" in my earlier post, but then worried you might discount it as my seeing "windmills" on a hill somewhere, so I changed the number to something just under 300, to convey the concern without coming across as over the top. I also considered that average daily driving duties doesn't push the TFT to those extremes. But the road to reliability requires considering the possible extremes, and that was exactly what Mark did professionally. And with your own stated report of towing a 9K trailer up an 8% grade in 90F+ ambients demonstrates that you might find yourself in extreme territory on the occasion where you might have to back that trailer up a hill, when there is no cooling airflow to your big 6.0L cooler since you are going in reverse, and the temperatures are stacking by the minute.

The thermal load on your Parker lines might also stack from outside the line, as the line passes in near proximity to the turbo down pipe, which could present another potential reason to consider metal lines until you get to the front cover of the engine.

Another potential concern on your line routing, unrelated to temperature, is the location of your external filter for the transmission fluid. The filter appears to be cable tied outboard of your passenger frame rail. This puts the filter directly in line with the front passenger tire. In the event that tire throws a tread, the tread flap can whack the filter, separating it from the lines, and within the couple of minutes it might take to safely change lanes on a four lane freeway with the tire tread flailing around inside your wheel well until you can get stopped on the side of the road, you may have lost 2 gallons of transmission fluid, at a flow rate of one gallon per minute. Now a flat tire problem has compounded into a transmission problem.

I have had a tire failure that wrecked brake lines, the fender liner, the running board, the front air dam, and the sheetmetal fender itself. I was in lane # 2, and bang, blow out, thunk, thunk, thunk, thunk as the tire flap flipped around, wrecking havoc on every rotation. One cannot stop in the middle of the freeway, so I had to keep allowing the tire tread to flap around and do more damage until people whizzing by would let me change lanes to get to the side of the road. It is not fun to hear those thunks, knowing that with each hit, more damage is being done.

Ford mounts the external transmission filter for the 05-07 models in the same general area as you chose, but Ford positions the filter inboard the frame rail. I have the same filter as you have, and I mounted that filter inboard of the frame rail in the same area that Ford did, and protected it further with an anti bash plate. Something else to consider, should you decide to redo your redo.

 
  #19  
Old 08-16-2018, 10:40 AM
Colorado350's Avatar
Colorado350
Colorado350 is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,807
Received 119 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by Y2KW57
I don't think anyone is trying to bust your b a l l s. Your write up style is awesome. Your topic title and concept is brilliantly appropriate for the audience of readers here: that being a "REDO", because by this age all of us have made modifications and repairs that we have thought about redoing. In another recent thread, more than one person quoted the adage: You can do it right. Or you can do it again.

The irony inherent in your thread is that by sharing your redo on FTE, the collective experience and peer review here may inspire you to redo your redo, but that is exactly your point. Better to redo your redo in the comfort of your own driveway surrounded by all of your own tools... rather than on the side of the road in another state subject to whatever parts, tools, or overpriced help you can scrounge in a pinch.



The average person doing the 6.0 cooler does not "remove 90% of the metal transmission lines". In fact, most folks report not even touching the factory transmission line that outputs the hottest fluid from the torque converter to the oil to water (OTW) cooler in the bottom of the radiator. All the 2001-2003 Super Duties had this OTW cooler installed at the factory. Most 2000 Super Duties made after March of 2000 also had this OTW cooler. And many of the 99-early 2000 Super Duty owners had the TSB performed which was issued at the time to retrofit a radiator with the OTW cooler, along with new transmission cooling lines that plumbed this cooler first in line.

Once the transmission fluid passes through the OTW cooler, the high temperatures we are worried about from the torque converter have been substantially knocked down. Water is a more efficient heat transfer medium than air, so the efficacy of an OTW transmission cooler to ameliorate the peak temps imposed by the tortuous turns inside a torque converter should not be under estimated. That was Ford's mistake back in 1996 or 97, whenever the decision was made to eliminate the OTW transmission cooler for the then upcoming Super Duty. It didn't take long for the consequences of that mistake to reveal themselves once these trucks were in the hands of consumers.

Something else to consider: If 200F degree radiator water can actually COOL transmission fluid, that speaks volumes for how hot transmission fluid can get.

Anyone with an early 99 through early 2000 who still doesn't have an OTW cooler might want to consider one. But for the majority of folks who do already have one, by the time the fluid leaves the OTW cooler and is headed toward the original oil to air (OTA) cooler, or the 6.0L style replacement OTA cooler, that fluid is already substantially cooler than the 300 degrees it may have once been prior to being cooled by the OTW cooler. So essentially, the typical 6.0L cooler installation isn't the issue with these hoses. The concern here in this case revolves around your report that you removed "90%" of your metal lines. That sounds like you removed a substantial part of the line between your transmission and your first cooler, the OTW one. And that is where you might want to consider a "redo".



Ford has transmission lines available as service parts, and it is highly probable that Ford's lines are rated to reliably withstand the temperature extremes Ford found in testing. Mark did done some of that testing, towing trailers with Super Duties. You read what he reported.



Your upgraded torque converter suggests that your torque converter should last longer before failure. Does it also mean that the fluid temperature rise will be any less as the fluid performs the "work" of fluid drive? Or does it mean that the equipment will not fail and fatigue as quickly from the heat. If the latter, then despite having a better built, longer lasting transmission that is less vulnerable to the discs getting burnt and the cover ballooning from heat, the fluid is still getting worked, and therefore is still getting hot. The only way to know exactly how hot is to plumb a sending unit on the output line of the transmission, before the first cooler. Since you already have Parker PushLOK lines installed, it is much easier for you to cut and splice in a sending unit block so that you can see how high your TC output temps get for your particular transmission and loads.



I initially typed reaching up to "300F+" in my earlier post, but then worried you might discount it as my seeing "windmills" on a hill somewhere, so I changed the number to something just under 300, to convey the concern without coming across as over the top. I also considered that average daily driving duties doesn't push the TFT to those extremes. But the road to reliability requires considering the possible extremes, and that was exactly what Mark did professionally. And with your own stated report of towing a 9K trailer up an 8% grade in 90F+ ambients demonstrates that you might find yourself in extreme territory on the occasion where you might have to back that trailer up a hill, when there is no cooling airflow to your big 6.0L cooler since you are going in reverse, and the temperatures are stacking by the minute.

The thermal load on your Parker lines might also stack from outside the line, as the line passes in near proximity to the turbo down pipe, which could present another potential reason to consider metal lines until you get to the front cover of the engine.

Another potential concern on your line routing, unrelated to temperature, is the location of your external filter for the transmission fluid. The filter appears to be cable tied outboard of your passenger frame rail. This puts the filter directly in line with the front passenger tire. In the event that tire throws a tread, the tread flap can whack the filter, separating it from the lines, and within the couple of minutes it might take to safely change lanes on a four lane freeway with the tire tread flailing around inside your wheel well until you can get stopped on the side of the road, you may have lost 2 gallons of transmission fluid, at a flow rate of one gallon per minute. Now a flat tire problem has compounded into a transmission problem.

I have had a tire failure that wrecked brake lines, the fender liner, the running board, the front air dam, and the sheetmetal fender itself. I was in lane # 2, and bang, blow out, thunk, thunk, thunk, thunk as the tire flap flipped around, wrecking havoc on every rotation. One cannot stop in the middle of the freeway, so I had to keep allowing the tire tread to flap around and do more damage until people whizzing by would let me change lanes to get to the side of the road. It is not fun to hear those thunks, knowing that with each hit, more damage is being done.

Ford mounts the external transmission filter for the 05-07 models in the same general area as you chose, but Ford positions the filter inboard the frame rail. I have the same filter as you have, and I mounted that filter inboard of the frame rail in the same area that Ford did, and protected it further with an anti bash plate. Something else to consider, should you decide to redo your redo.

I didn't take any of what you or Mark said as ball busting. If anyone is busting my *****, it's myself. I should've asked more questions, I should've done more research, in the end the buck stops with me for my decisions. I made the assumption that a place that deals with hydraulic hoses and fluid control would be providing reliable information. I will be going back this morning and looking for the 836 hose that you recommended in your earlier post. That looks like the heaviest duty hose they have with the push lock system. Otherwise I will see what else they have and have them make me some hoses. Decisions have consequences, I made a bad one and I'm dealing with said consequences. I appreciate you taking your time and energy to point out potential issues that could have affected me on the road when it's much harder to deal with it than in the driveway. Hopefully this thread will help other FTE members before they make the same mistake I did.
 
  #20  
Old 08-16-2018, 01:24 PM
timmyboy76's Avatar
timmyboy76
timmyboy76 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,793
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
The bashplate alone, opened my eyes to go make one as i speak. I got the SpringerPop idea, where the spin on is tucked into the back opening of passenger side bumper. Exposing 180* of it to the pass tire to wreck havoc on..thanks!
 
  #21  
Old 08-16-2018, 02:01 PM
F250_'s Avatar
F250_
F250_ is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Looking towards Greenvill
Posts: 11,223
Received 199 Likes on 107 Posts
Originally Posted by Colorado350
...
Here’s some specifics on these hoses and fittings. It looks like the fittings CAN be reused if you’re very careful.



Yes, they CAN be re-used, but that little qualifier of "if you're very careful" can be a real stinker. I've had to replace a fitting because I nicked the barb when changing the hose. It's not easy to use a sharp blade to cut through the casing and hose without nicking the edge of a barb. It CAN be done, but it's not easy. The solder gun or wood burner tip technique removes the larger part of that potential complication.

Given Timmy's experience, perhaps I just am not practiced enough (nor do I want to be practiced enough) to get good at it. There are some things I just don't want to ever be good at.
 
  #22  
Old 08-16-2018, 02:29 PM
timmyboy76's Avatar
timmyboy76
timmyboy76 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,793
Received 48 Likes on 36 Posts
Trust me Pete, i didnt want to have the knotch under my belt as well. It got to the point, every 6mon i was replacing the hoses. Even with 300psi or r39..etc srill saw heat soak from engine. Maybe i just got lucky... I learned my lesson this time around(d2 delivery) and had braided lines made with AN fittings
 
  #23  
Old 08-16-2018, 02:52 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Mark Kovalsky is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 23,239
Received 1,571 Likes on 1,049 Posts
Originally Posted by Colorado350
My transmission was rebuilt with a triple disc torque converter and Tugger hd2 shift kit am I still going to see the temperatures suggested above?
Yes, you will. Neither a triple disc torque converter nor a shift kit will lower these temperatures. The high temperatures are created when the torque converter is unlocked. All three discs are just along for the ride then, and the shift kit isn't doing anything because the trans isn't shifting.
 
  #24  
Old 08-18-2018, 06:14 PM
Colorado350's Avatar
Colorado350
Colorado350 is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,807
Received 119 Likes on 84 Posts
So this has turned into a PITA! FIRST- I got hoses that didn’t have a high enough temperature rating for the application. So I got replacement hoses yesterday and started the project this morning. Severe weather is forecasted so I got busy
swapping hoses a fittings. I even removed the Presslok fittings on the left side to ensure they were sealed. It only took a couple minutes and as my GF tells me, a couple minutes is not a long time. I gotta keep a sense of humor!





Got the new hoses and fittings installed in the thermostat.


New hoses are rated for 302* (Blue hose). You can physically feel the differences in the new hoses.

 
  #25  
Old 08-18-2018, 06:26 PM
Colorado350's Avatar
Colorado350
Colorado350 is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,807
Received 119 Likes on 84 Posts

So I got everything reinstalled and started the truck to check for leaks. Damn, I cracked the thermostat reinstalling the fittings and had to start it over! .
Well, because of the weather and forecast of large hail, I NEED to be able to move the truck. I ran to Lowe’s and picked up 2 black pipe connectors to connect the hoses where the thermostat had been installed. I have not decided if I will re-install a new thermostat or leave this. Lowes did not have a brass coupler so I stuck with the black pipe connectors.







Sure enough, a small crack.






 
  #26  
Old 08-18-2018, 06:32 PM
Colorado350's Avatar
Colorado350
Colorado350 is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,807
Received 119 Likes on 84 Posts
This is how I connected the 2 different size hoses 1/2” to 3/8”… remember I used 1/2” male NPT fittings to go into the thermostat, which made connecting the hoses easy … cough cough so to speak. I started the truck and no leaks!
So at least now I can move the truck if I need to pull it in if we do get severe weather.

 
  #27  
Old 08-18-2018, 06:34 PM
Colorado350's Avatar
Colorado350
Colorado350 is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,807
Received 119 Likes on 84 Posts
I decided to move the filter to the to the front bumper instead of passenger wheel well. I left enough hose that the filter will drop down for easy change out.



 
  #28  
Old 08-18-2018, 06:40 PM
Colorado350's Avatar
Colorado350
Colorado350 is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 4,807
Received 119 Likes on 84 Posts
Ok, a couple questions… If I decide to not replace thermostat can I leave the black pipe connectors in place or should I order Brass couplers? Do I need the thermostat?

Unfortunately, Lowe’s did not have Brass today or I would have used it. Thanks to everyone that provided information to make sure this was done right. And thank you for the Reps.
 
  #29  
Old 08-18-2018, 10:23 PM
Mark Kovalsky's Avatar
Mark Kovalsky
Mark Kovalsky is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 23,239
Received 1,571 Likes on 1,049 Posts
The black pipe will be fine.
 
  #30  
Old 08-21-2018, 10:10 AM
F250_'s Avatar
F250_
F250_ is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Looking towards Greenvill
Posts: 11,223
Received 199 Likes on 107 Posts
Not a major issue at all, but the thread sealant is "Gasoila", not "Gasolina". I only mention it so folks will not search for the wrong thread sealant (there is no "gasolina" thread sealant).
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 6.0l transmission cooler and Derale Thermostat REDO of the REDO DONE! ;)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.