5.0L Coyote Swap in '79 F100/F150
#1
5.0L Coyote Swap in '79 F100/F150
Have any of you swapped a modern (thinking 2011 or later) 5.0L Coyote in a sixth generation F100 or F150? I am trying to decide if I want to go the built carbureted 351W route or swap in a used Coyote and probably get better MPG and HP numbers (running 87 octane), saving money in the long run, in terms of gas . I was researching this, and from what I gather I will need some control pack for the electronic part and also, at least for classic mustangs, there is issues with fitting the engine in the bay requiring a modification of the front suspension. I would want to mate it with a TKO 6 speed manual. I haven't seen many in depth tutorials like this though.
Have any of y'all done a swap like this? What are the major steps and what would be a ballpark overall cost of doing a swap like this?
Have any of y'all done a swap like this? What are the major steps and what would be a ballpark overall cost of doing a swap like this?
#2
#3
Would a coyote swap be the wiser choice in terms of saving money in the long run? Looks like the Control package is a good $1500 and the engine and transmission will probably run me another $8000 or so plus all the work to make it fit in an older truck (not sure if this applies, most of the guides I have seen are for narrow '65 mustangs).
I am not really familiar with modern ford engines but I am looking for an engine that has plenty of bottom torque starting as low in RPM as possible and peaking at ~350 LB/Ft with at least 350HP peak HP. Was hoping to get at least 15 - 20 MPG. Are there modern EFI ford engines that could meet these goals without the cost that comes with the Coyotes? Might be crazy, but I was hoping to get my engine and transmission how I need it for under $5000.
I am not really familiar with modern ford engines but I am looking for an engine that has plenty of bottom torque starting as low in RPM as possible and peaking at ~350 LB/Ft with at least 350HP peak HP. Was hoping to get at least 15 - 20 MPG. Are there modern EFI ford engines that could meet these goals without the cost that comes with the Coyotes? Might be crazy, but I was hoping to get my engine and transmission how I need it for under $5000.
#4
Fuel consumption on Dents reflects aerodynamics and drivetrain as much as engine. Swapping in a newer engine will not change aerodynamics. A low friction transmission with 4+ gears including overdrive may help some.
Reasons for swapping might include drivability, range (11-12 MPG is a whole lot better than 9-10!) and doing what you like to your dent. I do not think the economics will drive it. It is hard to pay back a major investment with moderate fuel savings. Maybe a 12V Cummins diesel swap would do it if you can source the parts at low cost and do a lot of work yourself.
I enjoy my Dent as an extra vehicle. It works hard when needed. It backs up DD's when they are down. It provides wheels for visitors. I also do not put a lot of miles on it and don't worry much about fuel consumption. Some day I plan to add EFI as I have on another classic. It may help fuel consumption and range a little. With other changes it can help performance. It should help starting and drivability and altitude adaptability. That said, I do not expect payback in mileage alone. .
Reasons for swapping might include drivability, range (11-12 MPG is a whole lot better than 9-10!) and doing what you like to your dent. I do not think the economics will drive it. It is hard to pay back a major investment with moderate fuel savings. Maybe a 12V Cummins diesel swap would do it if you can source the parts at low cost and do a lot of work yourself.
I enjoy my Dent as an extra vehicle. It works hard when needed. It backs up DD's when they are down. It provides wheels for visitors. I also do not put a lot of miles on it and don't worry much about fuel consumption. Some day I plan to add EFI as I have on another classic. It may help fuel consumption and range a little. With other changes it can help performance. It should help starting and drivability and altitude adaptability. That said, I do not expect payback in mileage alone. .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ss27gogeta
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
05-12-2014 07:37 AM
ford racer 02
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
12-21-2001 10:25 AM