2017+ Super Duty The 2017+ Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab

2016 6.7 vs 2017 6.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 03-23-2018, 08:20 AM
smokewagun's Avatar
smokewagun
smokewagun is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 2,101
Received 57 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Strokin-A-2010
If you owned a company would you want a employee that does work "just fine" or a employee that does the job the best?
Totally ignorant statement to compare truck mills. Owning a business is about the bottom line. Today particularly, we see companies paying cheap wages for inexperienced help to make ends meet because its cost effective or profitable. I don't need a truck that does it best when one that does it just fine cuts the mustard on my budget and profitability. If your statement were true, I guess those driving light duty diesel trucks should switch out to medium or heavy duties because they certainly outhaul the 6.7L. There are plenty of gas trucks out there that have pulled their weight just fine for 100's of 1,000's of miles, and still run. After logging close to 3 million miles in diesels, and seeing the loss of dependability to claim the rights to the highest hp and tq, I'm not so sure I'd rather run one diesel 400,000 miles, or two gassers 200,000 each. I'm not seeing much more return on high mileage diesels over their comparable gas counterpart, and then you need to consider the repairs and slight increase in maintenance on the smoker.
 
  #47  
Old 03-23-2018, 08:27 AM
Strokin-A-2010's Avatar
Strokin-A-2010
Strokin-A-2010 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by smokewagun

Totally ignorant statement to compare truck mills. Owning a business is about the bottom line. Today particularly, we see companies paying cheap wages for inexperienced help to make ends meet because its cost effective or profitable. I don't need a truck that does it best when one that does it just fine cuts the mustard on my budget and profitability. If your statement were true, I guess those driving light duty diesel trucks should switch out to medium or heavy duties because they certainly outhaul the 6.7L. There are plenty of gas trucks out there that have pulled their weight just fine for 100's of 1,000's of miles, and still run. After logging close to 3 million miles in diesels, and seeing the loss of dependability to claim the rights to the highest hp and tq, I'm not so sure I'd rather run one diesel 400,000 miles, or two gassers 200,000 each. I'm not seeing much more return on high mileage diesels over their comparable gas counterpart, and then you need to consider the repairs and slight increase in maintenance on the smoker.
You do realize that the medium duty trucks have the 6.7L as well.
 
  #48  
Old 03-23-2018, 08:40 AM
Samsonsworld's Avatar
Samsonsworld
Samsonsworld is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Strokin-A-2010


When towing compared to the 6.7 yes it’s a dog. I had a 2015 f250 6.2L so I can vouch for it. It’s ok when empty. And why the hell would I be butthurt. I don’t own a gasser anymore. Lol
Except is was revamped in 2017. Yes, the 6.7l tows better but I've driven enough vehicles to know the 6.2l is no slouch. It's cheaper and it'll haul 5 people and a heck of a lot of gear comfortably....which is probably why they are so popular in the oilfield. Both trucks have their place.

Personally, I haven't gained my trust back for diesels, so I'll stick with the dog for now.
 
  #49  
Old 03-23-2018, 08:46 AM
rfbrain's Avatar
rfbrain
rfbrain is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Strokin-A-2010
Well if you take care of your employee they will take care of you. It's pretty simple.
Been plenty of well taking care of employees that turned out to be total ripoffs...
 
  #50  
Old 03-23-2018, 08:59 AM
Buliwyf's Avatar
Buliwyf
Buliwyf is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
It's not really fair to call a 6.2L a dog. It eats 6.8's, 460's, and 5.4's pretty well around here.

The 6.7 is a bit mental power wise. Do you ever wonder what kind of economy, such an engine, with just measly 7.3L power levels, could do?
 
  #51  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:07 AM
DevilDog556's Avatar
DevilDog556
DevilDog556 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Strokin-A-2010
No butthurt here, just pointing out facts. And I love people who justify a gasser being a dog that says "does the job just fine". If you owned a company would you want a employee that does work "just fine" or a employee that does the job the best?
I wasn't specificaly calling you out, just having fun with this loaded topic. Hehe
 
  #52  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:07 AM
DevilDog556's Avatar
DevilDog556
DevilDog556 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Strokin-A-2010


You do realize that the medium duty trucks have the 6.7L as well.
They also have 6.8's .
 
  #53  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:10 AM
DevilDog556's Avatar
DevilDog556
DevilDog556 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Samsonsworld
Except is was revamped in 2017. Yes, the 6.7l tows better but I've driven enough vehicles to know the 6.2l is no slouch. It's cheaper and it'll haul 5 people and a heck of a lot of gear comfortably....which is probably why they are so popular in the oilfield. Both trucks have their place.

Personally, I haven't gained my trust back for diesels, so I'll stick with the dog for now.
Are gas trucks taking over with the service companies? When I was in Coil Tubing, we had all Diesels since they upcharged all the fuel hehe.
 
  #54  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:21 AM
Samsonsworld's Avatar
Samsonsworld
Samsonsworld is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I wouldn't say gas trucks are taking over. A few things are obvious. The majority of work trucks in my area are Ford and most work trucks have a diesel engine but GM and gas engines are very well represented, too.


edit: should have specified 3/4 and 1 ton trucks
 
  #55  
Old 03-23-2018, 11:55 AM
Buliwyf's Avatar
Buliwyf
Buliwyf is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I would. Down time is a killer. More diesels go down for no reason, than overloaded gassers blowing up or wearing out from hard use. All our trucks are gas except heavy DRW F450's and such. The new big block global engine might get us some gas engines in the bigger trucks as well.

Field service trucks. If we did zero service, and say, delivered RV's or cars, the diesels would be a better choice obviously.
 
  #56  
Old 03-23-2018, 01:19 PM
troverman's Avatar
troverman
troverman is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NH
Posts: 10,812
Received 534 Likes on 258 Posts
The 6.7L has more lag than an EcoBoost, and a 6.2L has no turbo lag. But a couple of things:
-All 6.7's are torque-limited in 1st gear (dually) and up through 3rd gear (SRW)
-6.2L trucks from the 2011-2016 generation would not supply full power until 3,000RPM was reached. Companies like 5-star tuning could remove that limitation. Maybe 2017 trucks are not limited this way.
-I've had 6.2L's and 6.7L's. The diesel "feels" faster to me but in reality a gas engine keeps up or beats it to 60 mph. Motor Trend testing backs this up.
-The diesel really shines when a heavy load is placed upon it. The gas engine quickly drops gears and starts winding up to try to reach peak power and torque. The diesel engine drops maybe one gear, maybe none. You just see the turbo boost gauge swing, and the truck loses no speed and engine tone does not change.

The first-gen 6.7L (2011-2014) felt the perkiest to me...despite having the lowest power ratings. I think it was the unique turbo used in those years had less lag. 2015 got a bigger, more traditional turbo...tad more lag.

The G transmission is perkier. It has a smaller torque converter and less fluid to pump around. The physical unit is smaller and lighter. It is completely suitable for what a gas F-250 is capable of.

So, street drag race between a 6.7L and 6.2L would be close. Add even a small trailer behind both truck, however...and the 6.2L will just fade.
 
  #57  
Old 03-23-2018, 05:00 PM
6.2caribou's Avatar
6.2caribou
6.2caribou is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Southwestern Pa.
Posts: 920
Received 164 Likes on 105 Posts
I have a buddy that runs a gas well maintenance company. Quite a few years ago, before the diesels were choked down with all the emissions crap, his group changed from diesel to gas because the additional weight of the diesel played havoc with the front ends in their off-road environment. It was continual ball joint, track bar, etc repairs causing tons of downtime.
 
  #58  
Old 03-23-2018, 05:19 PM
Buliwyf's Avatar
Buliwyf
Buliwyf is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Oddly my fellow techs will drive a truck with completely wasted joints and shocks and say "it's just fine". Maybe that's why they're field techs and not auto techs. We do notice that the diesels stink in slick mud. Unless both trucks that we're comparing are massively heavy, then it matters less, they both suck.

But yeah, off road, SRW, gas truck all the way.

For example our fleet shocks stay on for the life of the vehicle. 150,000m for Express blobs, 200,000m for trucks. And everyone here knows those shocks are toast at 50,000m. I buy my own, spray paint them OEM black and sneak them on. I don't want to be a paraplegic because we don't service our shocks.
 
  #59  
Old 03-23-2018, 08:47 PM
ryan weeks's Avatar
ryan weeks
ryan weeks is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Traded 6.2 for a 6.7... best thing ever!! It’s all about purpose thought, I could get by with a gasser for towing a toy hauler, it worked... but that’s where it ends. 6.7 makes the towing portion enjoyable, also went from 250 to 350 DRW so there’s that... point is, it depends on the purpose.
 
  #60  
Old 03-24-2018, 06:19 AM
stufarmer's Avatar
stufarmer
stufarmer is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Tampa
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I had a 17' F250 4x4, 6.2 & 4:30's. And now a 17' F350 4x4 6.7 & 3:55's. I traded the 250 because we changed or plans in RV's. And, I really wanted a Platinum in the first place. In daily driving, the 6.2 wins hands down. It just goes. No pause. The 6.7 pauses before it goes. The pause makes driving the truck in city and rural driving feel lethargic. This is not my first 6.7, and not my first 6.2. They all perform the same.
 


Quick Reply: 2016 6.7 vs 2017 6.2



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 AM.