I have a 79 U-Haul with a 330 HD in it tough engine runs great but it's a slug , does

  #1  
Old 03-02-2018, 10:29 PM
David Bradshaw's Avatar
David Bradshaw
David Bradshaw is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a 79 U-Haul with a 330 HD in it tough engine runs great but it's a slug , does

I have a 79 U-Haul with a flatbed on it it's got a 330 HD in it heck of a motor you can't beat it it runs good and smooth but it's a gas hog and it's a slug no power does anyone out there know of a way that I can beef this engine up and give it some power just by working on the top end maybe changing the heads a cam a bigger carburetor intake I know you can take an fa engine and just about do anything with them you can make them scream they made 19 different Motors out of the 352 blog so I'm just curious and I want to know what the difference is between Fe and ft, so if any of you big Ford man out there could please give me some info in a few tips I would really be appreciated and my transmission also has a big drum brake on the tail shaft of it I love that thing I can park it on a side of a hill with a load of logs on it without scotching it it's just handy to have.
 
  #2  
Old 03-03-2018, 05:06 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
The 330 is very low compression to start with - that's going to limit what it will do no matter what. You COULD put FE heads and intake on it, but I doubt you will get much out of it.

A 391 would probably be best.
 
  #3  
Old 03-03-2018, 06:15 AM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 646 Likes on 541 Posts
Originally Posted by David Bradshaw
I have a 79 U-Haul with a flatbed on it, its got a 330 HD
If it has a 330 FT engine, it cannot be a 1979, as FT's were cancelled at the end of the 1978 model run. 370/429 engines replaced the FT's beginning in 1979.

To verify the year, post the last 6 digits of the VIN
 
  #4  
Old 03-05-2018, 07:50 PM
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Destroked 450 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Harned, Ky
Posts: 2,147
Received 130 Likes on 105 Posts
If it's a 330 HD the heads,intake and exhaust manifolds are different from a FE
If it's a 330 MD they'll inner change with FE parts.

370 2v was a bigger slug than a 330.
 
  #5  
Old 03-06-2018, 04:23 PM
wsu0702's Avatar
wsu0702
wsu0702 is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 140
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
If it has a 330 FT engine, it cannot be a 1979, as FT's were cancelled at the end of the 1978 model run. 370/429 engines replaced the FT's beginning in 1979.

To verify the year, post the last 6 digits of the VIN
Ford installed 330 FT engines into F350 chassis for a large U-Haul fleet order in the 1979 model year. It was the last of the FT engines produced and was designated the 330XD since it was basically a 330HD designed to fit into a light duty truck chassis. Pics below are of a network54 FE forum member's F350 330XD U-Haul truck built in the spring of 1979.
 
  #6  
Old 03-06-2018, 05:31 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
Originally Posted by wsu0702
Ford installed 330 FT engines into F350 chassis for a large U-Haul fleet order in the 1979 model year. It was the last of the FT engines produced and was designated the 330XD since it was basically a 330HD designed to fit into a light duty truck chassis. Pics below are of a network54 FE forum member's F350 330XD U-Haul truck built in the spring of 1979.
And, I have documentation that proves/supports that. I forgot from who, but it might have been you

I really need to get my scanner out of the closet
 
  #7  
Old 03-07-2018, 08:10 AM
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Destroked 450 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Harned, Ky
Posts: 2,147
Received 130 Likes on 105 Posts
That's interesting, I knew Ford had switched to the 370 in the late 70's but didn't know they had ever put a 330 in a F-350.
It would be interesting to know if they designed a special exhaust manifold to fit the HD heads or if they used MD heads that will work with the standard pickup manifolds.
Everything else would have been pretty much a bolt on deal.
 
  #8  
Old 03-07-2018, 08:38 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Destroked 450
That's interesting, I knew Ford had switched to the 370 in the late 70's but didn't know they had ever put a 330 in a F-350.
It would be interesting to know if they designed a special exhaust manifold to fit the HD heads or if they used MD heads that will work with the standard pickup manifolds.
Everything else would have been pretty much a bolt on deal.
Just a glance at the manifold will answer your question. The FT manifolds had an exhaust crossover passage in the center of the head with it's own port, whereas the FE's crossover was internal terminating inside the middle ports.
 
  #9  
Old 03-07-2018, 08:39 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Krewat
The 330 is very low compression to start with - that's going to limit what it will do no matter what. You COULD put FE heads and intake on it, but I doubt you will get much out of it.

A 391 would probably be best.
X 2 on this. The 330 was never intended to be more than a minimal performer to start with. Doubly so in a U-haul truck.
 
  #10  
Old 03-07-2018, 10:43 AM
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Destroked 450 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Harned, Ky
Posts: 2,147
Received 130 Likes on 105 Posts
Originally Posted by baddad457
Just a glance at the manifold will answer your question. The FT manifolds had an exhaust crossover passage in the center of the head with it's own port, whereas the FE's crossover was internal terminating inside the middle ports.
Yea I know the differences but I've never seen on of those 330 powered U-Haul F-350's to see what head and manifold they used.
 
  #11  
Old 03-07-2018, 11:11 AM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
Over the next few days, I'll try and find the documentation I was given. It had part numbers for a lot of things.

BTW, I'm not entire sure the 330 in these things was "heavy duty" - the XD moniker was just a "we're not sure what to call it" - like Destroked said, I'm thinking it was an FE style head.
 
  #12  
Old 03-07-2018, 11:50 AM
Destroked 450's Avatar
Destroked 450
Destroked 450 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Harned, Ky
Posts: 2,147
Received 130 Likes on 105 Posts
That would be good to know
Looking at the pic it appears to have the HD timing cover and water pump with the large bypass hose coming from the tstat housing.
The double tstat housing looks like one for a FT powered N series, the top hose outlet on F series pointed up.
What I can see of the exhaust manifold appears to be a standard FE pickup item
 
  #13  
Old 03-07-2018, 08:02 PM
wsu0702's Avatar
wsu0702
wsu0702 is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 140
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Krewat
Over the next few days, I'll try and find the documentation I was given. It had part numbers for a lot of things.

BTW, I'm not entire sure the 330 in these things was "heavy duty" - the XD moniker was just a "we're not sure what to call it" - like Destroked said, I'm thinking it was an FE style head.
Krewat I used to think the same that the 330XD was some sort of Hybrid with a combination of FT and FE parts. But then I ran across the 2008 post linked below on this forum . It explains the origin of the 330XD engine. According to this post it uses all HD FT parts except for the oil bath air cleaner and special exhaust manifolds to fit into the F350 chassis. I am not sure how accurate this info is but it does line-up with what I have heard from owners of these trucks. When you get a chance please post the info from your files that you referred to as I am curious to learn more about these engines.
 
  #14  
Old 03-07-2018, 10:57 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,837
Received 1,583 Likes on 1,291 Posts
This is the entire thread from which the link in the last post was lifted:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...he-330-hd.html

That thread also links to other threads on the 330XD.
 
  #15  
Old 03-08-2018, 12:12 AM
wsu0702's Avatar
wsu0702
wsu0702 is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 140
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
This is the entire thread from which the link in the last post was lifted:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...he-330-hd.html

That thread also links to other threads on the 330XD.
Thanks I meant to attach the link not sure where it went.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: I have a 79 U-Haul with a 330 HD in it tough engine runs great but it's a slug , does



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.