Notices
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Bumpsides Ford Truck

Disc Brake Conversion Nightmare!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 11, 2017 | 10:46 PM
  #1  
sublauxation's Avatar
sublauxation
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Disc Brake Conversion Nightmare!

Hope I'm not braking any rules on this one but wanted to get this out there and give a heads up somewhere.

I bought a 4 wheel disc conversion for my 67 from Classic Disc Brakes out of Texas (also does business as Superior Mustang Parts out of Colorado).

Talking on the phone everything seemed on the up and up but I had a complete nightmare with shipping and actually getting parts. I waited a couple weeks for the first boxes to arrive but quickly realized a lot of parts were missing. From there I went through about a month of "it shipped out yesterday" or "it will ship out tonight". It's one thing to have a delay but the constant lying about it.........

Everything did finally come but it's far from the "bolt on" kit he said it would be. Front wheel bearings were wrong, had to make and adapter for the front brake hoses and cut a notch in the fire wall for the brake booster. The rear rotors don't fit over the axle flange. Once that is resolved I can only hope the calipers fit!

In the end we'll make it all work but not through any of his help. The instructions he sent are just a couple pictures and if I call for help, "he'll get back to me". Yeah, still waiting for that one!

Worst part is the truck is at my dad's 300 miles away and I planned a couple weekends to go down with my 13 year old to work on it (he's already claimed the truck as his in 3 years!), only the parts weren't there. With the way time plays out now he wont be able to get his hands dirty on it before it's done.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 06:47 AM
  #2  
lilorbie's Avatar
lilorbie
Laughing Gas
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 102
From: The Hotel California
thanks for the info.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 07:18 AM
  #3  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
The front disc components (from their website) looks like pieces parts from various automotive manufacturers. The booster looks like a Bendix unit for a '67-'70 Mustang.

Judging by the prices just for these items from them, you could have gotten a disc brake front suspension from a '75-'79 F100/F150 and a brake booster/mounting brackets from a '68-'72, rebuilt all of it and come out cheaper. It would have been Ford components engineered to fit without cutting/modifying anything and it would keep things simple when it's time to service or replace any of the items, being from one manufacturer --Ford.

Aftermarket bolt-on kits are enticing to people to just remove the front drums and slap the disc brake conversion components on and roll with it. The problem is most of these old trucks needs new I-beam bushings, radius arm bushings, kingpins, kingpin bushings and steering linkages. The brakes will only function as good as the foundation they're bolted to. If the foundation is worn out and sloppy, the brakes aren't going to work at their full potential.

If you're having to remove the front suspension to replace these parts, it just makes better sense to me to install a Dentside front disc/suspension.

I also noticed on the review of this vendor they get a 1-star rating.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 08:12 AM
  #4  
sublauxation's Avatar
sublauxation
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
He has a D or F on the BBB website but there were only a couple complaints and really the BBB is relatively meaningless. There are few if any reviews of "Classic Disc Brakes." I only found the other ratings once I found his personal name and was able to link it to "Superior Mustang Parts."

There were other ways of doing this conversion and I considered them all. My front end is otherwise pretty solid and I have more than enough projects going on, thus I took what may or may not have been the easy way out. Time will tell. Odds are this will be one of the last, if not the last, brake jobs this truck sees in my lifetime, and regardless I have the part #s for everything.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 09:09 AM
  #5  
ultraranger's Avatar
ultraranger
Lead Driver
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,399
Likes: 40
From: El Dorado, Arkansas
If the guy deals in early Mustang parts, that would explain the booster he's using as a conversion on an F100 --although, as you've found out, the stud mounting pattern doesn't match up to the existing pattern on your firewall.

That booster also has a very short input rod that's curved at the eyelet. This is to modify the pedal ratio when installed in an early Mustang. Early '67-'70 Mustangs had two different brake pedals; a shorter one for manual brakes and a longer pedal for power brakes. The longer power brake pedal mounted to a fulcrum point high up on the Mustang brake pedal support, compared to where the shorter manual brake pedal attached.

On a '67 F-series, the Mustang booster input rod may connect to the stock F-series brake pedal. On a '68-'72, it might fall a little short since the '67 pedal/pedal support is different from '68-'72. The fulcrum (pivot point) is closer to the front of the pedal hanger on a '67 F-series than on the '68-'72 models.



Comparing Clutch/Brake Pedals and Brackets - FORDification.com
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 10:26 AM
  #6  
sublauxation's Avatar
sublauxation
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
The picture is generic, not representative of the kit for the F100.

Whatever booster it was, the bolt pattern lined up but the angle somehow didn't work out for the rod without a little modification. Aside from the bearings I'll give him credit as the front seemed to go together well. With some more modification the back will work.

The biggest issue is the dozen lies concerning shipping and complete lack of support. I called him last night and again just now, leaving messages for him to call me back (pretty sure he has caller ID) that will never be returned.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 10:27 AM
  #7  
sublauxation's Avatar
sublauxation
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
He said the outer front bearings on a '67 differ vs a 68-71. Any idea if that's truly the case? In my search I've never seen that they differed but then most of what was referenced was only the king pin size.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 11:30 AM
  #8  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by sublauxation
He said the outer front bearings on a '67 differ vs a 68-72. Any idea if that's truly the case?
1961/67 F100 2WD's have 11" x 2" front drum brakes. 1968/72 F100 2WD's have 11" x 3" front drum brakes.

1961/67 F100 2WD: B5A-1216-A .. Outer Bearing-stamped: LM-11949 & B5A-1217-A .. Outer Race-stamped: LM-11910

1968/72 F100 2WD: C3SZ-1216-A .. Outer Bearing-stamped: M-12649 & C3SZ-1217-A .. Outer Race-stamped: M-12610

1973/79 F100 2WD's & 1975/79 F150 2WD's with front discs use different inner & outer bearings/races.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 12:15 PM
  #9  
Freightrain's Avatar
Freightrain
Lead Driver
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,893
Likes: 12
From: Ohio
Club FTE Silver Member

That is what you will find in these trucks is the fact the early ones(like '67) don't always have the same parts as later models. Just like other things in the '67 that don't match 68-up.

Bill, does the front bearings match what was on the '66-earlier trucks? Were they 2" drums too?

I've seen this before where someone bought a kit to do a disc brake conversion and ended up with an expensive mess where if they had only known how simple it was to use existing OEM parts.

Many years back I put disc brakes on the front of my '64 Galaxie. '77 Tbird spindles/calipers bolt right on. Nothing expensive to buy or adapters to use.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 12:56 PM
  #10  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by NumberDummy

1957/67 F100 2WD: B5A-1216-A .. Outer Bearing-stamped: LM-11949 & B5A-1217-A .. Outer Race-stamped: LM-11910
Notice 1957/67, originally it said 1961/67.

The inner bearings (B7C-1201-A) & races (B7C-1202-A) are the same: 1957/72 F100 2WD
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2017 | 02:49 PM
  #11  
sublauxation's Avatar
sublauxation
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Thanks for all the #s!

Would that also mean the spindle shaft length on the 67 is shorter vs 68/69?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
edsteffan
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
54
Sep 20, 2015 11:19 PM
74ford4x4
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Jan 19, 2011 12:52 PM
billemc
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
Mar 10, 2005 02:04 PM
dan_l
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Oct 5, 2004 11:23 PM
dads truck
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
Sep 17, 2004 06:58 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE