Another Coolant thread as not all EC-1s are the same
#16
Stewart
#17
#18
#19
Originally Posted by TooManyToys.
Arrgh.
“Especially since I need to re-do my head gaskets and flush the cooling system all over again.”
Why do you think the first went sideways?
“Especially since I need to re-do my head gaskets and flush the cooling system all over again.”
Why do you think the first went sideways?
I put a properly calibrated torque wrench to it last July while I had the injectors out and found quite a few inconsistent values. 180 ft/lbs here, 200 ft/lbs there, and a few were close to the 210 ft/lb spec, but it was all over the place, so now it has to be redone.
Once I get the cash and parts together, I’m taking it to a buddy’s shop, pulling the engine, and doing it myself, so I know everything is done correctly and to my satisfaction.
#20
#21
I liked your other reply better, lol
It perfectly explains why Ford uses that method compared to the torque spec method.
I wish ARP offered something like that to make 100% certain you reached the correct and accurate torque on every stud every time.
I'll PM you, but back on topic...
It perfectly explains why Ford uses that method compared to the torque spec method.
I wish ARP offered something like that to make 100% certain you reached the correct and accurate torque on every stud every time.
I'll PM you, but back on topic...
#22
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ExPACamper
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
14
05-13-2015 04:28 PM
bobj49f2
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
11-06-2011 08:15 AM