Head gasket thickness vs valve lash
#1
Head gasket thickness vs valve lash
In the process of rebuilding my 351, I swapped from E6SE heads to E7s because of a bad valve seat. I do know that since they are both production heads I shouldn't need new pushrods... But, what if I wanted to close my quench distance? And went from a .047 gasket to a .040 is there normally enough room to do this in a ford or do I need a pushrod length checker?
#2
In the process of rebuilding my 351, I swapped from E6SE heads to E7s because of a bad valve seat. I do know that since they are both production heads I shouldn't need new pushrods... But, what if I wanted to close my quench distance? And went from a .047 gasket to a .040 is there normally enough room to do this in a ford or do I need a pushrod length checker?
Depending on your valve clearance you could go even thinner than .040, but before you buy anything I would suggest checking your piston height in relation to the block.
#3
I had it all written down at one point but can't find the paperwork go figure. But it was a found to be a generic rebuild and if I remember correctly, the pistons are "pretty far" in the hole. That's why I was asking. The original plan was to be done with this swap a year ago but well life happens so now I'm trying to get it finished.
#4
I had it all written down at one point but can't find the paperwork go figure. But it was a found to be a generic rebuild and if I remember correctly, the pistons are "pretty far" in the hole. That's why I was asking. The original plan was to be done with this swap a year ago but well life happens so now I'm trying to get it finished.
What I did for my build, and I hope someone could confirm if this is right or not, was to take a dial gauge with magnetic base to find TDC, then I took a straight edge and feelers to determine how far in the hole. I was only about .010 +/-, so I went with a .029 gasket. IMO it's worth it as an ideal quench will help reduce detonation and perhaps up the compression a bit.
#5
I seem to recall reading on one of the piston maker's sites that ideal quench is about .040", so using the thin gasket it a good idea. You have to be careful with oversize pistons, it used to be common practice for them to be "de-stroked" to end up with about the original compression ratio.
So a +.030" piston would sit .030" lower in the cylinder. A really bad idea, since that actually increases chances of detonation, as well as lowers efficiency and power very slightly.
So a +.030" piston would sit .030" lower in the cylinder. A really bad idea, since that actually increases chances of detonation, as well as lowers efficiency and power very slightly.
#6
Yes, between .040 and .044 is good. I've gone as tight as .037 on a build with no issues, but that was a clay each piston and measure piston to valve clearance.
I think the reason I'm over thinking this is because its my first nonadjustable valvetrain build. Even the other fords were upgraded to adjustable rockers so close was a nut turn away from right. This thing is measure for the pushrod and bolt it down...
I think the reason I'm over thinking this is because its my first nonadjustable valvetrain build. Even the other fords were upgraded to adjustable rockers so close was a nut turn away from right. This thing is measure for the pushrod and bolt it down...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mlevario99
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
24
07-16-2007 11:54 PM
Third Coast
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
10-15-2005 10:48 AM