1941 Ford Dually

  #16  
Old 06-28-2017, 09:17 AM
GB SISSON's Avatar
GB SISSON
GB SISSON is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orcas Island Wa.
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 47 Posts
One thing you will find with the C 10 is that your truck has very large fender openings to accomodate the 20" tires that could be up to 38" tall. 15" tires will look really small in there. And yes, you could put modern style 18s or 20s but they aren't any taller than an old school 7.00 x 15. As for the grille, I have built several. Depending on the 'look' you are going for, I think rebar could be cool.
 
  #17  
Old 06-30-2017, 10:33 AM
Jason LaDouceur's Avatar
Jason LaDouceur
Jason LaDouceur is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Update, I have all the fenders off and the inside gutted and ready to remove the cab.
 
  #18  
Old 06-30-2017, 09:56 PM
tinman52's Avatar
tinman52
tinman52 is offline
Welder User

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: northwest MT
Posts: 5,261
Received 30 Likes on 19 Posts
Grab a tape measure and see what the track width is on the Ford, then go measure the Chevy. Should be about a foot difference, the tires will stick way out.
These old trucks just don't work on a later chassis. They are too narrow. My suggestion would be to keep the original chassis. Update the drivetrain if you must.....
My 2 cents
 
  #19  
Old 07-07-2017, 10:55 PM
Jason LaDouceur's Avatar
Jason LaDouceur
Jason LaDouceur is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was wondering if someone could help me with finding information on this number in the pic. It is off of the tranny bellhousing. I believe it is the VIN but I am unable to find any info on it. like year or anything.
 
  #20  
Old 07-08-2017, 01:21 AM
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
willowbilly3 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Just my opinion but there really isn't much easier or cheaper about a chevy and you really shoot yourself in the foot if you ever want to sell it because Ford guys don't like seeing chevy engines in them. The 80s full size pickup chassis are too wide, old trucks on them never look right. An S10 or Ford explorer chassis is a much better choice.
 
  #21  
Old 07-08-2017, 07:45 AM
tacomacream's Avatar
tacomacream
tacomacream is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Wenatchee
Posts: 1,411
Received 23 Likes on 21 Posts
[QUOTE=Jason LaDouceur;17313187]I was wondering if someone could help me with finding information on this number in the pic. It is off of the tranny bellhousing. I believe it is the VIN but I am unable to find any info on it. like year or anything.

Early Ford Serial Numbers For Cars and Trucks Manufactured for the USA Market from 1932 to 1953

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicl...ication_number
 
  #22  
Old 07-08-2017, 09:44 AM
46fordtruck's Avatar
46fordtruck
46fordtruck is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 2,629
Received 26 Likes on 15 Posts
The last numbers help to narrow down the year, it was a range of numbers. G means G series 6 ('41 was the first of these) and the T is heavy duty truck. So the number you see, shows your truck as a 1941 heavy duty with G series 6 cylinder.
 
  #23  
Old 07-08-2017, 09:45 AM
GB SISSON's Avatar
GB SISSON
GB SISSON is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orcas Island Wa.
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 47 Posts
And while we are giving you our opinions... I hope someday to mount my 1/2 ton 46 on an toyota landcruiser chassis. I have an fj 55 which is the older wagon and a couple inches narrower than the ford, but I also have a Canadian version BJ 60 which has a factory four cyl diesel. Both run well but are rusty as all get out. WMS to WMS on the jailbar pickup is 59 1/4" and the diesel landcruiser is 58 7/8". After I complete my current project I want to remove the rotten husk off the BJ 60 and take some measurements. It may be better to swap the running gear to the ford frame, but maybe not. Anyone who pays attention to the auto/truck industry will have to agree that the landcruiser platform is far more robust than an explorer and miles ahead of an S 10. They are out there cheap when rusty and they DO rust. You'd have 4wd, ps,pb no computers or tangle of wires. Just a thought to stir the pot on a Saturday morning.
 
  #24  
Old 07-09-2017, 08:10 AM
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
willowbilly3 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by GB SISSON
And while we are giving you our opinions... I hope someday to mount my 1/2 ton 46 on an toyota landcruiser chassis. I have an fj 55 which is the older wagon and a couple inches narrower than the ford, but I also have a Canadian version BJ 60 which has a factory four cyl diesel. Both run well but are rusty as all get out. WMS to WMS on the jailbar pickup is 59 1/4" and the diesel landcruiser is 58 7/8". After I complete my current project I want to remove the rotten husk off the BJ 60 and take some measurements. It may be better to swap the running gear to the ford frame, but maybe not. Anyone who pays attention to the auto/truck industry will have to agree that the landcruiser platform is far more robust than an explorer and miles ahead of an S 10. They are out there cheap when rusty and they DO rust. You'd have 4wd, ps,pb no computers or tangle of wires. Just a thought to stir the pot on a Saturday morning.
I agree. A body/chassis swap is a lot of work no matter how you cut it and it only makes sense to put a little extra time (and money) into finding parts that fit well together. Using something just because it's cheap or easy to source will look the part. I'm saving a 76 ScoutII for the frame and axles. Kinda thinking about putting the 62 Ranchero on it but haven't done much more than tape it, don't know what kind of butchery will be involved.
 
  #25  
Old 07-09-2017, 09:11 AM
FireEngineMike's Avatar
FireEngineMike
FireEngineMike is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Webster, NY
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Decades ago I read an article in Road & Track about a German company that put a VW Rabbit body onto a Porsche 928. You could widen the truck cab to fit on the modern chassis. BTW, this is not a serious suggestion, but it would be way cool.
 
  #26  
Old 07-09-2017, 11:24 AM
GB SISSON's Avatar
GB SISSON
GB SISSON is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orcas Island Wa.
Posts: 6,034
Likes: 0
Received 90 Likes on 47 Posts
Originally Posted by willowbilly3
I agree. A body/chassis swap is a lot of work no matter how you cut it and it only makes sense to put a little extra time (and money) into finding parts that fit well together. Using something just because it's cheap or easy to source will look the part. I'm saving a 76 ScoutII for the frame and axles. Kinda thinking about putting the 62 Ranchero on it but haven't done much more than tape it, don't know what kind of butchery will be involved.
Would it be a scoutchero or a ranchout? Either way I vote YES.
 
  #27  
Old 07-09-2017, 11:34 AM
Scndsin's Avatar
Scndsin
Scndsin is online now
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 11,173
Received 760 Likes on 542 Posts
A vote & a plea for keeping it Ford. So much potential with that truck.

351/5.8, carb or EFI, C6/M5OD/ZF, Stock rear/8.8/9/Sterling

Front end could use anything. Stock & add juice shocks & a power Borgenson steering box.

Do it all out of the JY.
 
  #28  
Old 07-09-2017, 05:19 PM
white 66's Avatar
white 66
white 66 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 909
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Bet someone could use the parts...

Originally Posted by Scndsin
A vote & a plea for keeping it Ford. So much potential with that truck.

351/5.8, carb or EFI, C6/M5OD/ZF, Stock rear/8.8/9/Sterling

Front end could use anything. Stock & add juice shocks & a power Borgenson steering box.

Do it all out of the JY.
Bet someone could use the 6 cyl parts off of that old girl.
 
  #29  
Old 07-13-2017, 08:18 AM
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
willowbilly3 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Keep all the small donors in mind. The old Chevy luvs make a great frame donor. My neighbor has a 46 cab on one, nice fit.
 
  #30  
Old 07-13-2017, 08:31 AM
willowbilly3's Avatar
willowbilly3
willowbilly3 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Black Hills of SD
Posts: 8,209
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by GB SISSON
Would it be a scoutchero or a ranchout? Either way I vote YES.
Binderup????
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fire.ice07
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
14
01-13-2019 03:52 PM
roadbag
Idaho Chapter
3
01-11-2017 08:40 AM
Midnite1987
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
08-09-2011 09:13 PM
Cap'n Tea Bag
Performance & General Engine Building
6
01-28-2006 03:25 AM
13MWZ
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
10-22-2004 03:39 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 1941 Ford Dually



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.