2015 + Expedition & Navigator 2015 + Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator

SWB or LWB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-18-2017, 07:34 PM
dlcorbett's Avatar
dlcorbett
dlcorbett is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 328
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
SWB or LWB

After looking through the forum, (old posts) and trying to do the money math i think its also worthwhile to get owners thoughts. What are peoples experiences with the two different wheelbases? What are the pros and cons of the two? Is their anyone who would want to reverse their decision? Sorry if this post seems redundant.
 
  #2  
Old 06-20-2017, 08:28 PM
glockholiday's Avatar
glockholiday
glockholiday is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: AZ
Posts: 861
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
I have the EL and think the short version would be unusable for me. Cant even fit a load of groceries behind the 3rd row. At least for my family of 5.
 
  #3  
Old 06-22-2017, 12:41 AM
YoGeorge's Avatar
YoGeorge
YoGeorge is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,509
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
If you often use the 3rd row for people, you should probably consider the EL. Even if you only use 2 rows, consider how much stuff you will usually carry while you have 4 people in the vehicle.

The EL can carry 4x8 sheets of stuff behind the front seat, which might be a consideration.

On the other hand, consider where you have to park the Expy; if you have an 18 foot deep garage spot, the EL ain't gonna fit...

George
 
  #4  
Old 06-22-2017, 03:27 PM
NevadaGeo's Avatar
NevadaGeo
NevadaGeo is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I come to the Expedition from driving F-150s for years. I have the SWB and really enjoy the turning radius. I sometimes use my Expy for geologic field work off road, so it makes sense for me.
 
  #5  
Old 06-22-2017, 08:07 PM
dlcorbett's Avatar
dlcorbett
dlcorbett is offline
Tuned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 328
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Is the range btw the 2 that much greater? My nav now on thoughtful cruising(65ish) will do about 500 miles. I think the extra length kinda intimidates the wife.
 
  #6  
Old 06-23-2017, 04:38 AM
hank_2010's Avatar
hank_2010
hank_2010 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have a regular and I wish it was the EL. I find that I constantly need that extra bit of space when I load something into the back. Not to mention as stated above, with the 3rd row seats up there is basically no cargo space behind them. The next one I buy will be an EL for sure!
 
  #7  
Old 06-23-2017, 11:01 AM
YoGeorge's Avatar
YoGeorge
YoGeorge is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Detroit
Posts: 4,509
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by dlcorbett
Is the range btw the 2 that much greater? My nav now on thoughtful cruising(65ish) will do about 500 miles. I think the extra length kinda intimidates the wife.
If your wife is gonna be driving it and parking it at the mall/grocery store, etc, the extra length will make it tougher. When we had one of our full size vans, my wife was "hit by a parked car" once...

On range I think the regular length holds 28 gallons and the EL 33ish. My bladder will give out long before I use up 28 gallons.

George
 
  #8  
Old 06-23-2017, 09:06 PM
jh225's Avatar
jh225
jh225 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EL

People in the front seats.
People in the 2nd row seats
300lbs of dogs in the rear cargo area with cage panel between 2nd row and rear cargo

Try doing that in the standard model.
 
  #9  
Old 06-24-2017, 07:28 AM
Slowpoke Slim's Avatar
Slowpoke Slim
Slowpoke Slim is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 1,167
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
We've been looking at the EL's, and comparing them to the standard length. For us, I think we'll go EL. We have 4 labrador retrievers that take up a LOT of rear cargo space, and that's with the 3rd row seat folded down, lol.

I hear you on the bladder thing George, hahaha.
 
  #10  
Old 06-26-2017, 06:34 PM
Randy_270's Avatar
Randy_270
Randy_270 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Manitoba
Posts: 842
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
My wife and I will be trading our Explorer in for a 2018 Expedition Max. Our first kid will be here in December and we travel a lot with our two dogs. Just makes it easier to take lots of stuff and keep it all heated. I'd really suggest for those that only want/need a swb, and don't tow, an Explorer would be a better choice, but that's just my personal opinion.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rjd75
2007 - 2014 Expedition & Navigator
16
06-17-2010 06:53 PM
khelms_98
1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator
28
02-21-2005 09:09 AM
Rtpjunior
1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator
50
10-16-2004 08:04 AM
ExBMWTurnFx4SCrew
1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator
8
02-15-2004 03:11 PM
dan_s_johnson
1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator
3
07-14-2003 04:56 PM



Quick Reply: SWB or LWB



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.