General NON-Automotive Conversation No Political, Sexual or Religious topics please.

Trump Cuts the EPA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-29-2017, 12:34 AM
MadeInDade's Avatar
MadeInDade
MadeInDade is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Trump Cuts the EPA

So yesterday, President Trump signed an executive order to start rolling back some of the over regulations from the EPA. Could we be so lucky as to see DPF, DEF, EGR, SCR go away in the coming years?
 
  #2  
Old 03-29-2017, 12:41 AM
Chris Crews's Avatar
Chris Crews
Chris Crews is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I highly doubt this will go away. I doubt they will throw away " progress ". Why go back? Why destroy progress you have sunk millions into and then when the next president comes around and re instates these regulations they have to spend money to get back to where they were
 
  #3  
Old 03-29-2017, 03:40 AM
44Dan44's Avatar
44Dan44
44Dan44 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Quad Cities Illinois
Posts: 538
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Grabs popcorn.
Glad "progress" was in quotes.
Pence will reinstate them 8 years from now?
 
  #4  
Old 03-29-2017, 05:29 AM
RJC2's Avatar
RJC2
RJC2 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Hatfield's side of river
Posts: 1,117
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As good as Trump and Pence may make things, today, this Country swings left and right. The scary thing is that the extreme left is getting organized, vocal and very nasty. (ie. Madonna and Ashley Judd)
 
  #5  
Old 03-29-2017, 05:43 AM
Chris Crews's Avatar
Chris Crews
Chris Crews is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I agree and I voted for trump and I hope he does great things but cutting the EPA to the point of it affecting emissions on vehicles that companies have already spent millions into getting them perfectly lined up with the engines etc. I don't see it. I don't see a company back peddling when it can cause the company bad publicity from the left and my generation that is extremely eco friendly
 
  #6  
Old 03-29-2017, 05:59 AM
44Dan44's Avatar
44Dan44
44Dan44 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Quad Cities Illinois
Posts: 538
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Irony: An extremely eco friendly generation choosing a lifted gas (fuel) guzzler over a Prius.
 
Attached Images  
  #7  
Old 03-29-2017, 06:10 AM
Chris Crews's Avatar
Chris Crews
Chris Crews is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 44Dan44
Irony: An extremely eco friendly generation choosing a lifted gas (fuel) guzzler over a Prius.
me personally I could care less about emissions but that's not the case for the majority
 
  #8  
Old 03-29-2017, 06:16 AM
44Dan44's Avatar
44Dan44
44Dan44 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Quad Cities Illinois
Posts: 538
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris Crews
me personally I could care less about emissions but that's not the case for the majority
The majority voted differently. So maybe, like you, the majority could care less as well. (Note: you will not hear this on the "news")
 
  #9  
Old 03-29-2017, 06:27 AM
fordman19762003's Avatar
fordman19762003
fordman19762003 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,267
Received 206 Likes on 141 Posts
The stuff that's already in place will not change. Maybe we'll see a reduction in some new regs, but that is about all I expect to see.
 
  #10  
Old 03-29-2017, 06:52 AM
69cj's Avatar
69cj
69cj is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Middle Tn.
Posts: 13,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Don't forget the states can also have their own regs. Ca. had stiffer vehicle emissions regs. for years until they were standardized by the Feds.
 
  #11  
Old 03-29-2017, 07:23 AM
UGA33's Avatar
UGA33
UGA33 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cartersville, Ga
Posts: 5,648
Received 128 Likes on 65 Posts
No need to remove what is already in place. The trucks are getting more reliable as time goes on with the emissions in place. It would be nice for the automakers to have a chance to breathe though. Give em a few years to possibly see if they could accomplish the same emissions standards without using certain methods or equipment. With how far common rail injection has come in the last 10 years, who knows what is possible.
 
  #12  
Old 03-29-2017, 07:49 AM
fordmantpw's Avatar
fordmantpw
fordmantpw is online now
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central MO
Posts: 2,706
Received 423 Likes on 136 Posts
Originally Posted by UGA33
No need to remove what is already in place. The trucks are getting more reliable as time goes on with the emissions in place. It would be nice for the automakers to have a chance to breathe though. Give em a few years to possibly see if they could accomplish the same emissions standards without using certain methods or equipment. With how far common rail injection has come in the last 10 years, who knows what is possible.
Says the one who has removed what was already in place!

Agreed though! This sounds perfectly reasonable.
 
  #13  
Old 03-29-2017, 08:01 AM
senix's Avatar
senix
senix is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 36,580
Received 1,412 Likes on 1,007 Posts
Think of how gas motors were in the '70's with the energy crisis and emissions. It was a jungle under the hood.


I said it in 2008 with the first generation of DPF's that it would get better with more experience and expertise. It has.


there is no rolling back, just keeping in place. This will allow the technology to mature and become a more refined process.


Once that takes place I believe you will either see a reduction in components or a reduction in size.
 
  #14  
Old 03-29-2017, 08:07 AM
fordmantpw's Avatar
fordmantpw
fordmantpw is online now
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central MO
Posts: 2,706
Received 423 Likes on 136 Posts
Originally Posted by senix
Think of how gas motors were in the '70's with the energy crisis and emissions. It was a jungle under the hood.


I said it in 2008 with the first generation of DPF's that it would get better with more experience and expertise. It has.


there is no rolling back, just keeping in place. This will allow the technology to mature and become a more refined process.


Once that takes place I believe you will either see a reduction in components or a reduction in size.
And hopefully a reduction in their cost as well as effect on fuel economy!
 
  #15  
Old 03-29-2017, 08:13 AM
UGA33's Avatar
UGA33
UGA33 is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cartersville, Ga
Posts: 5,648
Received 128 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by fordmantpw
Says the one who has removed what was already in place!

Agreed though! This sounds perfectly reasonable.

When they get it to my "liking", I'll leave it alone!
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.