2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

F150's New 4.8L V8 should be a Force to reckon with!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-17-2016, 10:04 AM
DallasSuperCrew's Avatar
DallasSuperCrew
DallasSuperCrew is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
F150's New 4.8L V8 should be a Force to reckon with!

Interesting stuff:
Report: Ford F-150 Getting Next-Gen 4.8L V-8
 
  #2  
Old 11-17-2016, 10:28 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Cool! A bit surprising they would replace the Coyote so soon though.
 
  #3  
Old 11-17-2016, 12:33 PM
DallasSuperCrew's Avatar
DallasSuperCrew
DallasSuperCrew is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
CAFE Regulations may be?
 
  #4  
Old 11-17-2016, 12:47 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Perhaps. Every generation in recent memory has been a substantial improvement over the outgoing, and I'd expect this to be no different. Hopefully they get it right the first time!
 
  #5  
Old 11-17-2016, 03:08 PM
FORDTRK#1's Avatar
FORDTRK#1
FORDTRK#1 is offline
New User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is cool news; I'm wondering if they'll be using it in the Mustang as well?
 
  #6  
Old 11-17-2016, 04:13 PM
Delta Echo's Avatar
Delta Echo
Delta Echo is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The article speculates about having cylinder deactivation. I would much rather have a 3.5EB than any V8 with cylinder deactivation. It has caused issues on every brand of engine that has tried it, and is a very bad idea. The very small gain in fuel economy is not worth the initial added cost and complexity, and the cost of problems down the road.
 
  #7  
Old 11-17-2016, 04:34 PM
JKBrad's Avatar
JKBrad
JKBrad is offline
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 7,401
Received 804 Likes on 589 Posts
A Super Duty version?
 
  #8  
Old 11-17-2016, 04:53 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
A heavily built EcoBoost 4.8L sounds perfect for Super Duty use.
 
  #9  
Old 11-17-2016, 05:21 PM
DallasSuperCrew's Avatar
DallasSuperCrew
DallasSuperCrew is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FORDTRK#1
That is cool news; I'm wondering if they'll be using it in the Mustang as well?
Yes, Mustang GT. Ford F-150 May Receive New 4.8L V8 | Ford Authority
 
  #10  
Old 11-17-2016, 05:39 PM
JKBrad's Avatar
JKBrad
JKBrad is offline
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 7,401
Received 804 Likes on 589 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
A heavily built EcoBoost 4.8L sounds perfect for Super Duty use.
Yes it does, and would be awesome. However, nothing I have read points to an EcoBoost version. I would certainly look hard at a Super Duty if it was equipped that way.
 
  #11  
Old 11-17-2016, 06:57 PM
Jus Cruisin's Avatar
Jus Cruisin
Jus Cruisin is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If a 4.8l Ecoboost ended up in a 250, I'd be bugging my dealer to swap me out of the 150.
 
  #12  
Old 11-17-2016, 07:17 PM
Schlotzky's Avatar
Schlotzky
Schlotzky is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pleased to see they aren't planning on phasing the V8 out entirely. As impressive as the EBs are, there was no way I could give up the simplicity and beauty (and SOUND) of a Ford V8 when I ordered mine. I was (am) very disappointed to see where the engine options are going for the F150, and was worried that the 5.0 would be the last V8 to see F150 duty. Now how about that EB V8?
 
  #13  
Old 11-17-2016, 09:57 PM
brokenleg's Avatar
brokenleg
brokenleg is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,493
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Not crazy about cylinder deactivation..........................
 
  #14  
Old 11-18-2016, 12:04 AM
onug's Avatar
onug
onug is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I'm still having a bromance with my EB, but I too am glad to see the V8 being updated and preserved as an engine option. I've always wondered why Ford never added cylinder deactivation to their previous gen platforms. But I've never owned one, so can't comment on the reliability.

I bet CAFE is the primary reason given the speed at which this replaces the Coyote. I really don't keep up on the GM and Fiat competition anymore, but it seems like the 5.0 is a solid contender and had room to grow within the current architecture.
 
  #15  
Old 11-18-2016, 07:51 AM
Schlotzky's Avatar
Schlotzky
Schlotzky is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The coyote is a little behind the times in terms of current technologies, so I'm not really surprised they have to do major revisions to bring it up to the latest standards. Not that they couldn't do this is a "second gen" coyote. Definitely the coyote is competitive with the GM/Ram engines in terms of power and refinement, though. I drove all of them, and I would rank the 5.0 #2, just behind the Chevy 6.2L, which is an expensive upgrade over their 5.3L.

I'm not worried about cylinder deactivation. I had it on my 5.7L Hemi and had no issues, and really heard of very few issues with it overall. I've heard some mixed bag issues with Chevy's system, but the technology has been around long enough that it's pretty reliable these days and not concerning.
 


Quick Reply: F150's New 4.8L V8 should be a Force to reckon with!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.