6.7L Power Stroke Diesel 2011-current Ford Powerstroke 6.7 L turbo diesel engine

FORScan and As-Built Data

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 12-09-2016, 10:56 AM
L3dford's Avatar
L3dford
L3dford is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blkout50
My DPF reached 85% and I DID NOT get "Hold OK to Clean" message. Bad news is that I have a DTC error. Good news is that I have a DTC error. This gives me a place to start looking. I changed my setting back to my originals (720-01-01 EA21 BA83 FF70, enable DPF screen) for now and cleared the DTC.
I've tried this with the same result. I've never had the option show up. I also never received the DTC you saw which is very odd it did that.
BTW on '13-'16 you have to hit 100% full before it will show the option according to the Ford manual. 11's-12's are 85%

I have a '13
 
  #47  
Old 12-09-2016, 11:17 AM
blkout50's Avatar
blkout50
blkout50 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 302
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by L3dford
I've tried this with the same result. I've never had the option show up. I also never received the DTC you saw which is very odd it did that.
BTW on '13-'16 you have to hit 100% full before it will show the option according to the Ford manual. 11's-12's are 85%

I have a '13

That's right, I had forgotten about '13~'16 needing to hit 100%

I thought it was strange to get the DTC also. It does lead me to think that their needs to be another setting in combination to make the OCR work.

Thank you for your input. All the information we gather can help solve this mystery.
 
The following users liked this post:
  #48  
Old 12-09-2016, 01:09 PM
Trash Hauler's Avatar
Trash Hauler
Trash Hauler is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 133
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
Mike, Keith and everyone else contributing to this, Thank You .

I reprogrammed the DRL to turn signals and all works as advertised.

While I was at it, my DPF is at 90% so I figured I would play around with those settings and at least duplicate other results .

My DPF screen was enabled by my dealership.
720-01-01 EA21 BA83 FFF0

However, I am unable to change it. If I change the last set from FFF0 to FF70, it will write successfully but immediately reverts to FFF0. Any other changes to the second set or last set (BA82 7FEF or anything else) results in a write fail. It gets to 50% then reports a connection failure.

I get the same error if I go into IPC module (not as built) and attempt to change force regen from enabled to disabled.

Not sure if I am experiencing another operator headspace and timing issue or if this is a legitimate problem but I the moment, I am unable to test the theory.

Bob
 
  #49  
Old 12-09-2016, 01:52 PM
blkout50's Avatar
blkout50
blkout50 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 302
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Thanks Bob for helping test out our theories.

Enter these settings.
720-01-01 EA21 BA82 7FEF
Edit: just reread your post and seen that these settings are giving you the write error.

Just a quick explaination, the reason that the setting you tried to enter kept changing back is FORScan was replacing your changed setting due to the software doing the hex math and fixing the check sum values.

On the 1st post of this thread, Just Strokin (Larry) linked to the Fusion forum. Their opening post Does a GREAT job of explaining things. Much better than I ever could.

Edit: not sure why you are getting a write failure(?) I don't remember having any problems entering and saving.

Hth,
Mike
 
  #50  
Old 12-09-2016, 03:20 PM
Dakster's Avatar
Dakster
Dakster is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 9,838
Received 111 Likes on 37 Posts
I get write failures on some things as well. maybe I just have a cheap-o ELM adapter. I know mine was $5...
 
  #51  
Old 12-09-2016, 03:52 PM
blkout50's Avatar
blkout50
blkout50 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 302
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Dakster
I get write failures on some things as well. maybe I just have a cheap-o ELM adapter. I know mine was $5...
Very possible. This is what I am using. I have not had any problems with it reading or writing.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B006N...7OL&ref=plSrch
 
  #52  
Old 12-09-2016, 04:11 PM
Just Strokin's Avatar
Just Strokin
Just Strokin is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tallassee, ALabama
Posts: 6,748
Received 98 Likes on 84 Posts
I kinda like my 10 year old USB ELM-OBDII adapter. I like the hard wired over wireless for your stated reasons. I am not using TorqPro so do not need wireless any more
 
  #53  
Old 12-09-2016, 05:18 PM
ZooDad's Avatar
ZooDad
ZooDad is online now
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East TN
Posts: 2,529
Received 590 Likes on 344 Posts
Originally Posted by blkout50
Very possible. This is what I am using. I have not had any problems with it reading or writing.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B006N...7OL&ref=plSrch
same one I'm running have not had an issue
 
  #54  
Old 12-09-2016, 06:14 PM
Trash Hauler's Avatar
Trash Hauler
Trash Hauler is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 133
Received 11 Likes on 6 Posts
I have tried two different bluetooth OBDII adapters and get the same error. Both adapters are cheap ones so that could be the issue. If the attachments come through, one is starting the write process and the other is the error I get. Hopefully I can come up with another adapter and try again.

Bob
 
Attached Images   
  #55  
Old 12-09-2016, 07:21 PM
blkout50's Avatar
blkout50
blkout50 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 302
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I have read in some of the other FORScan forums that some individuals have issues with the inexpensive adapters due to connection issues. I don't remember which adapters they said to stay away from. The one I use was highly recommended, so I went that route.
 
  #56  
Old 12-09-2016, 08:04 PM
Just Strokin's Avatar
Just Strokin
Just Strokin is offline
Post Fiend
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tallassee, ALabama
Posts: 6,748
Received 98 Likes on 84 Posts
This is like the one I use. I think a hard wired insterface might be more stable than WIFI or Bluetooth.

ELM327 USB OBD2 Auto car Diagnostic Tool Car Code Readers Scanner Tool Supports | eBay

 
  #57  
Old 12-09-2016, 08:32 PM
swarf_rat's Avatar
swarf_rat
swarf_rat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Things to be aware of in any of these OBD scanners: the original is called ELM because that company in Canada first developed the code used in the single chip micro. On the first couple of revisions, they didn't bother to blow the security fuses, and it was quickly copied by the Chinese. ELM has since moved on to newer versions, fixed bugs, etc. but have protected their code. 99.9% of the ones you buy on the web are copies and clones of the 1st or 2nd ELM revision, of various (and often dubious) quality. Most of the people making and selling them have no idea how they work, or what bugs and problems could be in the implementation they copied. Some have hacks to fix problems, which themselves create problems. It is almost impossible to buy a genuine ELM based product. The ODBLink is not an ELM clone, but a new implementation that mimics the ELM command set. This allows it to do what the ELM can do (and look compatible to lost of existing software) and also do quite a bit more. It is probably the best one to get (and the most expensive). It is also one of the few that can scan all of the busses in the Ford, not just the primary one. I have purchased several of the clones and taken them apart. You find a range of implementations, some look like they were soldered together by chimps, others are not too bad looking. None of them was a higher revision than ELM 2.1, and several at the same supposed ELM revision behaved quite differently. They are very cheap to buy, but be prepared to buy a few, to find one that actually works.
 
  #58  
Old 12-10-2016, 07:04 AM
blkout50's Avatar
blkout50
blkout50 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 302
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
swarf_rat,
Great info, shows why the inexpensive adapters have write issues. Thanks for sharing!!
Mike
 
  #59  
Old 12-10-2016, 07:57 AM
blkout50's Avatar
blkout50
blkout50 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 302
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Hey everyone,
I found an address setting that was common among three different trucks with OCR. One of the trucks is the one Larry found. Two others are trucks that I found with OCR. In a hurry this morning to get out the door. I will post up the VIN's on the other two trucks this afternoon.

The 726-03-01 addresses that were common among the OCR truck were one bit different among non-OCR trucks. Decided to try these settings since my DPF is at 95%

720-01-01 EA21 BA82 7FEF, OCR trucks
726-03-01 0201 0000 34, OCR trucks

720-01-01 EA21 BA83 FF70, My truck
726-03-01 0201 0001 35, My truck

My truck didn't like the 726-03-01 and would not accept those values from the OCR trucks.

Here is what it did take;
726-03-01 0101 0000 33

So far no DTC's...
 
  #60  
Old 12-10-2016, 04:00 PM
swarf_rat's Avatar
swarf_rat
swarf_rat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keep trying, we are all waiting anxiously....

Has anyone found a way in Forescan to adjust the fuel mileage correction factors? Mine is slightly optimistic and I would like to adjust it.
 


Quick Reply: FORScan and As-Built Data



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 AM.