1978 F250 Sno-fighter package best Carb?
#1
1978 F250 Sno-fighter package best Carb?
My 1978 F250 has been experiencing some upgrades lately, installed a Weiand stealth intake with a Summit racing series 750 double pump carb which has been challenging to tune. The motor is a 1970 Lincoln Mark III 460 motor, just wondering if I should have bought an Edelbrock instead? Was told by a mechanic that the Edelbrock is much better......see attached
IMG_0801.JPG
IMG_0801.JPG
#2
#5
Yes, I had to build a bracket and extend the throttle cable and also the transmission kickback lever after installation of the Weiand stealth intake. As far as the carb goes I will have to run it more, its running much smoother now almost too much power when you get on it. The Lincoln 460 has no emissions and stock was 365hp, the carb came with a dvd that had a math formula to figure out how big of carb to buy which pointed me to the 750cfm. Basically the Summit series racing carbs are identical to Holley with float adjustment just cost less. I was told the Edelbrock's are bolt on without the hassle's or adjustments of the Holley/Summit so that's why I am asking. I also installed a 4 core aluminum radiator with a single wire HEI distributor, definitely woke the motor up quite a bit overall.
#6
Agree the double pumper is best for light race cars... not so good for a heavy truck.
You want vacuum operated secondaries... either Holly or Edelbrock can be fine. I think Summit offers a Holly vacuum secondary clone that may be suitable.
If you do go with Edelbrock, fuel pressure needs to be kept below 5 psi which often requires a regulator.
You want vacuum operated secondaries... either Holly or Edelbrock can be fine. I think Summit offers a Holly vacuum secondary clone that may be suitable.
If you do go with Edelbrock, fuel pressure needs to be kept below 5 psi which often requires a regulator.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
You really need to read up on tuning a Holley double pumper. Lots of good walkthroughs with pictures or videos on youtube. There is the jets, the power valve, the accelerator pump cams, etc. There is a certain order and you can get them dialed in quite nicely.
Don't ever expect a carb to be set up correctly out of the box.
Yes the 750 is a little on the big side. You lose velocity through the carb at lower RPMs with too big a carb that can make it not run correctly.
Don't ever expect a carb to be set up correctly out of the box.
Yes the 750 is a little on the big side. You lose velocity through the carb at lower RPMs with too big a carb that can make it not run correctly.
#10
The consensus I am receiving for feedback is the 750cfm double pumper is not ideal, but could possibly be adjusted to tune better. I did get a video with the carb explaining that the jets would be the first change if necessary. I bought this carb right through Summit, but now am considering a different carb in the future. My truck only has 9,000 original mi on it sat for a long time and I am slowly working out the bugs so to speak. I have noticed a big surge in power to the point where I don't trust my 16 yr old son to drive it even though he badly wants to.
#11
#12
You really need toal read up on tuning a Holley double pumper. Lots of good walkthroughs with pictures or videos on youtube. There is the jets, the power valve, the accelerator pump cams, etc. There is a certain order and you can get them dialed in quite nicely.
Don't ever expect a carb to be set up correctly out of the box.
Yes the 750 is a little on the big side. You lose velocity through the carb at lower RPMs with too big a carb that can make it not run correctly.
Don't ever expect a carb to be set up correctly out of the box.
Yes the 750 is a little on the big side. You lose velocity through the carb at lower RPMs with too big a carb that can make it not run correctly.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
429 FORD POWER
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
2
07-09-2009 11:44 PM
youngguy
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
07-22-2003 09:11 PM