Notices

Simplified Vacuum Lines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2015 | 09:49 PM
  #1  
RevJones's Avatar
RevJones
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Simplified Vacuum Lines

I decided to attempt eliminating all the BS additional vacuum lines in my 78' f-150. It has a 400 and in the late 70's they decided to do a lot of dumb emissions crap. Right now I have the vacuum line from the tranny and from the distributer/vacuum advance hooked up. I've plugged everything else and it seems to run fine but I have concerns. Is there any chance I'm doing any damage to anything? Hate hate hate vacuum lines and would love to hear if anyone else successfully emulated most of theirs. Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2015 | 07:09 AM
  #2  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
For the 80's trucks we need the two you have plus brake booster, HVAC, and cruise - if you have those options. Otherwise, I think you have it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2015 | 11:37 AM
  #3  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Filthy Beast
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Taxachusetts
Agreed.

One of the easiest way to dump a lot of vacuum lines is to get a new 4v intake.

Whatcha mean dumb emisssions crap/retarded timing, low compression? They made our trucks run like *****! Who could ask for anything more? Hahaha
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2015 | 12:18 PM
  #4  
RevJones's Avatar
RevJones
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
4v Motorcraft right? I would rather not worry about getting an edelbrock aftermarket set up. I was told you can re-jet a Motorcraft to have the same "high performance" CFM edelbrock's offer. Is that true?
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 03:43 PM
  #5  
Filthy Beast's Avatar
Filthy Beast
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,698
Likes: 7
From: Taxachusetts
[QUOTE=RevJones; I've plugged everything else and it seems to run fine but I have concerns. Is there any chance I'm doing any damage to anything? [/QUOTE]

No, no damage is being done...did you dump/fix/plug your EGR unit? Might make it run a bit hotter (leaner) with it capped off.

Re-jetting your Motorcraft probably won't do diddly squat for performance unless you add some other aftermarket stuff - headers (a free-er flowing exhaust), for one, a "bigger" cam, etc. All you'll do by increasing jet size is make your vehicle run a bit "richer", leave some sooty deposits on yer plugs and generally waste gas.....not to mention changes in tuning the carb, maybe a hotter plug, etc.

If you're in a higher altitude, yes, but for the most part, without other "perfomance additions", you should be good to go.......let it be until you add some other go faster stuff. The CFM isn't going to change with different jets......just how much fuel is added to the mixture under different situations.

My opinion? Stay with the Motorcraft until you can afford some uprades...like headers, a Weiand and a Holley.
 
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2016 | 05:57 PM
  #6  
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 32,875
Likes: 48
From: Northeast, OK
Right. Jetting, or re-jetting, only changes the air/fuel ratio, meaning how much fuel is in however much air gets pulled through the carb. And an engine wants 14.7 units of air for a unit of fuel to make max power. (Yes, I realize we give most engines more like 12:1 for max power, but that's really because some cylinders run rich and some lean.)

But CFM, or cubic feet per minute is a rating a carb is given that explains how much air will be pulled through it at a given vacuum level. That's not something that can be changed on a given carb. So, if you want more air and fuel to come in you need a larger carb. However, that can cause other problems, like poor drivability.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
'92 Ford
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
0
Jul 5, 2016 03:19 PM
TalonM
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
3
Aug 18, 2014 07:48 AM
nolls
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
May 6, 2009 08:00 PM
abnjumpmaster
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
Mar 2, 2008 11:10 PM
mcguyver
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
5
Jul 26, 2002 05:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE