1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Maybe some help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-09-2015, 10:22 PM
harleyjohn45's Avatar
harleyjohn45
harleyjohn45 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Maybe some help

I built a 1930 Ford roadster hot rod, using a 1953 truck motor, clutch assembly and transmission out of a 1953 Ford PU. I suspect it came out of a 1953 F-250, because its a floor shift 3 speed with the emergency brake as part of the transmission. Generally a 3 speed transmission in 3rd gear has a 1:1 output. Do you think this transmission is a 1:1?


1st gear does not seem to have synchromesh. I have a 1950 Ford sedan 370 differential and was hoping to be able to cruise at 60 mph. At 60, it seems to be running pretty fast. My tachometer may be wrong.


Thanks in advance
John L.
 
  #2  
Old 10-10-2015, 04:46 AM
52 Merc's Avatar
52 Merc
52 Merc is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Burbank, WA
Posts: 13,896
Received 2,423 Likes on 1,379 Posts
The original 3 speed transmissions in all of these trucks were a 1:1 ratio in high gear. First gear was not synchronized. Only second and third.
 
  #3  
Old 10-10-2015, 09:18 AM
CharlieLed's Avatar
CharlieLed
CharlieLed is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 7,863
Received 465 Likes on 301 Posts
I would look into some 3:25 gears...
 
  #4  
Old 10-10-2015, 10:37 AM
Gertie-The '49 F2's Avatar
Gertie-The '49 F2
Gertie-The '49 F2 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Columbus, IN
Posts: 545
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 1 Post
Wayne is correct, and Charlie has a good suggestion. Given that this is a light roadster, you could put some pretty steep gears in the rear to achieve lower engine revs. at 60, and yet still have good acceleration at low speeds.
 
  #5  
Old 10-10-2015, 10:38 AM
harleyjohn45's Avatar
harleyjohn45
harleyjohn45 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 52 Merc
The original 3 speed transmissions in all of these trucks were a 1:1 ratio in high gear. First gear was not synchronized. Only second and third.

Thanks for the information, I posted a picture in my avatar, the car weighs less than 2000 lbs, so my first gear is worthless. I've been using 2nd gear for startups. I've already added an Edelbrock 4 barrel and have a bubbas distributor on order, so I should have good power.
 
  #6  
Old 10-10-2015, 10:43 AM
harleyjohn45's Avatar
harleyjohn45
harleyjohn45 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by CharlieLed
I would look into some 3:25 gears...

Good Idea, I need some tall gears, will probably have to get some made. I've been told 3:70 is the tallest gear made for the 1950 ford rear end. I would hate to redo everything to get taller gears.
 
  #7  
Old 10-10-2015, 12:37 PM
tinman52's Avatar
tinman52
tinman52 is offline
Welder User

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: northwest MT
Posts: 5,261
Received 30 Likes on 19 Posts
How about swapping in an OD trans like a T-5? Yes it would be a bunch of work, but man they are nice behind a flat motor.....
 
  #8  
Old 10-10-2015, 04:03 PM
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
NumberDummy is offline
Ford Parts Specialist

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 88,826
Received 647 Likes on 542 Posts
Originally Posted by harleyjohn45
Good Idea, I need some tall gears, will probably have to get some made.

I've been told 3:70 is the tallest gear made for the 1950 ford rear end.
4209 Ring & Pinion, no see um 3.70-1.
 
Attached Images  
  #9  
Old 10-11-2015, 11:15 PM
harleyjohn45's Avatar
harleyjohn45
harleyjohn45 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tinman52
How about swapping in an OD trans like a T-5? Yes it would be a bunch of work, but man they are nice behind a flat motor.....

It would be nice. I have the emergency brake connected to the back of the transmission. I would be a job now.
 
  #10  
Old 10-12-2015, 08:59 AM
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
AXracer is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Durham NC
Posts: 15,844
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
It looks like it is critical that you discover exactly which year and model rear axle you actually have in the car. There were design changes between 49-52 with the 50 being in many ways an intermediate (ne orphan) design. Since Bill's chart does not show a 3.70 R&P being offered by Ford in the era, it would also be good to determine the actual ratio in your car before proceding.
 
  #11  
Old 10-12-2015, 11:36 AM
harleyjohn45's Avatar
harleyjohn45
harleyjohn45 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Smile

Originally Posted by NumberDummy
4209 Ring & Pinion, no see um 3.70-1.

Nice chart, thanks for the information. Now I have been exposed as to how little I know. Looking down the list, there appears to be a 3.30 to 1 That has a 33 ring and 10 pinion. If I could find one that would be perfect. I have other issues to deal with now and it may be a couple of months before I can get to it The best I can tell my tachometer is sitting at 2500 at 40mph.


Would you know a company that might could provide a set of gears?
 
  #12  
Old 10-12-2015, 12:02 PM
harleyjohn45's Avatar
harleyjohn45
harleyjohn45 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by AXracer
It looks like it is critical that you discover exactly which year and model rear axle you actually have in the car. There were design changes between 49-52 with the 50 being in many ways an intermediate (ne orphan) design. Since Bill's chart does not show a 3.70 R&P being offered by Ford in the era, it would also be good to determine the actual ratio in your car before proceding.

I agree. I pulled the rear out of a 1950 ford overdrive sedan in Alamogordo, NM. It appeared to be an original rear. After it was installed, I was told the OD transmission used a 4.10 ratio, so I contacted a friend in Florida and a acquired a ring and pinion set out of a 1951 ford sedan with automatic transmission and was told it was a 3.70. The 4.10 and 3.70 numbers appears no where on Bill's list The second set of gears are much taller, but still lower than I would like. I live in the mountains and with the current gearing I have no problem going over the mountains.
The motor and transmission came out of a 1953 Ford truck. I did not see the truck, but the motor is an 8BA. The transmission has an attached emergency brake that operates a brake band around the drive shaft. Not the best transmission set up, but looks super cool in a hot rod.
The car runs just fine the way it is, just does not have much top end. Maybe 50 or 55 MPH unless you want to wind the engine up.
 
  #13  
Old 10-12-2015, 03:12 PM
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
AXracer is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Durham NC
Posts: 15,844
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
Would need the tire diameter (for accuracy measure from ground to center of axle multiply x 2 to get the corrected rolling diameter) to calculate the gear ratio from RPM and speed. Bill (numberdummy) is plugged into the NOS dealer network can tell you if a NOS gear set is available and where.
 
  #14  
Old 10-12-2015, 05:09 PM
harleyjohn45's Avatar
harleyjohn45
harleyjohn45 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: florida
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
AX, the tire diameter is 12.5 inches from the floor to halfway of the axle. Tire size is 205-70 R15. from the floor to the top of the tire is 26 inches.


I suppose the rolling diameter is 25 inches.


The best I could read the tachometer at 30 MPH 1800 rpm, 40 MPH 2200 rpm, 50MPH was a little over 2600 rpm. Hard to read a tach going up hill or down hill, not much flat here.
 
  #15  
Old 10-12-2015, 09:56 PM
tinman52's Avatar
tinman52
tinman52 is offline
Welder User

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: northwest MT
Posts: 5,261
Received 30 Likes on 19 Posts
Just a suggestion, but if you went to a taller rear tire, say 28-29 inches it would lower your rpms considerably.
 


Quick Reply: Maybe some help



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.