please lend your opinion

  #16  
Old 09-21-2015, 07:01 AM
charliemccraney's Avatar
charliemccraney
charliemccraney is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
When you buy a disc brake kit, install it according to the instructions, and think you've made a great safety upgrade then have a failure that results in no brakes at all when it should have some brakes, yes, that really is a false sense of security.

I agree something must not be right or else it would have worked as it should have. The info is not out there to have any really good ideas what. I know of others who have experienced the exact same thing in older vehicles where a dual mc was not originally used.
 
  #17  
Old 09-21-2015, 07:30 AM
Tedster9's Avatar
Tedster9
Tedster9 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 19,311
Likes: 0
Received 66 Likes on 65 Posts
Dual master cylinders are SUPPOSED to be safer and they CAN be safer but they have to be setup right, and for my money should be tested to see if they work as advertised. Otherwise why bother?

When you're all done replacing a single pot for a dual, crack open a bleeder and then pump the pedal and see what happens. Might be surprised, and not in a good way. Push rod length and/or M/C stroke seems to be part of the problem. This is the false sense of security people talk about.

Don't misunderstand me, I'm not at all saying "don't do this"; but a lot of people have spent their time and money to modify the old school brake system (particularly because of younger folks that might be operating) but at the end of the day the dual would fail in exactly the same manner as a single pot - pedal to the floor and no brakes.
 
  #18  
Old 09-21-2015, 11:16 AM
HT32BSX115's Avatar
HT32BSX115
HT32BSX115 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upper Left Coast
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 0
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by Tedster9
When you're all done replacing a single pot for a dual, crack open a bleeder and then pump the pedal and see what happens. Might be surprised, and not in a good way. Push rod length and/or M/C stroke seems to be part of the problem.
This is of course the "key" to it all in addition to master cyl piston/bore diameter for both the front and back circuits. I know I'll have to do a little experimenting, but for my 55 F-600, since both the front and back brakes are similar to later years medium duty trucks that did have dual circuit systems, I can start with those master cyls and boosters.

They even used dual hydrovac boosters (1 for the front and 1 for the back) with a "standard" (dual) master cyl at some point in the 60's or 70's..............This is not my first choice.
 
  #19  
Old 09-21-2015, 03:31 PM
charliemccraney's Avatar
charliemccraney
charliemccraney is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,389
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 46 Posts
Pushrod length is definitely not the problem in my case. Stroke, which is directly related to the pedal ratio, could be. Do you know either the ideal stroke or pedal ratio or where to find that info?
 
  #20  
Old 09-21-2015, 09:03 PM
HT32BSX115's Avatar
HT32BSX115
HT32BSX115 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Upper Left Coast
Posts: 3,918
Likes: 0
Received 82 Likes on 49 Posts
Originally Posted by charliemccraney
Pushrod length is definitely not the problem in my case. Stroke, which is directly related to the pedal ratio, could be. Do you know either the ideal stroke or pedal ratio or where to find that info?
I don't know anyone that might do it for a medium duty 50-60's truck brake system.

They have done it for pretty much all the 1/2T and 3/4T (and maybe 1T) trucks because they are the vast majority of trucks out there.

Not really at all for the medium duty trucks. I'm planning to experiment.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xgkrx
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
11-29-2016 02:43 AM
carnut109
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
06-16-2011 07:44 AM
flipklos
Y-Block V8 (239, 272, 292, 312, 317, 341, 368)
13
09-26-2010 04:51 AM
DrBob762
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
08-10-2009 01:36 AM
se_911
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
26
09-26-2004 06:40 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: please lend your opinion



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.