What year switched to in tank high pressure fuel pump?
#1
What year switched to in tank high pressure fuel pump?
What year did they switch from the 2 fuel pump setup to the single in tank high pressure pump setup? What is the psi of the single pump setup? And was it available in rear tank only configuration? Doing some planning for the 4.6 swap in my 79 and I recall from my long gone 87 that the rear fuel tanks were the same in shape and mounting...
#4
I think the pumps would probably be all the same and the 300 just had a different fuel pressure regulator than the Windsors.
A 4.6 in a truck? That's only a 281... why not go to a 330 (5.4L) and gain some torque? 4.6 should have never been put in a truck... just not enough cubes there IMO. Of course Ford also put the 4.2 V6 in the same trucks that could be had with the 4.6/5.4 but I think they just did that to meet the idiotic CAFE standards.
Let's see some pics of your progress!
A 4.6 in a truck? That's only a 281... why not go to a 330 (5.4L) and gain some torque? 4.6 should have never been put in a truck... just not enough cubes there IMO. Of course Ford also put the 4.2 V6 in the same trucks that could be had with the 4.6/5.4 but I think they just did that to meet the idiotic CAFE standards.
Let's see some pics of your progress!
#6
I think the pumps would probably be all the same and the 300 just had a different fuel pressure regulator than the Windsors.
I agree about the pumps, Airtex #'s E2059MN front & E2064MN rear for all engines.
A 4.6 in a truck? That's only a 281... why not go to a 330 (5.4L) and gain some torque? 4.6 should have never been put in a truck... just not enough cubes there IMO
I'll disagree, gearing is the equalizer. I put 180K on my 2004 E250 4.6L 4.10 and could get 18 MPG all day. Put 110K on my 2008 E250 5.4L 3.73 and could never top 14 MPG. The 2004 was a much better van for a load.
I agree about the pumps, Airtex #'s E2059MN front & E2064MN rear for all engines.
A 4.6 in a truck? That's only a 281... why not go to a 330 (5.4L) and gain some torque? 4.6 should have never been put in a truck... just not enough cubes there IMO
I'll disagree, gearing is the equalizer. I put 180K on my 2004 E250 4.6L 4.10 and could get 18 MPG all day. Put 110K on my 2008 E250 5.4L 3.73 and could never top 14 MPG. The 2004 was a much better van for a load.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ron94150
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
09-14-2015 02:17 PM
tnguynaford
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
07-11-2015 05:58 PM
sckirklan
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
17
10-13-2008 04:00 PM
Duceswild
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
11
11-03-2007 06:23 AM