2017+ Super Duty The 2017+ Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty Pickup and Chassis Cab

2017 powerstroke hp/tq big numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-27-2015, 09:03 PM
Dakster's Avatar
Dakster
Dakster is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 9,838
Received 111 Likes on 37 Posts
Still wondering when Ford will come out with a diesel that gets 30 mpg when pulling like the Dodge's do - at least according to their owners... (sarcasm)

500/1000 is not that far off from what the 2015's make, so I don't see why that is an outlandish statement...
 
  #17  
Old 06-27-2015, 10:22 PM
ironman1977's Avatar
ironman1977
ironman1977 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am not sure, I will ask him when I talk to him in a few weeks
 
  #18  
Old 06-28-2015, 07:49 PM
HOWITTRO's Avatar
HOWITTRO
HOWITTRO is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2017 F450

Ironman
Thank you as I appreciate it. I am hoping the new 2017 will have a face lift as I don't want to buy a new truck and find out that the next year they have completely remodeled it I know its been awhile before Ford has remodeled the super duties and I hope its in the 2017 model year On another forum it was mentioned that they will start producing the 2017's in Feb 2016 as they apparently are now building the 2016's I believe. You would probably know for sure about this
Thanks again
Bob
 
  #19  
Old 06-28-2015, 07:52 PM
System's Avatar
System
System is offline
Prolocutor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western MA
Posts: 21,583
Received 1,183 Likes on 568 Posts
Originally Posted by HOWITTRO
Ironman
Thank you as I appreciate it. I am hoping the new 2017 will have a face lift as I don't want to buy a new truck and find out that the next year they have completely remodeled it I know its been awhile before Ford has remodeled the super duties and I hope its in the 2017 model year On another forum it was mentioned that they will start producing the 2017's in Feb 2016 as they apparently are now building the 2016's I believe. You would probably know for sure about this
Thanks again
Bob

The facelift has already been established... And it's less than attractive unless your a GM fan...

 
  #20  
Old 06-29-2015, 11:19 PM
Bluovlnut's Avatar
Bluovlnut
Bluovlnut is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm probably going to get myself in trouble here. As much as I love my '11 450 KR and am a die hard Ford guy, I don't always think it's the best looking when compared to a decked out Denali or Ram. Having said that I have never towed with either of the other two, drove a Ram for about 4 hours and could not wait to get out because of the uncomfortable seat (for me anyways)
 
  #21  
Old 06-30-2015, 05:38 PM
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Frantz is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Lewisberry, Penn
Posts: 2,775
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
The 6.7 in the 650/750 is actually detuned quite a bit for longevity. The light duty trucks will likely see 1000tq but that's marketing more than practicality. If you look at other true medium duty trucks, Ford's numbers stack up decent.
 
  #22  
Old 06-30-2015, 06:02 PM
heymrdj's Avatar
heymrdj
heymrdj is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Frantz
The 6.7 in the 650/750 is actually detuned quite a bit for longevity. The light duty trucks will likely see 1000tq but that's marketing more than practicality. If you look at other true medium duty trucks, Ford's numbers stack up decent.
Not really. The big 3 have always lacked in power in this category.

Current 650 (not upcoming) - 325 @ 2300 RPM | 750 lb-ft @ 1800 RPM Cummins ISB

Kenworth T270 Class 6 - Up to PX-9 Paccar engine at 380HP and 1,250 lb-ft @ 1,400 RPM

Freightliner M2 106 Class 6 - Cummins ISL9 380HP and 1,300 lb-ft.

International Durastar Class 6 - International N9 engine 330HP and 950 lb-ft.

Only weaker Class 6 really is Hino (260HP, 660 lb-ft). But for the most part the big 3's class 6's have been weak on power.
 
  #23  
Old 06-30-2015, 06:44 PM
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Frantz is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Lewisberry, Penn
Posts: 2,775
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
The big truck companies do have some more powerful motors that they use in their class 8s, and then they can put them in the medium trucks as well... But if you compare standard power to the class then Ford is pretty competitive. As you probably know, with big trucks it's not about "Max" numbers, its building the right truck to the job. For an example, Kensworth uses their PX7 in 5,6,7 class trucks, and it's numbers are peaked at 360/800. Most class 6 trucks would likely use this, which makes Ford a direct competitor for most users.
 
  #24  
Old 06-30-2015, 06:58 PM
heymrdj's Avatar
heymrdj
heymrdj is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The companies I worked with found the main issues with the big 3 engines was shop time. They were always over worked even while well within limits. Rebuilds were not as easy, or outright impossible. The trucks were clapping out at 120K miles instead of 400K plus.
 
  #25  
Old 07-01-2015, 05:58 AM
redford's Avatar
redford
redford is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Stephensville WI
Posts: 23,060
Received 1,550 Likes on 905 Posts
Originally Posted by Frantz
The 6.7 in the 650/750 is actually detuned quite a bit for longevity. The light duty trucks will likely see 1000tq but that's marketing more than practicality. If you look at other true medium duty trucks, Ford's numbers stack up decent.
Not true. The Ford engineers have stated that it is the same engine, but trucks over a certain GVWR are rated differently. You don't rate them on peak HP and torque, you instead rate them at specific RPM values.
 
  #26  
Old 07-01-2015, 06:02 AM
System's Avatar
System
System is offline
Prolocutor
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western MA
Posts: 21,583
Received 1,183 Likes on 568 Posts
Originally Posted by redford
Not true. The Ford engineers have stated that it is the same engine, but trucks over a certain GVWR are rated differently. You don't rate them on peak HP and torque, you instead rate them at specific RPM values.
Stuart, I've never heard of this on the 6.7. I've seen it confirmed many times for the 6.2 between the SD and F150 but never the 6.7. Do you have a link or something to verify?
 
  #27  
Old 07-01-2015, 06:08 AM
Gicknordon's Avatar
Gicknordon
Gicknordon is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Birdsboro PA
Posts: 1,885
Received 71 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by redford
Not true. The Ford engineers have stated that it is the same engine, but trucks over a certain GVWR are rated differently. You don't rate them on peak HP and torque, you instead rate them at specific RPM values.
They do use a different turbo on the chassis cab trucks though.
 
  #28  
Old 07-01-2015, 06:57 AM
Mr. Mcbeevee's Avatar
Mr. Mcbeevee
Mr. Mcbeevee is offline
Elder User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 551
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by redford
Not true. The Ford engineers have stated that it is the same engine, but trucks over a certain GVWR are rated differently. You don't rate them on peak HP and torque, you instead rate them at specific RPM values.
You are thinking gas engines. In diesel the cab and chassis are a single turbo where the pickups are dual. They pickups have significantly more hp and TQ than their c and c counter parts.
 
  #29  
Old 07-01-2015, 08:39 AM
heymrdj's Avatar
heymrdj
heymrdj is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,079
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by redford
Not true. The Ford engineers have stated that it is the same engine, but trucks over a certain GVWR are rated differently. You don't rate them on peak HP and torque, you instead rate them at specific RPM values.
Originally Posted by Karl4Cat
Stuart, I've never heard of this on the 6.7. I've seen it confirmed many times for the 6.2 between the SD and F150 but never the 6.7. Do you have a link or something to verify?
Originally Posted by Gicknordon
They do use a different turbo on the chassis cab trucks though.
Originally Posted by Mr. Mcbeevee
You are thinking gas engines. In diesel the cab and chassis are a single turbo where the pickups are dual. They pickups have significantly more hp and TQ than their c and c counter parts.
According to the Q/A they are quite different engines: 2015 Super Duty Engineers Q&A: Part 3 - Ford-Trucks.com
 
  #30  
Old 07-02-2015, 06:36 PM
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz
Frantz is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Lewisberry, Penn
Posts: 2,775
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
The companies I worked with found the main issues with the big 3 engines was shop time. They were always over worked even while well within limits. Rebuilds were not as easy, or outright impossible. The trucks were clapping out at 120K miles instead of 400K plus.
Ford heard ya on that. 5 year, 250k warranty is standard with the 6.7 med duty. While I'm not a big fan of factory warranties, Ford has addressed the public concern with the previous motors they fielded.
 


Quick Reply: 2017 powerstroke hp/tq big numbers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:04 PM.