EcoBoost (all engine sizes) 3.5L Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6, 2.7 Twin Turbo EcoBoost V6, 2.3l/2.0L I4 EcoBoost Engines

So they stuck them in the new GT and Raptor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-12-2015, 10:23 PM
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
351Cleveland C4 is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Edge of the Desert
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 0
Received 137 Likes on 121 Posts
So they stuck them in the new GT and Raptor

I guess ford is really playing the EcoBoost card.

The new 2017 F-150 raptor and the new 2017 GT both have the 3.5 engine. The one for the GT making over 600hp. Raptor spec is said to be "more powerful than previous 6.2 truck" which means it has over 411hp.


What do you guys think?

I say it's pretty cool in both applications, although I think the new 5.2 flat-plane v8 might have worked better for the GT.
 
  #2  
Old 01-12-2015, 11:37 PM
SDDL-UP's Avatar
SDDL-UP
SDDL-UP is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 918
Received 29 Likes on 23 Posts
It may work in the new GT IF Ford races it's!!!

If they don't race it - it's just nice eye candy. I agree that V8's would have been better choices in BOTH platforms, but Ford is so blinded pushing the EcoBoost they aren't making smart decisions IMO. Remember when Chrysler had turbo 4-bangers in everything? Seemed like a good idea at the time didn't it?! Now where are they...?

Ford is putting all their eggs in the EcoBasket and that's not smart IMO! They NEED to keep the V8's around!!!
 
  #3  
Old 01-13-2015, 05:10 AM
King Ranch's Avatar
King Ranch
King Ranch is offline
Laughing Gas

Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They are not the 3.5 that we have now though. Article says all new V6 Ecoboost.
 
  #4  
Old 01-13-2015, 03:45 PM
FalcoDog's Avatar
FalcoDog
FalcoDog is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Up State NY
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SDDL-UP
It may work in the new GT IF Ford races it's!!!

If they don't race it - it's just nice eye candy. I agree that V8's would have been better choices in BOTH platforms, but Ford is so blinded pushing the EcoBoost they aren't making smart decisions IMO. Remember when Chrysler had turbo 4-bangers in everything? Seemed like a good idea at the time didn't it?! Now where are they...?

Ford is putting all their eggs in the EcoBasket and that's not smart IMO! They NEED to keep the V8's around!!!




It's not just a Ford thing. VAG, BMW and MB are also heavily invested in small turbos and they are putting them in everything they build.

I agree Ford should keep the V8 and they probably will in some fashion for the near future. But comparing the EcoBoost to the 2.2L turbo Chrysler engine is like comparing running shoes to slippers.
 
  #5  
Old 01-13-2015, 04:44 PM
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
351Cleveland C4 is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Edge of the Desert
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 0
Received 137 Likes on 121 Posts
A lot of people are crying about the GT having a V6. The only thing I believe is that ford wouldn't have done it if it didn't outperform the previous model by 20-30%, which means it's should just flat out scoot!

As far as the raptor goes, people are saying the same thing, "should've put a V8 in it!" I think these people are only seeing "V6" and don't have any idea what the EcoBoost really is. I say the EcoBoost was a good choice, make that a great choice, for the truck considering its wide spread success in the regular f-150s. And this one is said to be even more powerful. But I think they would sell even more trucks if there was a optional V8.
 
  #6  
Old 01-13-2015, 07:20 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,065
Received 437 Likes on 322 Posts
After owning an ecoboost, I wouldn't buy a naturally aspirated V8 in any future truck if I had a choice.

I know there are a lot of vocal naysayers on this site, but I think take rate of the EcoBoost is proving to be pretty high, and that's the data ford is using. They aren't acting "blindly" at all.
 
  #7  
Old 01-13-2015, 07:24 PM
King Ranch's Avatar
King Ranch
King Ranch is offline
Laughing Gas

Join Date: May 2003
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by seventyseven250
After owning an ecoboost, I wouldn't buy a naturally aspirated V8 in any future truck if I had a choice.

I know there are a lot of vocal naysayers on this site, but I think take rate of the EcoBoost is proving to be pretty high, and that's the data ford is using. They aren't acting "blindly" at all.
X2 love the ecoboost, just got my 2nd one.
 
  #8  
Old 01-15-2015, 05:10 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,153
Received 1,221 Likes on 803 Posts
The Raptor is a specialty truck and while it appeals to all enthusiasts, there's a limited number of people that will actually buy one. It makes perfect sense. The 3.5L won't get any worse MPG's than the 6.2L that it replaces and it's producing more power than ever.

The only downside here is the lack of that beautiful beastly V-8 noise. Quite frankly, I love the smooth quiet power that mine makes.
 
  #9  
Old 01-16-2015, 03:38 AM
Frdtrkrul's Avatar
Frdtrkrul
Frdtrkrul is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Utica, Nebraska
Posts: 1,244
Received 29 Likes on 20 Posts
From what I've read the reason for the EcoBoost going into the GT is they changed regulations in the European racing circuits think mostly at the famous Circuit de la Sarthe in Le Mans, France. No engine larger than 5.5L for naturally aspirated. No engine larger than 4.0L for forced induction.

I'm not sure about the EcoBoost in the GT but according to the regulations it cannot have Variable Valve Timing.

Page 14 for engine size.

http://www.24h-lemans.com/wpphpFichi...ons-lm-gte.pdf

Sounds of the new GT beast! This is what the Ford GT will sound like at Le Mans

If that does not scream EcoBeast then I have no idea what does!
 
  #10  
Old 01-18-2015, 10:25 PM
efx4's Avatar
efx4
efx4 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,058
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I painted a 2014 Tuxedo Black Raptor at my work recently and it had 13.2 mpg average on the dash. I'm sure the Ecoboost motor in a 500 pound less truck with the new 10 speed transmission should make better mpg.
 
  #11  
Old 01-18-2015, 11:01 PM
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
351Cleveland C4 is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Edge of the Desert
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 0
Received 137 Likes on 121 Posts
That's another thing...

WHY THE HELL DOES IT HAVE 10 GEARS?!?!?!? 6 wasn't enough?

It better have a WIDE range and the ability to skip gears. I'm talking like a 5:1 first gear and a 0.50:1 overdrive. If it doesn't then it's just a waste to have it shifting every two seconds.
 
  #12  
Old 01-18-2015, 11:20 PM
Frdtrkrul's Avatar
Frdtrkrul
Frdtrkrul is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Utica, Nebraska
Posts: 1,244
Received 29 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by 351Cleveland C4
That's another thing...

WHY THE HELL DOES IT HAVE 10 GEARS?!?!?!? 6 wasn't enough?

It better have a WIDE range and the ability to skip gears. I'm talking like a 5:1 first gear and a 0.50:1 overdrive. If it doesn't then it's just a waste to have it shifting every two seconds.
I had that discussion with someone else in the 2015+ F150 section. I too would like a 5:1 or lower first with a double OD. He was saying that they won;t go that low and would probably be around a 4.71:1 with a triple OD but nothing higher than a 0.61:1. I think they could spread them from a 5:1 to a 0.55:1 without a compromise. Since this new 10 speed is going to be used in what seems like all the trucks (including the Chevy Twins) then its going to make sense to have a low gear.

The ones who'll really benefit from a very low granny are those who off road and the ones who tow a lot.
 
  #13  
Old 01-18-2015, 11:46 PM
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
351Cleveland C4 is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Edge of the Desert
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 0
Received 137 Likes on 121 Posts
^ exactly. Then with high/low range t-case, you have essentially 20 gears.
 
  #14  
Old 01-19-2015, 12:00 PM
mackintire's Avatar
mackintire
mackintire is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Frdtrkrul
I had that discussion with someone else in the 2015+ F150 section. I too would like a 5:1 or lower first with a double OD. He was saying that they won;t go that low and would probably be around a 4.71:1 with a triple OD but nothing higher than a 0.61:1. I think they could spread them from a 5:1 to a 0.55:1 without a compromise. Since this new 10 speed is going to be used in what seems like all the trucks (including the Chevy Twins) then its going to make sense to have a low gear.

The ones who'll really benefit from a very low granny are those who off road and the ones who tow a lot.

Gearing will settle around 3:55 ratio

First will be around 4: 90 with the final overdrive being close to 0.50


The 10 speed is like having a 4:10 geared truck and a 3:23 geared truck at the same time. One ring gear option makes building the trucks easier.

Yes it will have the ability to skip gears, the 6 speed will do that now if you put it to the floor at 40MPH. It'll shift straight from 4th gear to 2nd.


I'm also betting that the 10 speed will have a torque converter with a low stall and extremely fast lockup. It's probably run closer like a manual with the torque converter there to allow slippage. Gives you higher efficiency, but you need more gears to make it work that way. All the new mazda's with skyactive powertrains already work this way. Helped Mazda give their cars another 1-2 MPG.
 
  #15  
Old 01-19-2015, 12:11 PM
351Cleveland C4's Avatar
351Cleveland C4
351Cleveland C4 is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: On the Edge of the Desert
Posts: 8,601
Likes: 0
Received 137 Likes on 121 Posts
Is it a ford built trans? Or is it being outsourced?
 


Quick Reply: So they stuck them in the new GT and Raptor



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.