2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

Ecoboost vs diesel half tons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 12-24-2014, 12:48 AM
j.grif's Avatar
j.grif
j.grif is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: plymouth mi
Posts: 730
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger1980
Next time you fill up, go to the reefer pump. Why pay road tax if you don't have to?
In Michigan, the current fine is 200.00 dollars if you get pulled over and inspected by motor carrier division, Mi is proposing that the fine go to 1000.00 dollars, Illinois has a significant fine also, its not likely that you would be pulled over and inspected in a pickup truck, but many times the people that are pulled over for this are reported by others in the know about someone using non taxed fuel on highway, so are they looking, probably not unless someone gives them a heads up, not worth the possible trouble. Michigan Senate approves plan to double fuel tax rates
 
  #32  
Old 12-24-2014, 06:48 AM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by BIGRED 7.3L
I saw a guy in a new GM truck in Indy a few years ago trying to drain gas out of his diesel. We were at a BP station. BP puts green pump handle covers on their gas pumps. I have since read a few posts in both the 7.3L forum as well as the VW TDI forums where the unassuming driver pumped the wrong fuel. Survivable in an old school diesel. Death in a new school diesel.

I have always been extremly concerned with this possible "lapse" and ensured I was the only one who every filled up my Passat TDI or OBS 7.3L. And even then, I had a process I went throught to triple check which handle I had in my hand before I squeezed the trigger.

Is it an ignorant think to do? Heck yes. Does stuff happen? Heck yes.
Of course it does, we've seen a few cases of misfueling in the 6.7L forum. But that can happen regardless of what you drive, and for many years people have done just fine with diesel cars. They've dealt with the cold weather, water separators, and other things and still choose to buy them.

Yes you have more fuel-related issues to deal with than a gas engine, but it's certainly not rocket science. I find lots of pickup truck owners over-think it and do far more than is necessary. They overdo things like turbo cool down, water separator maintenance, and cold weather additive. I used to be a truck driver, and I've never seen a professional driver fall prey to half the hysteria that I see in diesel pickup forums.

I'm confident use as a daily driver isn't going to adversely affect things for one either. The engines are sized and designed for the job they will be performing, and you can be sure a 3.0L engine will get the workout it needs pushing 5,000 lbs of pickup truck around the block.
 
  #33  
Old 12-24-2014, 10:40 AM
parkland's Avatar
parkland
parkland is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
There are likely lots of parts that will never hit 300,000 miles on those little diesels.
I suspect the following parts will die before 300,000...

Injectors and or fuel pump
DPF
EGR coolers / valve
 
  #34  
Old 12-24-2014, 11:14 AM
BIGRED 7.3L's Avatar
BIGRED 7.3L
BIGRED 7.3L is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
Of course it does, we've seen a few cases of misfueling in the 6.7L forum. But that can happen regardless of what you drive, and for many years people have done just fine with diesel cars. They've dealt with the cold weather, water separators, and other things and still choose to buy them.

Yes you have more fuel-related issues to deal with than a gas engine, but it's certainly not rocket science. I find lots of pickup truck owners over-think it and do far more than is necessary. They overdo things like turbo cool down, water separator maintenance, and cold weather additive. I used to be a truck driver, and I've never seen a professional driver fall prey to half the hysteria that I see in diesel pickup forums.

I'm confident use as a daily driver isn't going to adversely affect things for one either. The engines are sized and designed for the job they will be performing, and you can be sure a 3.0L engine will get the workout it needs pushing 5,000 lbs of pickup truck around the block.
No argument from me at all. I have been around diesel all my life. I bought my Passat TDI for the MPG and was very satisfied. Just not satisfied with being in a car. The difference between actual gas MPG and diesel MPG in the Passat TDI made it logical and covered the cost of diesel and then some.

Based strictly on the MPG benifit argument; Dodge Eco MPG does not cover the cost of diesel vs gas F150. In my calculator's opinion anyway...
 
  #35  
Old 12-24-2014, 02:02 PM
wheelerfreak's Avatar
wheelerfreak
wheelerfreak is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 325
Received 97 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by parkland
There are likely lots of parts that will never hit 300,000 miles on those little diesels.
I suspect the following parts will die before 300,000...

Injectors and or fuel pump
DPF
EGR coolers / valve
Those same parts would also fail on a "big" diesel too. It's not like the 6.0 and 6.4 didn't have those issues and I'm sure the 6.7's as they age will too.
 
  #36  
Old 12-24-2014, 02:20 PM
FishOnOne's Avatar
FishOnOne
FishOnOne is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The Great State of Texas
Posts: 6,127
Received 1,447 Likes on 893 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
You say that like there haven't been diesel cars around for decades. If the folks who buy a Golf TDI can find the right nozzle I'm sure those who buy an EcoDiesel Ram can figure it out. The "special needs " just aren't that special IMHO.
Perhaps that's why the Golf TDI's had so many CP4.1 fuel pump failures. Gas is not forgiving on these pumps.


BTW... The Eco Diesel has a CP4.2 pump and a single fuel filter.
 
  #37  
Old 12-24-2014, 02:30 PM
Ranger1980's Avatar
Ranger1980
Ranger1980 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by j.grif
In Michigan, the current fine is 200.00 dollars if you get pulled over and inspected by motor carrier division, Mi is proposing that the fine go to 1000.00 dollars, Illinois has a significant fine also, its not likely that you would be pulled over and inspected in a pickup truck, but many times the people that are pulled over for this are reported by others in the know about someone using non taxed fuel on highway, so are they looking, probably not unless someone gives them a heads up, not worth the possible trouble. Michigan Senate approves plan to double fuel tax rates
Annnnnnd,all that would be relevant if I was talking about his truck. However
, the poster was talking about his kubota tractor. If fuel purchased is not used on road, you are eligible for road taxes to be refunded come tax time. Or, buy from the off road pump. Gasolin has the same deal as well. When I owned a lawn company, my fuel cost was cut by a third come tax time.
 
  #38  
Old 12-24-2014, 02:37 PM
Ranger1980's Avatar
Ranger1980
Ranger1980 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by super 6.8
Modern gas engines will easily go 300k too.
No. They won't. Not at a cos per mile comparison.
 
  #39  
Old 12-24-2014, 02:45 PM
Tom's Avatar
Tom
Tom is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Isanti, MN
Posts: 25,428
Received 672 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger1980
No. They won't. Not at a cos per mile comparison.
I'm sure that's possible under the right conditions, but that's not always the case. Around here gas is about $1.00/gal less than diesel, and a tank of bad fuel will cost you $10,000+ in a diesel-powered pickup. I could point out more than a few tales of woe from diesel owners facing mega-dollar repair bills.

The most recent one was a new engine at 115,000 miles for nearly $15K. What would you say his cost per mile is?
 
  #40  
Old 12-24-2014, 02:54 PM
Ranger1980's Avatar
Ranger1980
Ranger1980 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom
I'm sure that's possible under the right conditions, but that's not always the case. Around here gas is about $1.00/gal less than diesel, and a tank of bad fuel will cost you $10,000+ in a diesel-powered pickup. I could point out more than a few tales of woe from diesel owners facing mega-dollar repair bills.

The most recent one was a new engine at 115,000 miles for nearly $15K. What would you say his cost per mile is?
Operator error cannot be figured as a cost per mile. Fleets usually have one pump. A fleet expects x amount of miles over y miles at z per mile. Diesel still wins that equasion. Mores when you buy in bulk fuels. As a fleet does. A small fuel efficient truck with a diesel would keep ford in commercial and .gov contracts alone.
 
  #41  
Old 12-24-2014, 04:49 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,065
Received 437 Likes on 322 Posts
A while back, I tried to get a thread going discussing CNG, LNG and Propane (LPG). Didn't get much traction. Maybe because it was in the alternative fuels sub-forum.

Anyway, if anyone wants to chime in over there:
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...iscussion.html

I spent some time looking at both CNG and LNG in a bi-fuel setup on diesel engines in drilling rigs, and I think it's a technology that's going to be very widespread relatively soon.
 
  #42  
Old 12-24-2014, 04:51 PM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,065
Received 437 Likes on 322 Posts
Originally Posted by Ranger1980
A small fuel efficient truck with a diesel would keep ford in commercial and .gov contracts alone.
If that's true, we'll see the results as fleets switch to Ram EcoDiesel in large numbers. My guess is that they'll be pretty slow to do this.
 
  #43  
Old 12-24-2014, 04:56 PM
senix's Avatar
senix
senix is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 36,591
Received 1,415 Likes on 1,010 Posts
Originally Posted by seventyseven250
If that's true, we'll see the results as fleets switch to Ram EcoDiesel in large numbers. My guess is that they'll be pretty slow to do this.


They won't switch because there is no real payload capabilities.
 
  #44  
Old 12-28-2014, 06:19 PM
ravens fan's Avatar
ravens fan
ravens fan is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Curwensville,PA
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think in trucks it all comes down how much you are going to be hauling. You can't beat the torque of a diesel for hauling heavy loads and still getting decent mileage. However for a daily driver truck i think gas makes more sense in a half ton.

I would also add that diesel cars make a lot more sense than gas cars. My TDI gets 46-50 mpg and doesn't cost hardly anything to maintain. Even with the higher cost of diesel you still come out ahead of most any gas cars.
 
  #45  
Old 12-28-2014, 06:40 PM
parkland's Avatar
parkland
parkland is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,267
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ravens fan
My TDI gets 46-50 mpg and doesn't cost hardly anything to maintain. Even with the higher cost of diesel you still come out ahead of most any gas cars.
Everyone always praises the VW TDI for fuel economy, but it is the car, not the engine, that is the reason for the fuel mileage it gets.
The guys with the gas VW cars get crazy good MPG too, not as much as the diesel, but really good for the car.
 


Quick Reply: Ecoboost vs diesel half tons



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 AM.