Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

351w vs 360/390

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 12-09-2014, 12:24 PM
steve33444's Avatar
steve33444
steve33444 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: smock pa
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bbf385
A 460 is a bigger engine and came stock in 80-96/7 trucks. It fits with room to spare, so I'd wager a 390 would fit no problem.
I'd go with a 460, though. A BB in a truck =
Id love to if I could find one and build it and not have it kill me on gas mileage
 
  #17  
Old 12-09-2014, 12:26 PM
steve33444's Avatar
steve33444
steve33444 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: smock pa
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by f100beatertruck
For me it seemed like the better way to go. I only needed a cast crank and hyper eutectic pistons so the prices were much better than the 408 kits. Now when you add forged pistons the prices get closer and if you add a forged crank it's really not that different, but for an inexpensive stroker the 393 seems like the hot ticket. Just watch your compression ratio. Summit Racing has a calculator. I went with around 9.5:1, but I'm trying to build kind of a hot motor. For more of a street motor you might want to go around 9:1 - 9.25:1
Thanks.. if I stroke it do you think it would get alot worse gas mileage than it would stock?
 
  #18  
Old 12-09-2014, 01:23 PM
f100beatertruck's Avatar
f100beatertruck
f100beatertruck is offline
Cargo Master

Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Parkesburg PA
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by bbf385
A 460 is a bigger engine and came stock in 80-96/7 trucks. It fits with room to spare, so I'd wager a 390 would fit no problem.
I'd go with a 460, though. A BB in a truck =
Oh it'll physically fit, but you'll need a rear sump pan, custom motor mounts, exhaust will have to be thought out, a transmission from an FE truck, you'll have to figure out the power steering because there are no mounts for the 80 and up pump to fit an FE, you'll need a carb and DSII ignition setup, etc...

And it would be no way even close to emissions legal.

An FE powered truck would be cool, but with all the Windsor parts available and it being a direct bolt-in... Kind of a no brainer IMO.

I'd imagine gas mileage to be similar, probably a little lower, but not as bad as a 460.
 
  #19  
Old 12-09-2014, 01:57 PM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,037
Received 121 Likes on 102 Posts
I'd build a 460 before I spent all that money on a stroker build. Stroker builds are great for saving space and weight, but neither are really an issue in these trucks. The 460 will be muuuch cheaper, and has way better heads on it that can support lots of power with porting and milling for compression. Under normal driving conditions, it'll be just the same as a big cube stroked 351 as far as fuel guzzling.

If I were to do mine all over it'd be 460...I hate that I can't run a zf6, and with minor alterations the 7.3 zf6 can bolt up to a 460.

Build a 460, and buy yourself some other Xmas presents. Or use money saved to buy a zf6.
 
  #20  
Old 12-09-2014, 03:47 PM
Ddaybc's Avatar
Ddaybc
Ddaybc is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Vernon, BC
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I could be wrong but I think the 360 and the 460 get about the same gas mileage. About 8 to 10, maybe 12 if you are reeeaaaalllllly careful! That's what my 360 got and it never saw the high side of 10 From what I've read on FTE a 460 does about the same. Some, a bit more, some a bit less. So if you can live with that then save your money and build a 460 as it will be cheaper in the long run.

If you want better mileage than the 360/460 the same comparison, more or less, applies to the 390 and the 351W. The 351W will get a bit better gas mileage than a 390 but they are close enough. The 351W will be cheaper to build and run. I've heard of people say they get 18 mpg with a 390. I've even heard of one claim of 21 mpg but I don't believe it. Mileage in the 14 or 15 mpg range is more realistic. Many report that or slightly better with the 351W too.

Good luck with whatever you decide to do.
 
  #21  
Old 12-09-2014, 07:50 PM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
360s and 39-s are both boat anchors. The 428 though can be made to REALLY run.

I would just stick with your 351W and put a cam, set of heads and decent headers on it. You will be AMAZED what it will do
 
  #22  
Old 12-09-2014, 08:31 PM
steve33444's Avatar
steve33444
steve33444 is offline
Elder User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: smock pa
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Diesel_Brad
360s and 39-s are both boat anchors. The 428 though can be made to REALLY run.

I would just stick with your 351W and put a cam, set of heads and decent headers on it. You will be AMAZED what it will do
How would u think a 351w with a set of GT40 heads and an xtreme energy 256H cam work?
 
  #23  
Old 12-09-2014, 11:36 PM
bbf385's Avatar
bbf385
bbf385 is online now
More Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by '89F2urd
and with minor alterations the 7.3 zf6 can bolt up to a 460.
Really? My interest is piqued.
 
  #24  
Old 12-10-2014, 09:51 AM
'89F2urd's Avatar
'89F2urd
'89F2urd is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 5,037
Received 121 Likes on 102 Posts
Originally Posted by bbf385
Really? My interest is piqued.
NV5600 bolts right up with an adapter from places like advanced adapters, I should have said that first. The nv 56 is a great trans, but I'm growing weary of them as more time goes by, *many* rebuilt trans are pure junk...ever since they went out of business it's all been china parts flooding the market with who knows who rebuilding them. All of mine are factory built, and as those become more scarce I'll be resorting to other transmissions. Mainly zf6 in applications where they can physically fit.....

I can't attest to what exactly it takes to mate the 7.3 zf6 to a 460, because I haven't done it personally, but i know it's been done. I've, however, seen it both personally and browsing the net. No cutting of bell housings and welding new ones, it's a matter of building/grafting bracketry and getting the right flywheel/starter combo. I'll be looking into it more for myself and if the cost is right I may build a 460 just to run a zf6. In the unlikely event I find a factory nv 56 in the meantime that isn't beaten to death or seller is askin ridiculous amounts I'll be mating that to my 351 and continuing to use it. I can let you know what I come up with as for the zf6 requirements if you are interested.
 
  #25  
Old 12-10-2014, 10:37 AM
bbf385's Avatar
bbf385
bbf385 is online now
More Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by '89F2urd
I can let you know what I come up with as for the zf6 requirements if you are interested.
I am definitely interested.
 
  #26  
Old 12-10-2014, 12:27 PM
Diesel_Brad's Avatar
Diesel_Brad
Diesel_Brad is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Gilbert, PA
Posts: 21,431
Received 59 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by bbf385
Really? My interest is piqued.
just like a diesel ZF5 can be adapted to a 385 series engine. Just hope you are prepared to spend $1500 plus on a ZF6
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
68 f250
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
27
10-21-2020 09:27 AM
raven3
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
30
07-03-2014 07:27 PM
Big block 68
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
07-31-2012 08:01 PM
stevenjakeryan
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
02-27-2011 08:48 PM
popeye69
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
4
08-13-2003 01:05 PM



Quick Reply: 351w vs 360/390



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 PM.