Power Ratings on 3.5 EcoBoost? - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



2015+ F150 Discuss the 2015 Ford F150
Presented by the all-new Yokohama
Presented by the all-new Yokohama

Power Ratings on 3.5 EcoBoost?

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-25-2014, 10:51 AM
johnkn johnkn is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 388
johnkn is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Power Ratings on 3.5 EcoBoost?

I posted this on the Expedition side as well. I was ready to pull the trigger on another Expedition this Fall. The Ford site shows the 2015 Expedition having the same power ratings as the current F150 (365/420). BUT, the Lincoln Navigator site shows it's rated at 380/460! Wow, big difference. What is the 2015 F150 3.5EB going to be rated at? I'd have to believe that at some point all 3 would normalize at the same power ratings. Not sure I'd even buy the 2015 now knowing at there could quickly be an increase.... always something...

Also, are there any different hard parts on the Navigator, or just a different tune?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2014, 12:22 PM
2015er 2015er is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 75
2015er is starting off with a positive reputation.
Anxious to see these numbers as well as the MPG figures for both the 2.7 and the 3.5.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-25-2014, 07:42 PM
tvsjr tvsjr is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,295
tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.tvsjr has a great reputation on FTE.
Many of the Lincolns have required premium fuel in the past... I wonder if this one will as well. That could explain the difference.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-25-2014, 08:47 PM
johnkn johnkn is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 388
johnkn is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The Lincoln site doesn't indicate fuel type, Edmunds says regular unleaded.

40 ft/lbs is a big jump, I have to believe it's all tune. I'll be pissed if I drop $60k+ on another Expedition this fall only to +15/40 available mid model year or something.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My Only Concern! 3.73 Gas Towing!! RAAADRZ 1999 to 2016 Super Duty 44 03-17-2017 07:12 PM
Sterling 10.5 rear axle rating question troverman 1999 to 2016 Super Duty 13 12-16-2014 07:04 AM
2015 Navigator EcoBoost has +15hp and +40ft/lbs more than F150 johnkn 2015+ F150 33 10-01-2014 01:47 AM
FYI - 2015 Ford Expedition to get 5.0 liter "Coyote" V-8 and 10-speed auto LocDoc 2015 + Expedition & Navigator 45 04-22-2014 08:09 AM
Octane NAvi vs Expedition Diverdom 1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator 21 06-04-2010 08:21 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.


 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
Question Title:
Description:
Your question will be posted in: