Question of the Week: Should Ford have kept the 6.2L V8 for the 2015 F150? - Page 3 - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



2015+ F150 Discuss the 2015 Ford F150

View Poll Results: Should Ford Have Kept the 6.2L V8 for the 2015 F150?
Yes, it should be able across the lineup. 66 58.41%
Yes, but only on high end models like in 2014 10 8.85%
No, it isnt needed and the previous take rate proves that. 37 32.74%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll

Question of the Week: Should Ford have kept the 6.2L V8 for the 2015 F150?

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old 09-10-2014, 01:19 AM
AlaskanEx's Avatar
AlaskanEx AlaskanEx is online now
Post Fiend
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Anchorage Alaska
Posts: 12,325
AlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputationAlaskanEx has a superb reputation
Yes it should be an option. I don't care as I already got my 6.2 F-150 and you will have to pry it from my cold dead hands.

I drove all the current engine offerings and it's the only one that really puts that smile on my face.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 09-10-2014, 05:04 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins tseekins is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 26,100
tseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputationtseekins has a superb reputation
I saw a RAM commercial last night touting the 2015 Hemi 5.7L with 395 HP and up to 22 MPG's. It can be done with some technology but the 6.2L wasn't the answer.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 09-12-2014, 10:08 AM
RigTrash601's Avatar
RigTrash601 RigTrash601 is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Hattiesburg, Ms.
Posts: 4,632
RigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputationRigTrash601 has a superb reputation
I just feel Ford is making a blunder not offering the engine in at least a limited production truck, even in this day and age, there are still folks that purchase a vehicle for the way it makes them feel, and driving experience and not MPG stats, etc.
I have no doubt Ford trucks will remain on top, but I feel it will be a smaller margin, the above mentioned consumer will swap to a Ram or a GM with 6.2L.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 09-15-2014, 06:32 PM
Builtihtuff Builtihtuff is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 324
Builtihtuff is starting off with a positive reputation.
Hmm

i say keep the 6.2L i regret i was not allowed to factory order my 2014

i love the 5.0L dont get me wrong it owns my 1995 5.Slow but i want to know that if i Step on her there is no question im flying... people who buy a 6.2 need it to haul heavy or haul a$$ why else would u buy one its not a cruise the slow shopping mall scene kinda engine...

as for ford i love ford and will continue to buy one i just wish i had a 6.2L but hey we cant win them all right...

6.2L Hennessy tuned - just a suggestion


Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-11-2014, 04:32 PM
640 CI Aluminum FORD 640 CI Aluminum FORD is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,167
640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.640 CI Aluminum FORD has a great reputation on FTE.
I voted yes.

I agree with those who state it should be an option at the very least.

With a few simple upgrades like direct injection and DOHC setup it could easily outperform GM's new 6.2L, and if Ford really wanted to invest in it, they could go from cast iron to all aluminum and essentially it would become a 6.2L Coyote, which would be bad ***.

I stand strongly for having more options instead of less.

Someone stated in an earlier post that they believe the 3.5L N/A V6 is pretty useless, and other than its likely use in fleet vehicles I tend to agree. People who prefer N/A engine's in their trucks will almost always choose the V8 over the V6,

As they essentially stated I think the engine lineup should go,

2.7L
5.0L
3.5L Ecoboost
6.2L / ?.? Twin Turbo V8?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-11-2014, 05:29 PM
xr7gt390's Avatar
xr7gt390 xr7gt390 is online now
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North West Indiana
Posts: 2,409
xr7gt390 has a great reputation on FTE.xr7gt390 has a great reputation on FTE.xr7gt390 has a great reputation on FTE.xr7gt390 has a great reputation on FTE.
The V6 NA engines attract a certain type of buyer. My brother owns a 2014 V6 F150 and my dad owns a 2001 V6 F150. They both work in the steel industry and like vehicles that have ground clearance to get around the snow ruts semi truck leave in the lots. They like a vehicle that can haul what they need, tow a utility trail and make an occasional hunting trip. If Ford didn't have a V6 they both would be driving some thing else.
Today's V6 puts down better performance numbers than the V8's of yesterday all while getting better mileage. I would guess the demand for a V6 is much greater than the demand for the 6.2L V8.
I do hate to see the 6.2 go. There's nothing like the sound of a big inch V8. Back when I was young our motto was "There's no substitute for displacement". I'll probably always stick with the EcoBoost V6 however, there is some sort of satisfaction knowing that your brand has a big V8 in it's lineup. I hope the 6.2 returns.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-11-2014, 10:09 PM
Lectrocuted Lectrocuted is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 679
Lectrocuted is starting off with a positive reputation.
Voted yes. Loving my fx4 so far. Only 1200 miles though.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-12-2014, 10:31 AM
Scorpion67 Scorpion67 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 390
Scorpion67 is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I vote no, only because if you need an engine that big, you should get a more capable truck to go with it, like an F250, which will soon have the same cab as the F150. There's never been a huge price gap to move up to the higher class, and if it were an option in the F150, it would be a $3,000 option anyway. I can see why Ford chose not to offer it. GM is hardly pushing their 6.2 either. Late availability, only optional on LTZ, High Country, and Denali.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-17-2014, 11:07 AM
bigblueknight's Avatar
bigblueknight bigblueknight is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boise,Idaho
Posts: 124
bigblueknight is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
I think the 6.2l or a suitable replacement should have been left as an option almost exclusively because you're competitors offer a big v8 in their trucks. There is always going to be a certain group of people out there who aren't going to buy into the eco boost over a v8 as evidenced by the constant debates I see on here and f150forum.com over what's better the 5.0 or the ecoboost. I have to admit I feel still feel a little silly sometimes telling someone I have a 3.5l v6 in my truck because to me a full size truck and a v8 go together like biscuits and gravy or bacon and eggs. Obviously that is changing with the rise of the ecoboost but everyone still figures I have a big v8 under the hood until I tell them otherwise. The 6.2 wasn't an option in the king ranch so I went with the ecoboost max tow package once I decided that I didn't need a f250 with the 6.2. I do a lot more towing and hauling than I initially thought I would when I bought my truck and If I could do it over I would go 350 with the 6.2 but the eco boost gets the job done. I love having the power of the 6.2 when I need to tow something but not having the mileage of the 6.2 when I'm driving around unloaded.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 03-22-2015, 03:11 PM
brokenleg brokenleg is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,070
brokenleg has a good reputation on FTE.brokenleg has a good reputation on FTE.
The 6.2 is rare in the 150s...................But I bought a 2013, with the 6.2.(used) I simply wanted the 6.2 because I tow quite a bit. but I don't drive the truck everyday. Should have they kept it as an option? probably not. very few were built.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 03-28-2015, 02:22 PM
elemint elemint is offline
Elder User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: outback
Posts: 839
elemint is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Ford makes too many engines as it is. I would like them to use no more than 2 engine options for any vehicle. Imagine how much money could be saved by everyone if parts inventories could be cut in half?
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-28-2015, 02:34 PM
NYCruiser NYCruiser is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Yonkers, NY
Posts: 475
NYCruiser is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tseekins View Post
I saw a RAM commercial last night touting the 2015 Hemi 5.7L with 395 HP and up to 22 MPG's. It can be done with some technology but the 6.2L wasn't the answer.
The Hemi is a strong motor, but not without issues. The cylinder deactivation is absolutely terrible. Not to mention the very common "Hemi Valve Tick". Also the shift algorithms that always keep it in a higher gear makes it sluggish as heck whenever you stomp on it unless you are manually holding the truck in lower gears. Not to mention that it comes wrapped in a truck with all kinds of quality issues.

I just traded my 2014 Hemi ram because I couldn't take it anymore and bought a 2015 F-250 with 6.2.

The Ram would leave this 250 sitting at a light it was so quick, but that's not what the 250 is for. I have no regrets.

Back on point - I see why Ford dropped the 6.2 from the F-150, but think they still should have updated the valve train at the same time for the 250's.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-31-2015, 09:23 PM
Frantz's Avatar
Frantz Frantz is online now
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Lewisberry, Penn
Posts: 2,482
Frantz is a splendid one to beholdFrantz is a splendid one to beholdFrantz is a splendid one to beholdFrantz is a splendid one to beholdFrantz is a splendid one to beholdFrantz is a splendid one to beholdFrantz is a splendid one to behold
if you need the 6.2, you can get one on the base f250 for little more than the up-charge would cost on an f150. Also, if you need more than the 3.5 can put out, you're really in SuperDuty territory anyhow.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question of the Week: 5.0L V8 or 3.5L EcoBoost to Replace 6.2L Super Duty Engine? Patrick R. 2017 Super Duty 240 07-05-2015 07:18 PM
Helping a friend purchase a Raptor. smokeyjo50 2010 - 2014 Ford SVT F150 Raptor 0 07-02-2015 10:26 PM
Question of the Week: Do you like the EcoBoost engine in the new Raptor? Patrick R. 2015+ F150 3 01-19-2015 09:24 AM
New Roush Supercharger on my 2011 Ford F-150 Limited Lariat jaytee04 Lightning, Harley-Davidson F-150, Roush F-150 & Saleen F-150 4 12-04-2012 11:27 AM
New Roush Supercharger on my 2011 Ford F-150 Limited Lariat jaytee04 2009 - 2014 F150 18 09-03-2012 06:35 AM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums >

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 PM.


 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
What's your question?
Send