Which CAM should I use in my 351m/400 6.6?

  #16  
Old 08-14-2014, 05:18 PM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
The only way to tell, and I mean the ONLY way to tell, is to measure the stroke. Some say you can tell by the casting number on the block but that isn't true. I have a 400 that has what some say are 351M casting numbers. And valve covers and other parts are easily swapped between the two.

So you must measure the stoke, and that is almost impossible without pulling the engine apart. But, you could flood a cylinder with something like oil when at BDC and then capture the oil pushed out via the spark plug hole when you turn it over slowing. Measuring the oil would tell you. And even if some leaked by the rings or out a valve it would still be over a 351 if a 400.
 
  #17  
Old 08-14-2014, 05:25 PM
Augy88066's Avatar
Augy88066
Augy88066 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
The only way to tell, and I mean the ONLY way to tell, is to measure the stroke. Some say you can tell by the casting number on the block but that isn't true. I have a 400 that has what some say are 351M casting numbers. And valve covers and other parts are easily swapped between the two.

So you must measure the stoke, and that is almost impossible without pulling the engine apart. But, you could flood a cylinder with something like oil when at BDC and then capture the oil pushed out via the spark plug hole when you turn it over slowing. Measuring the oil would tell you. And even if some leaked by the rings or out a valve it would still be over a 351 if a 400.
Thanks for the information, I can easily see how it can be difficult to identify a 400 motor. For now I will assume it's a 400 based on the label and who I purchased it from.

I guess I will also wait for additional feedback from other users on what my next steps should be.

Thanks again Gary!
 
  #18  
Old 08-14-2014, 06:20 PM
Augy88066's Avatar
Augy88066
Augy88066 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a little update, I called CompCams and they recommended the following Cam kits for my 400 motor:

Xtreme Energy™, XE256H: Cam & Kit

Xtreme Energy™, XE262H: Cam & Kit

Just adding more options to the table. They stated that I could use these and leave the motor as is as long as I buy the kit.
 
  #19  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:02 PM
BuzzLOL's Avatar
BuzzLOL
BuzzLOL is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
.
. Unless someone swapped the valve covers, it should be a 400"... neither Ford nor Chevy liked to admit the actual compression ratio on their engines back then was actually in the 7's:1... if you read the entire thread that Gary linked to above it answers all your other questions... Comp wants to sell you a cam, so not going to tell you that you need decent pistons first... going bigger cam on low compression engine just makes it soggier and even worse on MPG...
 
  #20  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:23 PM
Augy88066's Avatar
Augy88066
Augy88066 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BuzzLOL
.
. Unless someone swapped the valve covers, it should be a 400"... neither Ford nor Chevy liked to admit the actual compression ratio on their engines back then was actually in the 7's:1... if you read the entire thread that Gary linked to above it answers all your other questions... Comp wants to sell you a cam, so not going to tell you that you need decent pistons first... going bigger cam on low compression engine just makes it soggier and even worse on MPG...
What you're saying makes sense after reading through the article. In regards to pistons, what would you recommend? The link for Dynagear in the 351/400 Bronco article no longer works.

Thanks!
 
  #21  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:42 PM
BuzzLOL's Avatar
BuzzLOL
BuzzLOL is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
.
. There's only one source for reasonably priced off-the-shelf pistons, and that's TMI who has KB 351C pistons factory modified to fit 400's...

http://www.tmeyerinc.com

. After pistons, what you mainly want to use the truck for will determine which cam is best... I just picked up the Summit K5201 for mine... for hot street/off road use

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-k5201
 
  #22  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:44 PM
Augy88066's Avatar
Augy88066
Augy88066 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BuzzLOL
.
. There's only one source for reasonably priced off-the-shelf pistons, and that's TMI who has KB 351C pistons factory modified to fit 400's...

http://www.tmeyerinc.com
Thanks again guys, I will look into getting new pistons and a decent cam.

If I can't afford pistons though, I may just get a lower end cam like you recommended earlier.
 
  #23  
Old 08-14-2014, 09:58 PM
BuzzLOL's Avatar
BuzzLOL
BuzzLOL is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
.
. I think DynaGear made the 'Ohio' pistons, some of which weren't too bad, like the rare 1971-only 400" pistons, but I think they are out of business now... all other general 'rebuilder' pistons sit way too far down in the cylinders...

. You can call TMI and discuss your plans with Tim...

. Only other choice is get pistons and have them modified somewhere's or modify the rods to fit the smaller 351C piston pins... I want about 11:1 compression, willing to use octane booster all the time, so may modify these domed top pistons:

KB149 Ford 351C Hypereutectic Piston
.
 
  #24  
Old 08-14-2014, 11:03 PM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
I would do a leak-down test to understand how worn the engine is before jumping in to completely rebuild it. You won't be able to have it bored and install new pistons and rings for much less than $1500. But if the rings are ok then advancing the existing cam will give more performance for very little money.
 
  #25  
Old 08-16-2014, 11:14 AM
SDDL-UP's Avatar
SDDL-UP
SDDL-UP is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 918
Received 28 Likes on 22 Posts
I would go with the 255 DEH - folks here seem to have very good success with that cam.
 
  #26  
Old 09-04-2014, 08:07 AM
Augy88066's Avatar
Augy88066
Augy88066 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since I have a 400 motor, would it be more economical to revert the 8 degree timing chain issue instead of adding a cam? Thoughts?
 
  #27  
Old 09-04-2014, 08:27 AM
BuzzLOL's Avatar
BuzzLOL
BuzzLOL is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
. Yes, fixing the retarded timing helps power and MPG some... not much use going bigger cam unless adding pistons to increase the compression ratio... if not, even stock cam too big...
 
  #28  
Old 09-04-2014, 08:42 AM
Augy88066's Avatar
Augy88066
Augy88066 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BuzzLOL
. Yes, fixing the retarded timing helps power and MPG some... not much use going bigger cam unless adding pistons to increase the compression ratio... if not, even stock cam too big...
Just to confirm, this would be the issue with a 1978 400 6.6 engine?
 
  #29  
Old 09-04-2014, 09:17 AM
Gary Lewis's Avatar
Gary Lewis
Gary Lewis is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast, OK
Posts: 32,866
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Buzz will confirm in a bit, I'm sure, but that's a big YES. BY 78 the factory cam timing was badly retarded and the engines ran poorly.
 
  #30  
Old 09-04-2014, 01:29 PM
Augy88066's Avatar
Augy88066
Augy88066 is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gary Lewis
Buzz will confirm in a bit, I'm sure, but that's a big YES. BY 78 the factory cam timing was badly retarded and the engines ran poorly.
Thanks! I will wait for a response from Buzz. It may make sense for me to replace just the intake and carb if I fix the retarded timing chain.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Which CAM should I use in my 351m/400 6.6?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 AM.