240 And 300 Cylinder Head Differentiation

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 12-27-2014, 01:48 AM
fordman75's Avatar
fordman75
fordman75 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: South central, Minnesota
Posts: 5,824
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by THE67MIGHTYMOUSE
Here is my riddle someone can solve. 1965 F-100 4x4, 300ci. Vin # indicates a 300. I pulled the engine for my truck and am in the process of a re-build. Block: C5AE. Head: C5AE. To my pleasant surprise, the head was the smaller closed cumbustion chamber of the 240.(found this out after i went through the trouble of sourcing and re-building a different 240 head, C8AE from a 71 f-100) The cranking assembly was all original save for one piston which was replaced early in its life. Stroke: 3.98. (300ci). Could this setup come from the factory, or did someone make a hybrid using a 240 block and head with a 300 cranking assembly? Thank you to the OP for all the info with the two heads, it has been very helpful.
A lot of parts gets mixed and matched by previous owners. So unless you are the original owner of a truck, it's next to impossible to confirm what is and isn't original to a truck.
 
  #32  
Old 12-27-2014, 05:00 AM
trozei's Avatar
trozei
trozei is offline
Postmaster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Langley, BC
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by THE67MIGHTYMOUSE
Here is my riddle someone can solve. 1965 F-100 4x4, 300ci. Vin # indicates a 300. I pulled the engine for my truck and am in the process of a re-build. Block: C5AE. Head: C5AE. To my pleasant surprise, the head was the smaller closed cumbustion chamber of the 240.(found this out after i went through the trouble of sourcing and re-building a different 240 head, C8AE from a 71 f-100) The cranking assembly was all original save for one piston which was replaced early in its life. Stroke: 3.98. (300ci). Could this setup come from the factory, or did someone make a hybrid using a 240 block and head with a 300 cranking assembly? Thank you to the OP for all the info with the two heads, it has been very helpful.
Funny. We are in very similar situations. 1969 F100, VIN indicates a 300, both head and block are C6AE, and I discovered that the head was a 240 head after sourcing a different 240 head, which proved to be quite difficult to do.

No, there's no way Ford would have originally installed a 240 head on a 300 but that doesn't mean that someone didn't immediately put one on. We already have proof that the engine has been messed with since you have a replacement piston in there (I wonder what the story on that is?) so I'm willing to bet that whoever did that swapped the head.
 
  #33  
Old 12-06-2015, 05:05 PM
PetesPonies's Avatar
PetesPonies
PetesPonies is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Pasadena US
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by trozei
C9 is definitely a date code. It means the part was made in 1969. There was no 9AB used on these heads. It would only be C9. Look at the picture of the 240 head at the top. It's a D2AE, or a 240 head from 1972.
C9 would mean the design was done for 1969. The nest letter would tell you what engineering group is responsible. But neither would tell you what vehicle line they were installed in or when they were made.A C9A part would be designed for a '69 fullsize, but could be used in a Torino in 1971 is't it fun?
 
  #34  
Old 12-04-2016, 12:47 PM
BronchitisO1's Avatar
BronchitisO1
BronchitisO1 is offline
New User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EFI

Originally Posted by trozei
I am making this thread to assist those who, like me, are or at least were at some point trying to find and identify a 240 or 300 head for whatever reason. In my case, I wanted a 240 head to install on a 300 block for the higher compression.

Hopefully, when Googled, this thread will show up for people. I found it harder than necessary to find a conclusive answer on the differences between the two. I know the information is out there, but it is scattered all over the place. I'd like to bring it all here in one spot to make it easier for anyone trying to learn.

There isn't much in terms of physical differentiation between the two. Here is a collection of what little differences there are.

All information is for North American vehicles.

If an error is spotted or further information is revealed, please let me know and I will add it to the list. I want to make this as easy as possible for anyone researching. I don't want them to be scrolling through pages of this thread to get their information.

Casting numbers.

The casting number can be found at the front of the head, on the bottom, underneath the thermostat, offset toward the driver's side. Like any Ford part, it will start with a letter and then a number.

The letter represents the decade and the number represents the specific year.

Example: C9

B = 1950
C = 1960
D = 1970
E = 1980
F = 1990

Adding the number, we can conclude that a C9 casting was from 1969.

It can be noted that Ford used this date coding system on pretty well every part they made.

After the date stamp, the next two letters are important. It will either be AE or TE.

Example: C9AE

AE = Automotive Engine
TE = Truck Engine

Ford was notorious for not being consistent with their casting numbers, so I can give no definitive answer. I can only say what things should be. If the head has AE, it is highly likely to be a 240. If the head has TE, it should be a 300.

Any proceeding numbers after the first four are irrelevant.

Availability.

The 240 was used in full size cars from 1965 to 1972, and up to 1974 for fleet vehicles. In trucks and vans, it was used from 1963 to 1974.

The 300 was used in F-series trucks and E-series vans from 1965 to 1996, but in 1987 the 300 was converted to fuel injection, which used a different head.

Valvetrain.

Valves, seals, springs, retainers, rockers, and anything else related to the valvetrain is all interchangeable.

Physical characteristics.

The spark plugs are on the driver's side and the intake and exhaust are on the passenger side.

The head dimensions (LxWxH) are 29 1/8" x 6 3/16" x 3 3/4". The height measurement does not include the rocker pedestals.

Block Differences.

If the head is still on the engine, it is honestly impossible to know for absolute certainty whether or not the head is a 240 or 300 head. All these clues can lead you to believe that it is one or the other, but thanks to Ford's lack of proper casting identification, it is impossible to know for sure.

For further evidence, however, we can look at the block. Its casting number will also be an AE or TE. This casting number is located on the passenger side, down low near the oil pan, and rearward by the starter. Again, AE likely means 240 and TE should be a 300, but Ford often used whatever blocks they had on hand on engines where the stroke was the only difference, such as their "big block six".

So, to know for sure what displacement the block is, we can pull a spark plug, stick a piece of wire down in the cylinder, and measure the stroke by rotating the engine.

The 240's stroke is 3.18" and the 300's is 3.98".

Combustion chamber.

A 300's combustion chamber measures 76cc and the 240's measures 68cc.

The combustion chamber is the biggest difference between the two. Excluding the casting number, it is the only difference. If you have the head on the engine, you can only be hopeful that you have the head you want. If you have the head off the engine, you can instantly know what head you have.

The 300 chamber looks like a D, and the 240 chamber looks like a kidney bean.

Note the difference?

300:



240:

Would I be able to out the 240 head on my 300 EFI motor? Or would I have to switch to carb?
 
  #35  
Old 12-04-2016, 01:43 PM
The Frenchtown Flyer's Avatar
The Frenchtown Flyer
The Frenchtown Flyer is online now
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,638
Received 61 Likes on 49 Posts
The 240 head will physically bolt up to the EFI block, with minor exception, but the combustion chamber does not have the proper burn rate characteristics, so doing so would leave you with an engine that doesn't get enough spark advance. That, plus there are two less bolt bosses for the exhaust manifolds. I suggest you stay with an EFI head for a rebuild.
 
  #36  
Old 12-04-2016, 01:45 PM
BronchitisO1's Avatar
BronchitisO1
BronchitisO1 is offline
New User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EFI

Originally Posted by The Frenchtown Flyer
The 240 head will physically bolt up to the EFI block, with minor exception, but the combustion chamber does not have the proper burn rate characteristics, so doing so would leave you with an engine that doesn't get enough spark advance. That, plus there are two less bolt bosses for the exhaust manifolds. I suggest you stay with an EFI head for a rebuild.
Oh ok! I've been wanting to do some performance upgrades to my 300 but I have no clue what to do, and I was told that getting the better compression ratio was a good start so I wasn't sure, thanks!
 
  #37  
Old 12-04-2016, 02:03 PM
F-250 restorer's Avatar
F-250 restorer
F-250 restorer is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Los Angeles
Posts: 6,574
Received 137 Likes on 117 Posts
I believe there are two details, two variations of the 300 head, that should be mentioned: Non smog heads that have ridges in the chambers, as in this photo (an 82 300 head):

Name:  5c01614c-552d-4f33-be56-b37b7c45cb84_zpse7c8e88e.jpg
Views: 11183
Size:  275.5 KB

Mention should also be made that in the late eighties, a few years before efi came out, Ford changed the length of the valves in the 300 head. I believe it happened in 86, but a check of the old/new valves at SI valves would confirm the year the change occurred.
 
  #38  
Old 03-10-2017, 07:30 PM
scoobyvanjack's Avatar
scoobyvanjack
scoobyvanjack is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Las Vegas NV.
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question about light and heavy duty 300. Is there light duty engines with out the 240 head. or better put is the heavy dty 300 the one that was fitted into the larger trucks. it is my understanding the 300's in the larger F bodys had a forge internals to increase the operating range of the power band. I've never been able to locate them but I got part #'s from Number dummy that do checked out.
 
  #39  
Old 09-12-2020, 08:37 PM
Van Wailin's Avatar
Van Wailin
Van Wailin is offline
New User
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just bought a '67 Supervan. trying to decipher the engine and trans combo so I can buy the proper shop manuals. I understand that it can't be done accurately without pulling the head but I'm just trying to get a jump off point. Here is the numbers I have found.

Engine block: D8TE-6015-AA
Head: C6AE C
Trans: PEA L
240 6G 2904
Carbuerator: Autolite 1100 singe barrel (ID'd through online pics and diagrams)

I have dug around some sites and found that these numbers can only give vague dates of engineering but I thought I'd throw it out there to people that would know more than I to see if I can narrow it down further. I have my thoughts on what these numbers could mean but I'm interested to know what you all say about them. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

 
  #40  
Old 09-12-2020, 08:57 PM
fordman75's Avatar
fordman75
fordman75 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: South central, Minnesota
Posts: 5,824
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
That's a late 70's early 80's 300 block. It could have 240 internals. You won't know without measuring the stroke or tearing down and inspecting rotating assembly casting #'s.

The head is a 240 head.

No clue on the transmission. Is it a manual or a automatic? If it's a 3spd manual it should just be a the Econoline version of the 3.03 3spd. If it's a automatic I believe it should be a C4.
 
  #41  
Old 09-12-2020, 09:22 PM
Van Wailin's Avatar
Van Wailin
Van Wailin is offline
New User
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fordman75
That's a late 70's early 80's 300 block. It could have 240 internals. You won't know without measuring the stroke or tearing down and inspecting rotating assembly casting #'s.

The head is a 240 head.

No clue on the transmission. Is it a manual or a automatic? If it's a 3spd manual it should just be a the Econoline version of the 3.03 3spd. If it's a automatic I believe it should be a C4.
Thanks for the reply. This was my thinking on the block/head as well. The trans is auto 3 speed. From what I can gather on the web, the trans is probably the original '67 C4 (XP?).

Any advice on which manual I should purchase for the engine? I have already ordered the '67 Econoline manual for the chassis, etc.

Thanks

PS: Thats the van below, and yes it has green lights underneath and beer taps that come out of the side.



 
The following users liked this post:
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jonesy1981
Performance & General Engine Building
1
07-03-2014 01:10 PM
The_SnowMan710
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
4
01-09-2009 12:12 AM
Bdox
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
1
05-03-2007 10:35 AM
f1panel
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
2
06-22-2006 09:25 AM
Supercab
Ford Inline Six, 200, 250, 4.9L / 300
3
10-04-2001 08:46 AM



Quick Reply: 240 And 300 Cylinder Head Differentiation



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.