Notices
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

Injector Nozzle % Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 10:38 PM
  #16  
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 18,849
Likes: 179
From: Puget Sound
Originally Posted by JT250
...I was referring to the extra money he had to spend (not expected) due the extra HP. Most the traction/ladder bars. The smaller nozzles would be less likely cause the need for these. Also if I had nozzles that big I would want to step up to a larger turbo to be able to support them.
I was saying I would not want 100% nozzles because they would cause me to spend even more money on the truck. I know that he is happy with the injectors and your tuning.
Ah... now I know for sure you're talking about me - there's more than one Rich around here.

Now with all of that spending behind me... I'm real happy with what Stinky can do if I so choose. I've been reading up on standard EGTs while driving 65MPH on the flat, I've got a lot of practice looking at the EGT gauge and AE/Torque data, and I've had multiple tunes on two tuning platforms. The 100% nozzles (with plenty of air) give me a cold exhaust. Winter numbers: 200 - 300 degrees F while idling, 525 - 575 degrees at 65 MPH on the flat, and 1200 degrees is about all I can do in permagrin mode. That last number is not towing, so I can't yet know what heat soak will do to me. I can't stay in the throttle long enough to see what a long burn will do - the truck goes too fast too soon.

Nozzles: 160/0 gives you cooler EGTs than stockers by default (easier to get the fuel in quicker). Flash a lit match under your hand, then take that lit match and hold it under your hand a while longer. That's the difference between single-shot and split-shot injectors - the singles are quicker. Even with that, the 160/0 is for trucks needing more torque, not high-RPM performance. In order to keep the power up through the RPM range, the nozzles need to be bigger.

The 30% nozzle is an "augered out" (slang, not a technical term) stock nozzle. This gives you slightly better high-RPM performance, but the stick still can't drain completely on race day. I have been told this one is easy to tune for, and it makes sense when I think it through.

The 80% nozzle is a whole different nozzle from the manufacturer. With this nozzle, you just crossed a line. You can get all the fuel out of the stick at high revs, but this is entering the Buck$Zooka live-fire range. Your cold starts will no longer be smoke-free, the axle-wrap fenceline is here, your transmission had better be up for this, and remote tuning won't likely give you the street manners you're accustomed to.

The 100% nozzle is an augered-out 80% nozzle. These can give some really low EGTs (with more air). They are slightly quicker than the 80%, and they can truly drain at redline on our truck. This was the Holy Grail for so many people - use all the fuel in the stick when racing with this size. I didn't get 100% for racing, I got 100% for the cold EGTs when towing my next boat in the summer... and for the room they have during the injection cycle.

To explain that better: As we drive along, we have so many milliseconds of time to get the fuel into the cylinder and burned before the piston pulls away from the fire. The higher the RPM, the fewer milliseconds we have. At lower RPM, the window to inject fuel is quite wide... and this is where the tuner has options when the nozzle is big enough. A tow tune can be more of a tow tune here... but more oomph in the low end can make more heat and your cylinder pressure can get excessive - if the tuner isn't careful. I've seen this happen.

If you go with the 80% or the 100% nozzles in search of lower EGTs, you can always dial down the power to avoid axle-angling, driveline deforming, and transmission torture - but you can't easily avoid the smoky cold starts and the need for live tuning.

The main problem with going for a stick-up is the stock air system was matched to the stock injectors without tuning... and these sticks (with tuning) move way past that. To fully use what the IH 160s can deliver, you really want more air - in and out. Yes... you can "get by" without air mods, or you can have the sticks detuned to stock power. To really fly, that dragon's gunna need air under the wings.

Air, air, and more air has been my big effort since the new sticks arrived... and it really helped. The 38R is not the most powerful puffer in the paddock, but it gets it done with a breathing cold-air intake and a 4" exhaust. After all I've learned from my mistakes and successes, if I had to choose only one this year and the other one next year - I'd choose air before fuel. Here's stock sticks, stock tune, and a stock turbo with bigger hardware before and after the GTP38:




And here's the 160/100 at play with an even bigger intake and a 38R:


There are those out there with 250/200s and 450/400s that may chuckle at my grand descriptions of the added power from a lowly 160cc injector... but properly applied, these sticks don't mess around.


 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 10:57 PM
  #17  
ScaldedDog's Avatar
ScaldedDog
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 155
From: Sedalia, CO
Club FTE Silver Member

/\ That's a great post.

Mark
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 11:05 PM
  #18  
Tim Hodgson's Avatar
Tim Hodgson
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 52
From: Sacramento Delta, CA
Originally Posted by ScaldedDog
/\ That's a great post.

Mark
I agree.

True he may not have the depth of knowledge in any one area which other longtime members or diesel professionals on this forum may have, but undeniably through trial and error and superior intellect and honesty to share his mistakes as well as his successes, it has all come together for Rich.

And he is explaining how the various components of the system work together in a way which even I can understand. No doubt he is helping others too.

I just repped Rich. I suggested that he can now change his avatar caption from "I'm a cautionary tale" to "guru in training..."

(Let's encourage him to keep posting!)
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 06:53 AM
  #19  
Dan V's Avatar
Dan V
Lead Driver
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,647
Likes: 891
From: north of Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by white Buffalo
About 7 years ago all my upgrades were aimed at lowering EGT's. The Van Turbo & gutting the EBPV dropped them @100 degrees, installing the DI intercooler resulted in the largest drop and the Swamps 175/146 single shots even help lower them a tad.
The 175/146 is just more cc's than the AC's...and they have a stock nozzle..and you got a tad lower EGT. That's opposite of JT250 experience with a 30% nozzle.

The question is this...are both Jason's experience out of ordinary? And some other issue needs addressed to get back to the top of the Bell Curve?
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 07:19 AM
  #20  
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 18,849
Likes: 179
From: Puget Sound
Originally Posted by Dan V
The 175/146 is just more cc's than the AC's...and they have a stock nozzle....
I'm sorry I have to be the one to break this to you, but that second number after the hash is percent above stock nozzle (in terms of flow). A "/0" is stock, and a "/100" can deliver twice the injector's available fuel with the exact same ICP/FIPW as a "/0".

There are so many things that can cause high EGTs, the stick by itself is not the "easy button". Tuning, the air system, and fixing exhaust/boost leaks are additional (and necessary) components to the easy button.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 07:32 AM
  #21  
Dan V's Avatar
Dan V
Lead Driver
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,647
Likes: 891
From: north of Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by Tugly
I'm sorry I have to be the one to break this to you, but that second number after the hash is percent above stock nozzle (in terms of flow). A "/0" is stock, and a "/100" can deliver twice the injector's available fuel with the exact same ICP/FIPW as a "/0".

There are so many things that can cause high EGTs, that the stick by itself is not the "easy button".
Rich, by all accounts and according to Swamp's...the designation 146 is the OEM nozzle.

The 175/146 injectors are a terrific upgrade for those 1999-2003, 7.3L owners looking for efficiency, as well as a modest power increase. The 175 single shot injectors retain the OEM ("146"nozzle), use NO more high pressure oil than stock AD split shot injectors, yet flow 25+cc's more fuel.
and a little blurb from Tim @ PIS:

The 146
Nozzle is what swamps refers to as a stock nozzle. Based off measurements of the 7 holes in the nozzle.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 07:52 AM
  #22  
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 18,849
Likes: 179
From: Puget Sound
Originally Posted by Dan V
Rich, by all accounts and according to Swamp's...the designation 146 is the OEM nozzle.
I stand corrected. This is the important part of getting info from the forum... allowing time for more input from other sources. Thank you for this important information. Swamps has gone off the page in their injector designations, but their way makes sense and I can't disagree with it. If everybody held to this method, I have 160/292s... but it will take a while to wrap my head around the significance of this. The question then becomes "At what ICP and FIPW do you see the full 146, or would I see the full 160?" The injector professionals (with a flow bench) know this one, and they pass that info onto the tuners.

Tried to rep you, but I have to spread 'em around.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 07:59 AM
  #23  
Dan V's Avatar
Dan V
Lead Driver
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,647
Likes: 891
From: north of Minneapolis, MN
A little industry wide standardization would go a long way to help people make decisions.

Thanks for "rep"...my one little Chiclet is lonesome.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 08:04 AM
  #24  
Dan V's Avatar
Dan V
Lead Driver
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,647
Likes: 891
From: north of Minneapolis, MN
Rich...in the things you write, one of the things I've paid attention to is cc's/nozzle/PW.

If a 160 with a stock nozzle can't be emptied in x amount of PW how does having 25 more ccs get emptied with a stock nozzle?
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 08:26 AM
  #25  
Dan V's Avatar
Dan V
Lead Driver
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5,647
Likes: 891
From: north of Minneapolis, MN
Ten pages here, 175/146 or 160/30's? on how nozzle size effects EGT and tuning.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 10:34 AM
  #26  
trekbasso's Avatar
trekbasso
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 9
From: Wellington, Co
Originally Posted by Dan V
Ten pages here, 175/146 or 160/30's? on how nozzle size effects EGT and tuning.
Rich, I got him for you. Dan, thanks for bringing that bit up, as simple language can confuse the heck out of the situation. "Most" other tuners/injector builders use the second number to indicate upgraded inj. size.
Looks like I have more reading to do.
 
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 11:31 AM
  #27  
Tugly's Avatar
Tugly
Hotshot
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 18,849
Likes: 179
From: Puget Sound
Originally Posted by Dan V
Rich...in the things you write, one of the things I've paid attention to is cc's/nozzle/PW.

If a 160 with a stock nozzle can't be emptied in x amount of PW how does having 25 more ccs get emptied with a stock nozzle?
That's a really big question with a surprising answer: You do get about 25 CCs (with tuning) more than stock (without tuning) but it doesn't drain the bigger stick at higher RPMs... this is true of a 160 or a 175. The stock AD/AE 140 (135,145, or whatever they call it) can't drain without tuning... but draining them carefully will yield another 60HP - no matter what moniker they hang on the tune. You might get a little more pop out of an AD/AE than the 60HP, but this would be through means other than fueling alone - like more air (always a good idea) or advancing the timing (Start Of Injection - bad juju, that one).
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 11:31 AM
  #28  
Submarine Docker's Avatar
Submarine Docker
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Mansfield Center, CT
Thanks for all the info. Great Stuff!! Who was the OEM for our injectors? Was it Alliant? I notice several vendors selling new injectors, wonder if they all come from the same manufacturer?

Jim
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 03:24 PM
  #29  
Bonanza35's Avatar
Bonanza35
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,399
Likes: 188
From: Norco,CA
Club FTE Silver Member

Alliant is OEM.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fordboy2
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
55
Feb 13, 2018 03:54 PM
ReBilld
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
576
Apr 15, 2013 08:38 PM
redman84
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
4
Sep 21, 2011 10:38 PM
AndeyHall
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
9
Jun 5, 2010 03:12 PM
PsD007.3
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
16
Feb 4, 2009 08:07 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE