1955 C-900 Build project Chucks Trucks
#16
Not sure JRJ.
Chuck's having his website revamped and we are trying to find a way to easily upload pics and/or video as we are progressing on the build. This way the client can pretty much get a very recent update whenever they want by following a link etc
We are still trying to figure out the best method to do so that we can easily tie to an iphone or pc to update on the fly, (ie photobucket, facebook, twitter, etc.) He wants to be able to easily link or embed it onto a page on the new website too.
Any opinions as to what ol' farts like us should use?
Chuck's having his website revamped and we are trying to find a way to easily upload pics and/or video as we are progressing on the build. This way the client can pretty much get a very recent update whenever they want by following a link etc
We are still trying to figure out the best method to do so that we can easily tie to an iphone or pc to update on the fly, (ie photobucket, facebook, twitter, etc.) He wants to be able to easily link or embed it onto a page on the new website too.
Any opinions as to what ol' farts like us should use?
#18
#19
Added another thread for another truck we are working on at Chuck's
A 48-50 F-1 pick up
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post13846355
A 48-50 F-1 pick up
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post13846355
#22
Yes we need to make it safe for the client so some updating is going to be needed.
Most of the valves and fittings are there, but we will be adding a trailer valve and re-bending all the tubing so it's not spaghetti, probably new cans. The brakes look clean but we'll have to see how shoes look once we go to wheels. They work we'll now, so first order of business is getting it drivable again once shortening is finished.
We're moving the compressor too because the one on it is from something later and mounts low and in the way. We sourced a new bracket and compressor (bad but has the parts we need) from a local a Salvage yard.
Most of the valves and fittings are there, but we will be adding a trailer valve and re-bending all the tubing so it's not spaghetti, probably new cans. The brakes look clean but we'll have to see how shoes look once we go to wheels. They work we'll now, so first order of business is getting it drivable again once shortening is finished.
We're moving the compressor too because the one on it is from something later and mounts low and in the way. We sourced a new bracket and compressor (bad but has the parts we need) from a local a Salvage yard.
#23
My 1953C750 Tractor
Interestingly, I did a similar project over 30 years ago. I still own the truck. It seemed to be low mileage with an unknown history, other than having a horse van body on the chassis.. I removed the body and shortened the frame 3.5 feet which brought it back to the 116 inch tractor wheelbase.
The transmission was 5 spd overdrive which I wasn't fond of, so I replaced it with a direct and installed a 5831 Dana (brownie) auxillary that had a slightly taller overdrive than the 5th over. This made a different truck out of it! Cruises nicely at 55 or 60, top speed is 83.
Down the road it broke a crank, so I replaced the 317 with a low mileage 332 out of a fire truck. I updated it a bit with a 4 barrell and a later distributor with both vacuum and centrifugal advance.
The amazing thing about this truck is how good it rides. Not bad bobtail and just great with a trailer. I hope the Texas customer enjoys his as much as I have mine.
The transmission was 5 spd overdrive which I wasn't fond of, so I replaced it with a direct and installed a 5831 Dana (brownie) auxillary that had a slightly taller overdrive than the 5th over. This made a different truck out of it! Cruises nicely at 55 or 60, top speed is 83.
Down the road it broke a crank, so I replaced the 317 with a low mileage 332 out of a fire truck. I updated it a bit with a 4 barrell and a later distributor with both vacuum and centrifugal advance.
The amazing thing about this truck is how good it rides. Not bad bobtail and just great with a trailer. I hope the Texas customer enjoys his as much as I have mine.
#24
Interestingly, I did a similar project over 30 years ago. I still own the truck. It seemed to be low mileage with an unknown history, other than having a horse van body on the chassis.. I removed the body and shortened the frame 3.5 feet which brought it back to the 116 inch tractor wheelbase.
The transmission was 5 spd overdrive which I wasn't fond of, so I replaced it with a direct and installed a 5831 Dana (brownie) auxillary that had a slightly taller overdrive than the 5th over. This made a different truck out of it! Cruises nicely at 55 or 60, top speed is 83.
Down the road it broke a crank, so I replaced the 317 with a low mileage 332 out of a fire truck. I updated it a bit with a 4 barrell and a later distributor with both vacuum and centrifugal advance.
The amazing thing about this truck is how good it rides. Not bad bobtail and just great with a trailer. I hope the Texas customer enjoys his as much as I have mine.
The transmission was 5 spd overdrive which I wasn't fond of, so I replaced it with a direct and installed a 5831 Dana (brownie) auxillary that had a slightly taller overdrive than the 5th over. This made a different truck out of it! Cruises nicely at 55 or 60, top speed is 83.
Down the road it broke a crank, so I replaced the 317 with a low mileage 332 out of a fire truck. I updated it a bit with a 4 barrell and a later distributor with both vacuum and centrifugal advance.
The amazing thing about this truck is how good it rides. Not bad bobtail and just great with a trailer. I hope the Texas customer enjoys his as much as I have mine.
Do you have any pictures of your truck?
#25
#27
#28
We're going to be looking for a saddle tank and period 5th wheel. I like the full fenders. over the rear too.
#29
Interestingly, I did a similar project over 30 years ago. I still own the truck. It seemed to be low mileage with an unknown history, other than having a horse van body on the chassis.. I removed the body and shortened the frame 3.5 feet which brought it back to the 116 inch tractor wheelbase. The transmission was 5 spd overdrive which I wasn't fond of, so I replaced it with a direct and installed a 5831 Dana (brownie) auxillary that had a slightly taller overdrive than the 5th over. This made a different truck out of it! Cruises nicely at 55 or 60, top speed is 83. Down the road it broke a crank, so I replaced the 317 with a low mileage 332 out of a fire truck. I updated it a bit with a 4 barrell and a later distributor with both vacuum and centrifugal advance. The amazing thing about this truck is how good it rides. Not bad bobtail and just great with a trailer. I hope the Texas customer enjoys his as much as I have mine.
Interestingly, I did a similar project over 30 years ago. I still own the truck. It seemed to be low mileage with an unknown history, other than having a horse van body on the chassis.. I removed the body and shortened the frame 3.5 feet which brought it back to the 116 inch tractor wheelbase. The transmission was 5 spd overdrive which I wasn't fond of, so I replaced it with a direct and installed a 5831 Dana (brownie) auxillary that had a slightly taller overdrive than the 5th over. This made a different truck out of it! Cruises nicely at 55 or 60, top speed is 83. Down the road it broke a crank, so I replaced the 317 with a low mileage 332 out of a fire truck. I updated it a bit with a 4 barrell and a later distributor with both vacuum and centrifugal advance. The amazing thing about this truck is how good it rides. Not bad bobtail and just great with a trailer. I hope the Texas customer enjoys his as much as I have mine.
Question: when you shortened the C-750 did you address the center drive shaft carrier hight? Did you shorten the perch that attaches to the crossmember or leave it as is?
We removed 40" from the frame just behind the cab, removed one crossmember and moved the crossmember with the support forward ( just under the rear cab wall) as well as shortened the front drive 40". The rear shaft will remain the same since we moved the crossmember equal distant.
The concern is if we leave the perch, will the front shaft angle will be too steep. Of course if we shorten the perch the rear shaft angle will change slightly
#30
Tom Question: when you shortened the C-750 did you address the center drive shaft carrier hight? Did you shorten the perch that attaches to the crossmember or leave it as is? We removed 40" from the frame just behind the cab, removed one crossmember and moved the crossmember with the support forward ( just under the rear cab wall) as well as shortened the front drive 40". The rear shaft will remain the same since we moved the crossmember equal distant. The concern is if we leave the perch, will the front shaft angle will be too steep. Of course if we shorten the perch the rear shaft angle will change slightly
We have to shorten the perch quite a bit to make it correct. Plan on sectioning It from about 3 1/2" tall to 1/2". Brings all the pinion angles back in line.