351w hp and trq guess?
#1
351w hp and trq guess?
So I know I will get flamed for this question. i have accepted that at this point but I cant seem to find a good answer online. I have my 96 351w that has been rebuilt. it is bored .30 over with 9.5:1 compression. it has a 270 276 cam in it with 480/480 lift. @ 50 duration is 214/220 with 1:12 lobe separation... obviously a high torque RV style cam. I am running the stock heads and intake with Mass air but I do have equal length long tube headers on it with full exhaust.
Anybody ever seen a dyno sheet on a mild build like this? what kind of numbers should I get from it? by my calculations I was thinking about 290hp and 400 Ft/lbs of torque. does that seem about right? thanks,
Anybody ever seen a dyno sheet on a mild build like this? what kind of numbers should I get from it? by my calculations I was thinking about 290hp and 400 Ft/lbs of torque. does that seem about right? thanks,
#2
I don't think 290hp/400tq is gonna happen with stock E7 heads. I would guess more around 250-275hp/~350tq. Those are at the crank as well, not the wheels.
I have been playing with that desktop dyno program quiet a lot lately. Who knows how accurate it is, but I set up a 351, .030 over with 9.72:1 compression, GT40 heads, a Comp Cam #35-351-8 which has about the same duration as you listed but 114* LSA and .512" lift for intake and exhaust. It showed ~320hp/~455tq. I'm not sure how realistic that is but I think it might be the setup I try if it will actually work.
I can run your setup through it when I get home if you can find out what cam you have.
I have been playing with that desktop dyno program quiet a lot lately. Who knows how accurate it is, but I set up a 351, .030 over with 9.72:1 compression, GT40 heads, a Comp Cam #35-351-8 which has about the same duration as you listed but 114* LSA and .512" lift for intake and exhaust. It showed ~320hp/~455tq. I'm not sure how realistic that is but I think it might be the setup I try if it will actually work.
I can run your setup through it when I get home if you can find out what cam you have.
#6
i would agree with Evan_P on the HP and torque numbers. You may get closer to what you were thinking if you maybe went for an intake upgrade and possibly a higher ratio on your rockers. Not to try to hijack a thread but Evan_p what is the dyno program you are using? is it basically a simulator to give you an idea what your power should be with given platform and mods? i have been looking for something like that for a little while and haven't really came across much.
#7
i would agree with Evan_P on the HP and torque numbers. You may get closer to what you were thinking if you maybe went for an intake upgrade and possibly a higher ratio on your rockers. Not to try to hijack a thread but Evan_p what is the dyno program you are using? is it basically a simulator to give you an idea what your power should be with given platform and mods? i have been looking for something like that for a little while and haven't really came across much.
Trending Topics
#9
Little bit of a hijack here, but what do you think of the Comp Cams 35-308-8 Conanski?
#11
so I will keep an eye out for a new intake. what should I be looking for with this set up? what would be the gains assuming i keep the stock e7 heads?
#12
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,898
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes
on
755 Posts
Stock E7 heads are close behind in the intake at being a bottleneck so the most you'll see with a better intake is 275-280hp, with a Typhoon or Performer intake and GT40 or Performer heads the motor would make 300-325hp, go to a better head like a TFS 170 or AFR 185 and you would be in the 375-400hp territory.
#13
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tifford
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
19
04-25-2009 08:14 AM
BBF250
Big Block V8 - 385 Series (6.1/370, 7.0/429, 7.5/460)
3
04-02-2005 10:55 AM
NoAZ'68
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
7
02-02-2005 03:37 PM
MrMotorsport
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
02-27-2002 01:53 PM