1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Tech Info needed - GM F-body subframe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-16-2013, 10:26 AM
CharlieLed's Avatar
CharlieLed
CharlieLed is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 7,863
Received 465 Likes on 301 Posts
Tech Info needed - GM F-body subframe

I am in the process of designing the chassis for my next project and have found that there is not much in the way of technical drawings available for the GM subframe out of the Gen 2 F-body (70-81 Camaro specifically). I have found some drawings showing frame alignment points but nothing that shows the axle center line. With all the F100s that have these clips I figured that someone here would have some more data on them. Thanks...
 
  #2  
Old 08-16-2013, 12:26 PM
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
AXracer is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Durham NC
Posts: 15,844
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
I'm real curious what would make you select that IFS when there are far better choices out there? The turning radius is huge, the steering is slow, the geometry is nothing to write home about, they are big and heavy and even the F body guys are ripping them out and replacing them with MII front clips.
 
  #3  
Old 08-16-2013, 12:39 PM
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
ALBUQ F-1 is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NM
Posts: 26,799
Received 607 Likes on 377 Posts
AX, I know you're no fan of the F-body clip, but I could name a dozen or more folks on here with it. Most, like Garry/Homade rave about it. I've ridden in his truck and heavy or not, it rides like a dream and no question he drives the snot out of it. As a former F-body owner, I can tell you that what they do with their cars is not a good gauge of what we should do to our trucks.
 
Attached Images  
  #4  
Old 08-16-2013, 12:50 PM
CharlieLed's Avatar
CharlieLed
CharlieLed is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 7,863
Received 465 Likes on 301 Posts
It is not for an F100, it is for my 50 Merc Coupe...long wheelbase, narrow in the engine area of the frame, heavy, low-performance cruiser; perfect candidate for this IFS.
 
  #5  
Old 08-16-2013, 12:57 PM
AXracer's Avatar
AXracer
AXracer is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Durham NC
Posts: 15,844
Received 53 Likes on 34 Posts
I know a number of people on here with Volare and the other Mopar IFS that Gibbon used to sell the crossmember for, and they swear by them also, but that doesn't mean they would be my first or final choice out of all that is available today, Lexus, C4 Vette, Jag, (Anyone else know that the Solstice lightweight structural foam filled front crossmember unbolts and the subframe is exactly the width of an f100 frame? The tread width is within 1/2", the control arms are lightweight aluminum, it uses coilovers and the design and geometry is based on the C6 Vette... )

Charlie, haven't done it, but I understand the 50 Merc practically bolts to a late model GM sedan frame?
 
  #6  
Old 08-23-2013, 05:00 PM
lgfuller's Avatar
lgfuller
lgfuller is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i just ran across this, and thats how my F1 is set up. f body clipped. not totally happy about it, but it was done by the PO. when i checked all the measurements vs a a stock truck, it measured out right. that was back in 08, but i could go out and measure it all again if its desired.....
 
  #7  
Old 08-23-2013, 06:53 PM
das54's Avatar
das54
das54 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Here's my take on your question. Back when most of the F body clips and Volare IFS systems were installed there was no internet and therefore no forum like this. Guys doing what we are doing today didn't have much info to go on and didn't find any value in measuring all the geometry because there was almost no one to share with. They just used what they knew about auto mechanics, checked the track of the donor car, and welded that sucker in there so that the front wheels aligned with the fender opening. I'll bet most of them were pretty happy with the results too.
 
  #8  
Old 08-23-2013, 08:10 PM
Delta V's Avatar
Delta V
Delta V is offline
New User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by das54
Here's my take on your question. Back when most of the F body clips and Volare IFS systems were installed there was no internet and therefore no forum like this. Guys doing what we are doing today didn't have much info to go on and didn't find any value in measuring all the geometry because there was almost no one to share with. They just used what they knew about auto mechanics, checked the track of the donor car, and welded that sucker in there so that the front wheels aligned with the fender opening. I'll bet most of them were pretty happy with the results too.
This.

Thesoftwareismakingmewritemorethan10letters, blah, blah, blah...
 
  #9  
Old 08-23-2013, 11:04 PM
tinman52's Avatar
tinman52
tinman52 is offline
Welder User

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: northwest MT
Posts: 5,261
Received 30 Likes on 19 Posts
Nothing wrong with a camaro front end. They dominated the short stock car tracks for years. Don't recall too many mustang 2's racin with them.
Not new technology for sure, but still a sound foundation.
 
  #10  
Old 08-24-2013, 12:01 PM
CharlieLed's Avatar
CharlieLed
CharlieLed is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 7,863
Received 465 Likes on 301 Posts
Here's the layout I have to date...the MKVIII IRS is dialed in and I have a good idea of how long the main frame rails should be. Right now I just need to add the IFS to complete the picture. This plan view shows where I am at, I just need to do the elevation view to see how I need to move the crossmember and tie in the structure of the IRS. Art Morrison builds frames/chassis' using the GM Gen 2 geometry... I am thinking that it may be worthwhile to buy a clip from him and add the aftermarket arms/spindles/steering components.
 
Attached Images  
  #11  
Old 08-24-2013, 02:22 PM
tinman52's Avatar
tinman52
tinman52 is offline
Welder User

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: northwest MT
Posts: 5,261
Received 30 Likes on 19 Posts
Charlie, I have a complete GM sub frame here I could measure....problem is I'm not sure if it is from a Nova or Camaro. It's front steer, any other way to ID them?
 
  #12  
Old 08-24-2013, 08:30 PM
CharlieLed's Avatar
CharlieLed
CharlieLed is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 7,863
Received 465 Likes on 301 Posts
Thanks Scott. Here is one of the drawings that I have been able to find on the net. If I could get a measurement on the side view of this drawing showing where the axle line is then that would help a lot. The "47-1/4" inch line is drawn from two good points of identification...somewhere along this line lies the axle center, that's what I am looking for. If you have a front steer suspension then it should be relevant to this drawing. Thanks....
 
Attached Images  
  #13  
Old 08-25-2013, 12:05 PM
tinman52's Avatar
tinman52
tinman52 is offline
Welder User

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: northwest MT
Posts: 5,261
Received 30 Likes on 19 Posts
Charlie, I did a little measuring....using my trusty sheetrock T square, etc. I came up with 28 3/4" forward from the rearmost reference hole in your side view above. That is not precise of course, but pretty close. I was measuring to the center of the dust cap with the wheels straight (i hope). Dunno if that helps...
 
  #14  
Old 08-25-2013, 12:12 PM
CharlieLed's Avatar
CharlieLed
CharlieLed is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brentwood, TN
Posts: 7,863
Received 465 Likes on 301 Posts
Originally Posted by tinman52
Charlie, I did a little measuring....using my trusty sheetrock T square, etc. I came up with 28 3/4" forward from the rearmost reference hole in your side view above. That is not precise of course, but pretty close. I was measuring to the center of the dust cap with the wheels straight (i hope). Dunno if that helps...
That is a big help...thanks!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Willister86
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
26
05-05-2013 07:36 PM
powerstroke72
Ford vs The Competition
9
02-19-2010 09:52 AM
luckystiff
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
12-17-2009 02:02 AM
deathwishracer
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
08-20-2008 11:28 AM
69_f100
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
08-22-2007 08:04 PM



Quick Reply: Tech Info needed - GM F-body subframe



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 PM.