Modular V10 (6.8l)  

Anyone out there with 4.30 or 4.56 gears?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 08-19-2013, 10:43 PM
jgp_bud's Avatar
jgp_bud
jgp_bud is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've had my 2000 4X4 f350 6.8 dually since new and during it's 135000 miles of only towing have averaged 10mpg. Not bad. I've been hauling 1000lb big squares on a 30ft gooseneck. 27 bales to be exact. Last time I rolled over scale I was 39640lbs....I'm not bragging or being a smart a$$. But don't try and tell me my trans won't hold or that I need different gears or a tuner....no it's not taking off like a rocket, but I don't try too. I love my V10. Sad I can't get a 2014 F350 with one.
 
  #32  
Old 08-21-2013, 08:04 AM
scraprat's Avatar
scraprat
scraprat is online now
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Itinerant
Posts: 7,052
Received 2,469 Likes on 1,288 Posts
Originally Posted by GTA DAVE
First off. Many here stretch the mpg.
2006 F 350 dually
430 gears.
80k miles
In town 7-8
Highway 8-9
Towing 6
Done all maintenance. No issues

But I have a little sports car that gets 30
So, I average 19 between both vehicles.
Just thought real mpg should be seen.
I think some really aren't stretching their mpg details, they might be using only one fill up or an easy trip mileage. I think keeping track for the entire year will give the best mpg details. Here is thread from the past some may have seen it but there are many new FTE readers that might find it informative/ helpful.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...vs-v10s-4.html

I just pulled the the 5th wheel (total truck and trailer 20,500#, 5th wheel 12,650#)from Colorado Springs, CO towards Black hills, SD set the cruise at 65 mph and was getting 7.5 mpg. This truck has 242,000 miles with a new engine put in roughly 60k miles ago.

I thought I had a heavy foot but Dave yours might be slightly heavier.

To the OP, enjoy the truck it's a beast as it is for the earlier year V10s.
 
  #33  
Old 08-28-2013, 12:11 AM
PROSTOCK's Avatar
PROSTOCK
PROSTOCK is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 43 Posts
Well I'll add in too. Just recently purchased a new camper, 7,700 empty, prolly 8,800 going camping. The 3.73's do OK, but not well enough, so I found a complete 4.30 rear end for $350 and will slide that in and see what happens. MPG's, don't really care, it's the power and comfort I'm looking for. I like to keep it between 65 and 70 MPH. Normal speed limits in TX is 75MPH, so I'm still below that and that is about as fast as I feel comfortable with. A 5 star tune might be next, we'll see.

EDIT: I used to tow a 5,700lb camper and got 7-8 MPG, with the new one it's not much different, but I have a noticeable loss in driveability (power). BTW without towing on HWY I get in the low 14's high 13's at 75 or better. It also has 175K on it.
 
  #34  
Old 09-03-2013, 12:12 PM
KP1001's Avatar
KP1001
KP1001 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My axle code reads 4L. Any idea what that would be?
 
  #35  
Old 09-03-2013, 12:15 PM
KP1001's Avatar
KP1001
KP1001 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which tune did you use from 5star?
 
  #36  
Old 09-03-2013, 12:20 PM
KP1001's Avatar
KP1001
KP1001 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wolfboro
I have to correct my earlier statement. I just double-checked 17 number VIN decoder info. It appeared that VIN does not have the axle code . I am pretty sure the drivers side door frame sticker has the axle code . Here are the codes;

Axle Type
31 — 3.73 non-limited slip, F-250/Excursion
C1 — 3.73 limited slip, F-250/Excursion
32 — 4.10 non-limited slip, F-250
C2 — 4.10 limited slip, F-250/Excursion
33 — 4.30 non-limited slip, F-250
C3 — 4.30 limited slip, F-250/Excursion
36 — 4.56 non-limited slip, F-250
C6 — 4.56 limited slip, F-250
41 — 3.73 non-limited slip, F-350 (single rear wheels)
D1 — 3.73 limited slip, F-350 (single rear wheels)
42 — 4.10 non-limited slip, F-350 (single rear wheels)
D2 — 4.10 limited slip, F-350 (single rear wheels)
43 — 4.30 non-limited slip, F-350 (single rear wheels)
D3 — 4.30 limited slip, F-350 (single rear wheels)
46 — 4.56 non-limited slip, F-350 (single rear wheels)
D6 — 4.56 limited slip, F-350 (single rear wheels)
61 — 3.73 non-limited slip, F-350 (dual rear wheels)
F1 — 3.73 limited slip, F-350 (dual rear wheels)
62 — 4.10 non-limited slip, F-350 (dual rear wheels)
F2 — 4.10 limited slip, F-350 (dual rear wheels)
63 — 4.30 non-limited slip, F-350 (dual rear wheels)
66 — 4.56 non-limited slip, F-350 (dual rear wheels)
F6 — 4.56 limited slip, F-350 (dual rear wheels)
81 — 3.73 non-limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
E1 — 3.73 limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
82 — 4.10 non-limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
E2 — 4.10 limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
83 — 4.30 non-limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
E3 — 4.30 limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
86 — 4.56 non-limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
E6 — 4.56 limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
88 — 4.88 non-limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
EW — 4.88 limited slip, F-350 Chassis Cab, narrow frame (dual rear wheels)
G3 — 4.30 limited slip, F-450 Chassis Cab
73 — 4.30 non-limited slip, F-450 Chassis Cab
78 — 4.88 non-limited slip, F-450 Chassis Cab
G8 — 4.88 limited slip, F-450 Chassis Cab
75 — 5.38 non-limited slip, F-450 Chassis Cab
G5 — 5.38 limited slip, F-450 Chassis Cab
GW — 4.10 limited slip, F-450 Chassis Cab
98 — 4.88 non-limited slip, F-550 Chassis Cab
K8 — 4.88 limited slip, F-550 Chassis Cab
95 — 5.38 non-limited slip, F-550 Chassis Cab
K5 — 5.38 limited slip, F-550 Chassis Cab
KW — 4.10 limited slip, F-550 Chassis Cab

Transmission Type
E — Four-speed automatic overdrive (4R100), gasoline engines, F-Series/Excursion
9 — Four-speed automatic overdrive (4R100), diesel engine, F-Series/Excursion
6 — Six-speed manual, Dana ZF (M6HD-6), F-Series
5 — Six-speed manual, F-Series (5.4L, 6.8L Gas)
2 — Five-speed manual, F-Series (5.4L, 6.8L Gas/LPG), Mexico only
.......................
Enjoy your truck !
My quote is 4L. Any idea what that is?
 
  #37  
Old 09-03-2013, 06:27 PM
tobyw's Avatar
tobyw
tobyw is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm no expert, but I believe these codes are somewhat dependent on the year range of your truck... In a quick Google search, I found others with the '4L' code you mention as having 4.30LS...
 
  #38  
Old 09-03-2013, 07:08 PM
PROSTOCK's Avatar
PROSTOCK
PROSTOCK is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 43 Posts
One of the two tags on the differential will have the ratio stamped into it, the other will tell you to use synthetic gear oil. Usually the fist number of the code is hidden under the head of the bolt. 4L30 = 4.30 with Limited slip, 3L73 = 3.73 Limited slip. If there's a " "(space) instead of an "L" it is an open differential, i.e. 3 50 = 3.50 open differential.
 
  #39  
Old 09-14-2013, 12:44 PM
Hooda's Avatar
Hooda
Hooda is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Frozen Minnesota
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Been thinking of going the other way

I have a 2001 f250 6.8, 2V, 4r100, and 3.73 gears in it. Since installing a 2005 (3v) shortblock, raising the compression a good amount,I've put about 35k on it, bringing the total miles to 208k. My mileage hovered at the 10-11 mpg mark until I replaced the plastic pistoned calipers, which were SERIOUSLY hanging up, with a pair rebuilt with metal pistons. I don't know if it was coincidence, but I haven't seen under 12.0, and have gotten as high as 13.6 since this improvement. I've been mulling over the idea of switching to 3.54 gears in hopes of getting that mileage up into the 17-18 range. The only reason I think this is possible is that my truck before this was a '98 Dodge 2500 with a 24 valve cummins and 3.54 gears, and it got a consistent 20+ mpg. Granted, gas and diesel are apples and oranges, but wouldn't the same principles apply?
 
  #40  
Old 09-15-2013, 08:14 PM
KP1001's Avatar
KP1001
KP1001 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont think it would. The diesel will have more low end to pull the taller gear especally when you hook a trailer to it
 
  #41  
Old 09-16-2013, 06:19 PM
truckfella's Avatar
truckfella
truckfella is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 974
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
The main reason your former truck got 20mpg was compression ratio.

Cummins = ~17:1
V10 = 9.2:1

Installing 3.54 gears is going to result in the engine lugging which will likely result in worse mileage, not better.

I came from a Cummins myself and, while I do miss the high teens unladen mileage, it's nice to have a quiet, trouble-free, turn-key-and-go rig again. I love my V10.
 
  #42  
Old 10-13-2013, 11:19 AM
PROSTOCK's Avatar
PROSTOCK
PROSTOCK is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 43 Posts
4.30's installed, not what I expected

Got the 4.30 in and had I paid any more for it I would have been disappointed. $350 for the rear end, $80 in gear oil, $50 for new backing plates, $20 for a hardware kit, and $50 for new seals ---> $550 in all. Around town you can't tell any difference from the 3.73's. Pulling the camper was very slightly better, but not really worth the effort. It's got 175,000 on it and that may be part of the problem, but it may be tune time now.
 
  #43  
Old 10-14-2013, 12:26 AM
AllAboutDaZ's Avatar
AllAboutDaZ
AllAboutDaZ is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by PROSTOCK
Got the 4.30 in and had I paid any more for it I would have been disappointed. $350 for the rear end, $80 in gear oil, $50 for new backing plates, $20 for a hardware kit, and $50 for new seals ---> $550 in all. Around town you can't tell any difference from the 3.73's. Pulling the camper was very slightly better, but not really worth the effort. It's got 175,000 on it and that may be part of the problem, but it may be tune time now.

what size tire are you using ?
 
  #44  
Old 10-14-2013, 09:08 PM
dt75flh's Avatar
dt75flh
dt75flh is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Viva Las Vegas
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PROSTOCK
Got the 4.30 in and had I paid any more for it I would have been disappointed. $350 for the rear end, $80 in gear oil, $50 for new backing plates, $20 for a hardware kit, and $50 for new seals ---> $550 in all. Around town you can't tell any difference from the 3.73's. Pulling the camper was very slightly better, but not really worth the effort. It's got 175,000 on it and that may be part of the problem, but it may be tune time now.
basically going from 3.73 to 4.30 gears changed your rpm by 300. so if you are running the same size tires then your rpms have increased by 300..

still has to pull a lil better than stock from a standing start, and should be a lil easier on the trans, when on the hills towing. but not a huge jump. the v-10 do make power a lil higher in the rpm band though.
 
  #45  
Old 10-19-2013, 09:53 AM
PROSTOCK's Avatar
PROSTOCK
PROSTOCK is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,852
Likes: 0
Received 56 Likes on 43 Posts
I am running stock size tires.
You can't say it's 300 RPM more, it's variable with speed. Instead it's a 15% increase in RPM. Said another way, I have 15% more mechanical advantage over the rear tires. The higher the speed without shifting, the higher the difference over the 3.73's. It just so happens you are right though, with 3.73 I was running about 2,000RPM at 70MPH, now it's 2,300RPM at 70.
I almost think that 4.56 gears would get me where I want it. It seems we start building steam at 2,500, 4.56 gears would get pretty close to that.
I'm not wanting to do another rear end change so I think we'll look instead at improving the engine performance.
 


Quick Reply: Anyone out there with 4.30 or 4.56 gears?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 AM.