Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cam swap 351w

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-21-2013, 02:55 PM
Shwan_89HD's Avatar
Shwan_89HD
Shwan_89HD is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Harlingen,TX
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cam swap 351w

Ive heard the flat tappet cams on the 351w are pretty crappy. My motor is bone stock and was thinking of starting by first swapping out the stock cam with this roller cam. http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ed...FUxp7AodYWwAfQ Its my daily driver, just looking to get a little more kick into it. Would you notice a difference in performance bu just swapping out the cam?
 
  #2  
Old 05-21-2013, 09:55 PM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,573
Received 1,157 Likes on 915 Posts
That is way too much cam for a Speed Density controlled engine without a major tune and other pieces to go with it. Too much lift for factory springs and heads. Too little LSA to be happy with Speed Density as well.

The specification area also states in black and white:

Computer-Controlled Compatible: No
 
  #3  
Old 05-21-2013, 11:49 PM
GNR22's Avatar
GNR22
GNR22 is offline
Fabri-cobbler
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 4,163
Received 514 Likes on 339 Posts
You need to check out the Crane Cam 444232. Those are about as good as you're going to get under your speed density computer.
 
  #4  
Old 05-22-2013, 09:02 AM
hotrod351's Avatar
hotrod351
hotrod351 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: mohave valley, arizona
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
agree, way to much. more than likely make your engine run worse. have to make sure on what the compression requirements are. most cams require a certain compression to work right. if you want more power a good rv cam would be the way to go. summitt and other suppliers can tell what would work best for what you have.
 
  #5  
Old 05-22-2013, 10:41 AM
Shwan_89HD's Avatar
Shwan_89HD
Shwan_89HD is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Harlingen,TX
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GNR22
You need to check out the Crane Cam 444232. Those are about as good as you're going to get under your speed density computer.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cr...2/applications like this one? So whats the difference between a roller cam and flat tappet? I know the stock 351w comes with a crappy flat tappet cam
 
  #6  
Old 05-22-2013, 11:31 AM
rla2005's Avatar
rla2005
rla2005 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 19,573
Received 1,157 Likes on 915 Posts
Originally Posted by Shwan_89HD
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/cr...2/applications like this one? So whats the difference between a roller cam and flat tappet? I know the stock 351w comes with a crappy flat tappet cam
Exact same cam GNR22 suggested in Post#3

A short summary of the differences between a roller vs. flat tappet cam/lifters: Flat Tappet Cams vs. Roller Cams - Lunati Power
 
  #7  
Old 05-22-2013, 03:17 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,898
Likes: 0
Received 951 Likes on 755 Posts
Converting a motor from flat tappet to roller is a good idea but it will cost about 3 times as much because roller cams are more expensive and you need a set of roller lifters at a cost of about $300 and a shorter set of pushrods. The reason flat tappet cams are failing these days is because the oil companies have removed almost all of the zinc from modern gasolines, zinc is was important for lubricating flat tappet cams but all new motors use roller cams so it's not needed... unless you drive an old vehicle
 
  #8  
Old 05-23-2013, 10:59 AM
Shwan_89HD's Avatar
Shwan_89HD
Shwan_89HD is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Harlingen,TX
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Conanski
Converting a motor from flat tappet to roller is a good idea but it will cost about 3 times as much because roller cams are more expensive and you need a set of roller lifters at a cost of about $300 and a shorter set of pushrods. The reason flat tappet cams are failing these days is because the oil companies have removed almost all of the zinc from modern gasolines, zinc is was important for lubricating flat tappet cams but all new motors use roller cams so it's not needed... unless you drive an old vehicle
Ya i never thought of the lifters, the whole idea of roller cam though sounds alot smoother and more efficient than a flat tappet
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
atccracing
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
34
02-26-2014 08:29 PM
Bugzturbo
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
05-22-2008 12:02 PM
kjett
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
22
08-26-2007 04:31 PM
77bigblock
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
09-27-2006 08:36 PM
fordguy351w
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
11-29-2003 10:06 PM



Quick Reply: Cam swap 351w



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.