Notices
Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator 1991-1994, 1995-2001, 2002-2005, 2006-2010 Ford Explorer

Code 420, Need help to diagnose

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 18, 2012 | 06:50 PM
  #16  
aquanaut20's Avatar
aquanaut20
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,263
Likes: 92
From: BC Canada
A positive percentage indicates the computer is adding fuel while a negative number indicates the computer is allowing less fuel....

Maybe this will help ..... Philip
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2012 | 06:53 PM
  #17  
aquanaut20's Avatar
aquanaut20
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,263
Likes: 92
From: BC Canada
Positive LTFT means the map was initially lean and the LTFT's were modified to add fuel.

Maybe this will help..
What are fuel trims all about?

... Philip
 

Last edited by aquanaut20; Dec 18, 2012 at 06:56 PM. Reason: Computer hung during save....
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2012 | 08:02 PM
  #18  
yorky's Avatar
yorky
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
unless you computer was cleared by either disconnecting the battery or by a scan tool, you might be able to view the freeze frame data which will tell you how it was running at the time the code was sent. i say might cause i don't know if the computer deletes it itself when it turns the light out after a recheck/drive cycles or if that tool has the option
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 06:21 PM
  #19  
cbusbronco's Avatar
cbusbronco
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Update: I replaced the upstream O2 sensors today. After I replaced them I drove it around the block and checked the data. The LTFT for banks 1 and 2 were positive values of 3.1 and .08. My check engine light was off so I thought I had it fixed.

Then I drove to dinner and on the way home the check engine light came back on. I pulled the same code as before, P0420. I ran the data and the LTFT increased to positive 7.0 and 3.8. Now I'm kind of stumped as to what is causing the problem. Any thoughts on where I should try next? Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 06:35 PM
  #20  
KhanTyranitar's Avatar
KhanTyranitar
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 7
Under what conditions is the fuel trim recorded? At idle, at 2500 rpm? What conditions the fuel trims you are viewing are under is a related factor. Vacuum leaks, dirty MAF, worn spark plugs, incomplete combustion, all of these things affect the fuel trim.

When was the last time this car had a full tune up?
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 07:44 PM
  #21  
cbusbronco's Avatar
cbusbronco
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
The fuel trim tests were performed at idle which was about 750 rpm. If I perform the test at other rpm ranges what should I be looking for?

I purchased the car in march and the P0420 code was present when I purchased it. I then performed a full tune up at that time. I have since put about 12k miles on it. The tune up included new spark plugs, fuel filter, air filter, pcv valve, and serpentine belt. Then more recently I replaced the radiator and flushed the cooling system. I also have now replaced all 4 O2 sensors.

I pulled the MAF earlier tonight and the wires did have a light dirt film on them, but I'm not sure what's normal so I can't say if it was excessively dirty or not. I was going to clean it but am out of MAF cleaner so I might try that tomorrow.

I also tried to check for vacuum leaks. From what I can tell, everything appears to be connected properly and I could not find any leaks. That was just visually inspecting it and running my hands over the lines.
 
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #22  
yorky's Avatar
yorky
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
ok we know what the trims are, granted there a tad high since 0 is ideal. i just changed all my intake gaskets (upper and lower) and mine are in the same ball park with no p0420 code (but got a stubborn evap leak). since you have access to live data, what do the readings for the o2 sensors look like? upstream bouncing off the floor and ceiling so to say and down stream holding steady, or 3 of the 4 if not all 4 bouncing off the floor and ceiling. (i'm assuming that you have a dual exhaust since you got 4 sensors and I don't think the codes will tell you cat bank 1 or 2)
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 08:38 AM
  #23  
KhanTyranitar's Avatar
KhanTyranitar
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 7
LTFT% that are higher at idle than when tested at higher RPMs points to vacuum leaks. LTFT% that is high all the time suggests dirty or contaminated MAF. If the LTFT% climbs as RPMs and load increases, then you may have a fuel delivery problem.

On the MAF any dirt on the element is too much. Clean it with a purpose made cleaner and see if that doesn't improve the LTFT% (and throttle response).

Vacuum leaks can occur as the upper and lower intake gaskets harden and shrink with age. These leaks can be serious and yet difficult to track down. Leaks in the EVAP lines can also cause issues.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 01:55 PM
  #24  
cbusbronco's Avatar
cbusbronco
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
I cleaned the MAF and throttle body today with the correct cleaner for both. I cleared the codes and drove it around for a little bit and tried to get different types of driving conditions. When I idle at a stop light my LTFT were positive 5.4 and 3.9. While driving they fluctuated and both banks would float between a positive 7 - 10. When I floored it the numbers would go as high as 14 or 15.

Additionally the readings for O2S11, O2S12, and O2S21 fluctuated from 0 to .8. However O2S22 stayed pretty constant around .680. The scanner gives me lots of other data as well, but I'm not quite sure how to interpret most of it, so it there is other data I should look at also just let me know.

Lastly, I'm not sure if this helps, but during the test drive the check engine light did not come on. It seemed to stay on more in the summer and now that the cold weather is here it is staying off more.
 
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 04:07 PM
  #25  
yorky's Avatar
yorky
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
o2s11 (bank 1 sensor 1) and O2S21 (bank 2 sensor 1) should bounce like that but O2S12 (bank 1 sensor 2) should hold steady like O2S22. Since O2S12 bounced around, I would have to say that that cat isn't working. Bank 1 sensor 2 would be the sensor right after the cat on the pass side (4x4 or rear wheel drive). I would be buying a cat after seeing that.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 11:18 AM
  #26  
cbusbronco's Avatar
cbusbronco
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Ok, that helps. It will be much cheaper and easier to replace the one bad cat instead of all three.

My only question is what about the fuel trim levels. I would hate to replace the cat only to have it go bad again.

From what Khan said, my fuel trims are acting like a lack of fuel supply. If that's the case then I'm wondering if the two problems are unrelated. Compensating for a lack of fuel supply wouldn't cause it to run rich and destroy the cat. Is that correct?

The only other thing I could think of would be if the fuel pressure sensor is bad and reading an incorrect lack of fuel supply. But I wouldn't know how to test that. Maybe I'm missing something here though.

Thanks for everyone's help so far! This has really helped me narrow down the problem.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 01:32 PM
  #27  
yorky's Avatar
yorky
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cbusbronco
Ok, that helps. It will be much cheaper and easier to replace the one bad cat instead of all three.

My only question is what about the fuel trim levels. I would hate to replace the cat only to have it go bad again.

From what Khan said, my fuel trims are acting like a lack of fuel supply. If that's the case then I'm wondering if the two problems are unrelated. Compensating for a lack of fuel supply wouldn't cause it to run rich and destroy the cat. Is that correct?

The only other thing I could think of would be if the fuel pressure sensor is bad and reading an incorrect lack of fuel supply. But I wouldn't know how to test that. Maybe I'm missing something here though.

Thanks for everyone's help so far! This has really helped me narrow down the problem.
your fuel trims are adjusted by your O2 sensors. if they read to much air, it calls for more fuel, not enough air then less fuel. It's primary reason is to keep the cat/s happy because it needs both a rich then a lean burn (which is why the sensors bounce around so much) to work properly. With your trims in the mid to low single digits, at the moment I wouldn't worry about it. If they were in the upper teens to 20's (either pos or neg) that would be a different story. Cats are known to go once in a while. My parents have a car where they are a common problem.

if you still want to check your fuel psi, there might be a test port on your fuel rail that has a blue cap on it. That way all you need to do is attach a fuel psi gauge to it.
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 02:23 PM
  #28  
Twistedwrench's Avatar
Twistedwrench
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Sounds to me like a vacuum leak , get some carb clean and spray various intake mating surfaces , while doing this watch the short term fuel trim , if you get rich spikes then you will have located the vacuum .
 
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 04:55 PM
  #29  
KhanTyranitar's Avatar
KhanTyranitar
Postmaster
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,432
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by cbusbronco
I cleaned the MAF and throttle body today with the correct cleaner for both. I cleared the codes and drove it around for a little bit and tried to get different types of driving conditions. When I idle at a stop light my LTFT were positive 5.4 and 3.9. While driving they fluctuated and both banks would float between a positive 7 - 10. When I floored it the numbers would go as high as 14 or 15.

Additionally the readings for O2S11, O2S12, and O2S21 fluctuated from 0 to .8. However O2S22 stayed pretty constant around .680. The scanner gives me lots of other data as well, but I'm not quite sure how to interpret most of it, so it there is other data I should look at also just let me know.

Lastly, I'm not sure if this helps, but during the test drive the check engine light did not come on. It seemed to stay on more in the summer and now that the cold weather is here it is staying off more.
The fact that your fuel trims get even more out of hand as RPM and load increases suggests that you might have a low fuel pressure problem, or the injectors are plugged, or you are getting incomplete burn due to spark blowout (as the cylinder pressures rise, the spark requires more energy, if it doesn't get enough spark, the ignition we be both late and weak). You need to correct the chronic high LTFT% or any new cat you install will be ruined.
 
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2013 | 06:05 PM
  #30  
cbusbronco's Avatar
cbusbronco
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
I know this is an old post, but hey I got busy and I still have this problem. I was able to read the data when the code was set and was a little surprised at what I found. It showed lots of data but below is the fuel trim data it showed when the code was set. Does anyone have an idea what this means. I was pretty surprised to see such large negative numbers.

ST FTRM 1, 0.8%
LT FTRM 1, 5.4%
ST FTRM 2, 0.0%
LT FTRM 2, 5.4%
ST FTRM 3, -100.6%
LT FTRM 3, -100.6%
LT FTRM 4, -100.6%
ST FTRM 4, -100.6%
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE