Look out ford, gm, and dodge, international is entering the HD sector!!!!
#31
Those cat trucks are larger work trucks, not nearly the same class as pickups. Maybe if they work out good for several years, CAT might have something.
Cat had a name in equipment and industrial and marine engines...
OTR cat engines never really made any huge advances to write home about, IMHO.
From what I have heard, understood, been told, etc, international and detroit diesel have bee the most economical engines to run in large fleet vehicles.
Cat had a name in equipment and industrial and marine engines...
OTR cat engines never really made any huge advances to write home about, IMHO.
From what I have heard, understood, been told, etc, international and detroit diesel have bee the most economical engines to run in large fleet vehicles.
#32
It surely looks like the pickup medium duty gap is closing quickly... International has some of the best chips to play.. also ford does too... wouldn't it be something to see a light medium duty pickup war between international and ford !!! haha, nobody would believe it until now!!
#33
#34
Oh wait.
#35
Yeah, a competition might likely spark up the best trucks yet.
I think ford might get forced into more longevity and lifespan;
International might get pushed into more creature comforts.....
Either way, we all win
#36
No,, I don't think so either, when you mentioned putting a truck box on the terra, but didn't like that it didn't have 4x4, I figured I would mention the mxt, which has both thats all.
#38
#39
Navistar had two duds in the light duty engine market up until now with the 6.0L and 6.4L Powerstroke/VT/MaxxForce engines. And they use that same much-maligned 6.4L engine in this TerraStar vehicle of theirs in a chassis that makes it easier to service. The first time out of the gate Ford had a winner of an engine with the 6.7L Powerstroke, and this was after seven years of fail with Navistar engines.
Some would say that I don't like anything Navistar. And they'd be right.
#40
#41
So yeah, lots o' fleet buyers spec Cummins engines in their Navistar trucks. Same way there are lots of Cummins- and Caterpillar-powered Freightliners out there rather than Freightliner's in-house Detroit brand.
#42
The CXT is much larger, and costs way more that a diesel pickup, like 2x more.
I think a lot of guys would like one, but the cost is prohibitave, and also it might even be too big.
The terrastar is just a little bigger than a pickup, tougher, and not much if any more cost to buy.
#43
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
Received 177 Likes
on
152 Posts
Am I the only one in here that has driven the late model internationals and realized how uncomfortable, cheap and poorly made the cabs are??????? HATE is an understatement. I thought the pos cab was about to fall off the chassis, door was wobbeling and flexing, dash was vibrating....gawdddd. Did I mention ugly? The cab and doors have no shape, they are just cost-effecient straight and square to save money, no design needed. Oh and who said int. has more experience building and selling medium duty trucks??? Ford has been doing it since before the 1930's... Internationals are hella sheity.
Having said this, long live the 7.3 in my ex.
Having said this, long live the 7.3 in my ex.
#44
I don't think so. I have very little faith in International, and have heard very few positive things about their commercial trucks over the years. Their engine lineup since 2007 is a great example of how they have lost touch with reality. Their current engines use a massive EGR system that destroys any semblance of fuel economy under the guise of reduced complexity. But these systems are by themselves complex, and the worst part is that this long-term corporate strategy failed miserably when it couldn't even meet the EPA emissions targets. Up until recently they were paying something like a $1,900 FINE per engine because their system failed to do what it was supposed to. Which does nothing but passes more cost onto those buying the trucks in addition to the increased fuel cost.
Navistar had two duds in the light duty engine market up until now with the 6.0L and 6.4L Powerstroke/VT/MaxxForce engines. And they use that same much-maligned 6.4L engine in this TerraStar vehicle of theirs in a chassis that makes it easier to service. The first time out of the gate Ford had a winner of an engine with the 6.7L Powerstroke, and this was after seven years of fail with Navistar engines.
Some would say that I don't like anything Navistar. And they'd be right.
Navistar had two duds in the light duty engine market up until now with the 6.0L and 6.4L Powerstroke/VT/MaxxForce engines. And they use that same much-maligned 6.4L engine in this TerraStar vehicle of theirs in a chassis that makes it easier to service. The first time out of the gate Ford had a winner of an engine with the 6.7L Powerstroke, and this was after seven years of fail with Navistar engines.
Some would say that I don't like anything Navistar. And they'd be right.
I won't defend the choices made regarding the EGR VS urea debate, but that isn't just an international feature.
The 6.4 currently used by international is a lot different than the ford one, and honestly I think you'd be surprised by the highway MPG.
Fords 6.7 seems to be working out great for ford, but I think that's because they have full control over it... I don't see anything on that engine that is more than marginally better than the 6.4. A few things ARE better, but the 6.4 is better in other regards, it's not just a clean neat argument.
I do find it mind boggling that they'd rather pay 2000$ per engine in fines to not put a urea system on, but what do I know.
I have a feeling they might deal with emissions in a different way eventually, theres lots of talk about propane / natural gas on international forums. I mean in the sense that it might be getting implemented on new engines. Who knows what their plan is ...
#45
Am I the only one in here that has driven the late model internationals and realized how uncomfortable, cheap and poorly made the cabs are??????? HATE is an understatement. I thought the pos cab was about to fall off the chassis, door was wobbeling and flexing, dash was vibrating....gawdddd. Did I mention ugly? Oh and who said int. has more experience building and selling medium duty trucks??? Ford has been doing it since before the 1930's... Internationals are hella sheity.
Not trying to take sides, or undermine your opinion; but I've heard the same or similar comments about all the big 3 trucks.
Obviously it all depends on what you're looking for, every brand, trim, etc of any vehicle is a little different, and different over model years etc, I
suspect international would be no different.
My opinion of the terrastar is that it rides super tight, even when you don't want it to...
I didn't notice any flexing or anything, seemed super tight in every aspect. Was a little louder than my 6.4 f350 though.