Tires size and MPG
#46
I agree with Forest, look at the page below, half the mods are related to aerodynamics, while each one may not have a huge impact every little bit adds up.
65+ Vehicle modifications for better fuel economy - EcoModder.com
These guys are crazy, chop off the mirrors, aerodynamic hub caps, etc. Some of the mods look ridiculous, but THEY WORK!
65+ Vehicle modifications for better fuel economy - EcoModder.com
These guys are crazy, chop off the mirrors, aerodynamic hub caps, etc. Some of the mods look ridiculous, but THEY WORK!
#47
sorry it took so long to get back. I was busy doing this - MBRP Downpipe Install
back on subject. Sorry, let me say I'm speaking about Rolling Resistance...but I called it rotational resistance. same thing IMO. Either way, I'm bored with this argument and you're nitpicking over semantic.
not sure why you refuse to believe that air dams and physically lowering the vehicle, and changing other things like tire size don't work. Guys above posted plenty of proof for both concepts. I highly suggest you give each a try if you ever want to gain some mileage
back on subject. Sorry, let me say I'm speaking about Rolling Resistance...but I called it rotational resistance. same thing IMO. Either way, I'm bored with this argument and you're nitpicking over semantic.
not sure why you refuse to believe that air dams and physically lowering the vehicle, and changing other things like tire size don't work. Guys above posted plenty of proof for both concepts. I highly suggest you give each a try if you ever want to gain some mileage
even if having a big rig is your objective...cool. I've got one too. I'll take the MPG/Performance for the look and fun factor
it ain't for everyone though. please don't ridicule a concept that you don't agree with. Especially one that works
it ain't for everyone though. please don't ridicule a concept that you don't agree with. Especially one that works
#48
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
sorry it took so long to get back. I was busy doing this - MBRP Downpipe Install
back on subject. Sorry, let me say I'm speaking about Rolling Resistance...but I called it rotational resistance. same thing IMO. Either way, I'm bored with this argument and you're nitpicking over semantic.
not sure why you refuse to believe that air dams and physically lowering the vehicle, and changing other things like tire size don't work. Guys above posted plenty of proof for both concepts. I highly suggest you give each a try if you ever want to gain some mileage
back on subject. Sorry, let me say I'm speaking about Rolling Resistance...but I called it rotational resistance. same thing IMO. Either way, I'm bored with this argument and you're nitpicking over semantic.
not sure why you refuse to believe that air dams and physically lowering the vehicle, and changing other things like tire size don't work. Guys above posted plenty of proof for both concepts. I highly suggest you give each a try if you ever want to gain some mileage
even if having a big rig is your objective...cool. I've got one too. I'll take the MPG/Performance for the look and fun factor ?????????????
it ain't for everyone though. please don't ridicule a concept that you don't agree with. Especially one that works
it ain't for everyone though. please don't ridicule a concept that you don't agree with. Especially one that works
#49
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
@EXv10, fuel economy is a cumulative equation. I managed to gain 4 MPG highway by: pumping up the tires, cutting the CAT off, and cleaning the MAF sensor.
The front air dams have no other purpose than fuel economy.
Look at this... Effects Of Air Dam (Ford F350 pickup) - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com
The front air dams have no other purpose than fuel economy.
Look at this... Effects Of Air Dam (Ford F350 pickup) - Fuel Economy, Hypermiling, EcoModding News and Forum - EcoModder.com
#50
Simple science experiment
Take some rope and 2 weights. Say a 10 lbs and 15 lbs.
Put each on a 5 ft length of rope. Now spin in a circle and get both weights to spin out centrifugally as high as they'll go. Shoot for waist height for comparison sake
Now which one was harder to get spinning?
Which one was harder to maintain at speed/height?
Imperfect experiment, but it closely simulates what your motor does when you hit the go pedal. This holds true for flywheels or rim/tire. Less weight is easier to keep going. They each have a certain inertia, but that is countered by losses such as air friction and gravity
These losses must be made up for. We'd be in agreement if this were a perfect world and losses didn't occur. Since they do, that takes extra work by the motor; which equates to more fuel burnt
Take some rope and 2 weights. Say a 10 lbs and 15 lbs.
Put each on a 5 ft length of rope. Now spin in a circle and get both weights to spin out centrifugally as high as they'll go. Shoot for waist height for comparison sake
Now which one was harder to get spinning?
Which one was harder to maintain at speed/height?
Imperfect experiment, but it closely simulates what your motor does when you hit the go pedal. This holds true for flywheels or rim/tire. Less weight is easier to keep going. They each have a certain inertia, but that is countered by losses such as air friction and gravity
These losses must be made up for. We'd be in agreement if this were a perfect world and losses didn't occur. Since they do, that takes extra work by the motor; which equates to more fuel burnt
#51
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Simple science experiment
Take some rope and 2 weights. Say a 10 lbs and 15 lbs.
Put each on a 5 ft length of rope. Now spin in a circle and get both weights to spin out centrifugally as high as they'll go. Shoot for waist height for comparison sake
Now which one was harder to get spinning?
Which one was harder to maintain at speed/height?
Imperfect experiment, but it closely simulates what your motor does when you hit the go pedal. This holds true for flywheels or rim/tire. Less weight is easier to keep going. They each have a certain inertia, but that is countered by losses such as air friction and gravity
These losses must be made up for. We'd be in agreement if this were a perfect world and losses didn't occur. Since they do, that takes extra work by the motor; which equates to more fuel burnt
Take some rope and 2 weights. Say a 10 lbs and 15 lbs.
Put each on a 5 ft length of rope. Now spin in a circle and get both weights to spin out centrifugally as high as they'll go. Shoot for waist height for comparison sake
Now which one was harder to get spinning?
Which one was harder to maintain at speed/height?
Imperfect experiment, but it closely simulates what your motor does when you hit the go pedal. This holds true for flywheels or rim/tire. Less weight is easier to keep going. They each have a certain inertia, but that is countered by losses such as air friction and gravity
These losses must be made up for. We'd be in agreement if this were a perfect world and losses didn't occur. Since they do, that takes extra work by the motor; which equates to more fuel burnt
#54
#56
Soooo another update. I'm sticking with the 37's. Let's face it, I didn't buy her for her MPG's. Purchased a Superchips Vivid tuner that should be in any day. Going to get some 4.88's in the very near future. The tuner will help with the towing since we just got a 29' travel trailer, as well as the gears. And the 4.88's should help with the city MPG's as well.
#57
Split the difference and go with 36's lol.
I am at the same crosswords. I'm having a six inch lifought on my X soon, and I can't decide between the 315-75-16 or 37's. I want the 37's but I can use my stock rims with the 315's, it will pull better when needed, tires are way cheaper, and of course the mileage will be a little better. In the end I will probably run the 315's in a AT, but keep my eyes open for a 37 tire/wheel combo for playing.
I am at the same crosswords. I'm having a six inch lifought on my X soon, and I can't decide between the 315-75-16 or 37's. I want the 37's but I can use my stock rims with the 315's, it will pull better when needed, tires are way cheaper, and of course the mileage will be a little better. In the end I will probably run the 315's in a AT, but keep my eyes open for a 37 tire/wheel combo for playing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fordtrck302
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
3
03-22-2005 06:30 PM